Perfecto vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Perforce and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Perforce is ranked #19, while Zeenyx is ranked #23. Perforce holds a 2.3% mindshare in FT, compared to Zeenyx’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.

Perfecto

Read 23 Perfecto reviews

5,828 Views
3,497 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews

3,094 Views
2,197 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Perfecto

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Perfecto and Zeenyx AscentialTest are competing products in the software testing market. Perfecto is favored for customer satisfaction and support, while Zeenyx AscentialTest excels in functionality.

Features: Perfecto supports extensive mobile and web testing across numerous devices with robust automation and seamless cross-platform integration. Zeenyx AscentialTest has powerful test automation capabilities with efficient test creation through drag-and-drop features and comprehensive object recognition, ideal for complex scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Perfecto could enhance initial setup efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Improvements in reporting features could further benefit users. Zeenyx AscentialTest would profit from streamlining deployment processes and broadening cloud-based offerings. Enhancing customer support options could also improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Perfecto offers a cloud-based deployment with responsive customer support, facilitating quick adaptation. Zeenyx AscentialTest typically uses an on-premise setup, which allows for tailored integration but demands more resources initially. Perfecto's cloud solution contrasts with Zeenyx's customized but resource-intensive approach.

Pricing and ROI: Perfecto’s higher subscription-based pricing allows for immediate ROI through fast deployment. Zeenyx AscentialTest provides a more competitive pricing model, with higher initial costs but potential long-term returns due to its sophisticated automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Perfecto vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Perfecto

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (12th), Mobile App Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (19th)

Zeenyx AscentialTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Perfecto is 2.3%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 2.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Perfecto	2.3%
Zeenyx AscentialTest	2.1%
Other	95.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Rodrigo Candido Costa

Software Quality and Automation Specialist at PRIME CONTROL

The solution saves us money because the cost of each license is 10 times lower than what we would spend to maintain infrastructure here

Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device. We can interact with the code in the debugging tool, but we cannot directly click on the element on the screen or send other kinds of inputs to the device. This is possible with other tools. Also, it would be nice if there were some kind of API to get a list of available devices. Currently, we have to look at the web interface to see the available devices, but the pipelines can't do it on their own there. We always need to do this manually, so it would be better if this feature was automated.

Read full review

Tobias Roth

Software developer at Weiss GmbH Softwarelösungen

Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration

The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting feature is really tough to find in some of the other products that are competitors. Having your CITB type dashboard, where we can see the test results and see recordings of each test that passed or failed, is probably one of the distinguishing aspects of Perfecto."

"It has saved hours of manual testing time, costs and efforts."

"In terms of cross-platform testing, they offer all of it, every device available in the market. It covers real scenarios that mimic production so that we don't miss out on any devices that our clients might be using to run the applications we develop. It's been great and very helpful."

"Overall, it's a great solution."

"The automated test reporting functionality is the most valuable feature. We use the CI Dashboard. It's very important as it is the main reporting tool for our automated tests."

"We are continuously doing testing on different environments, devices, and platforms. It executes seamlessly on multiple devices without having any connectivity issues. It has been really helpful for us to test on cloud devices."

"We are able to offer a quality product that has been tested fully, which improves our customer satisfaction. That is a good thing. It has also reduced our IT infrastructure cost. We don't have to spend a lot on setting up infrastructure, which becomes redundant or obsolete very soon. It helps in offsetting that cost."

"I also like the reporting functions. We are constantly downloading these reports and sharing them with our final customers. They help us understand what kind of bugs are happening through the applications. The recording feature is handy because it lets us see a video of the process we run through the pipeline and discover the point at which the automation is breaking."

More Perfecto pros

"Our web site is dynamically generated to each user, so much so that the only testing solution we found was AscentialTest."

"Productivity increased by almost 10 times after using AT for test automation as manually it was taking almost a day or three days (sometimes a week) effort to do data verification of expected and actual excel files with huge number of columns and rows (approximately 50 columns and thousands of rows)."

"I am a 30+ year IT professional and the level of support I have gotten has been unparalleled."

"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."

"Customer service is excellent; very helpful in addressing the issues and never hesitant in accepting the issues from their end; very responsive and quick to provide assistance."

"Great support, powerful tool, easy enough for entry-level staff to use."

"It's been really easy to automate the same applications TestComplete struggled with."

"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest pros

Cons

"Previously, we used the cradle. Every time the mobile was blocking it, we would have to ask Perfecto to provide another one. That took a lot of time away from us."

"I'm hoping they can support on-premises instances. We have been working on a JIRA integration with Perfecto—and I'm extremely impressed that they have that—but at this time they're not supporting onsite JIRA instances, which is what we have."

"We don't use Perforce's BlazeMeter with Perfecto. From my perspective, it's not really relevant."

"Sometimes, when the automated tests sync up or we have to debug remotely, we cannot interact directly with the device."

"The monitoring features, in particular network traffic monitoring, could be improved."

"It is slow compared to physical device testing. The interactive speed could be improved."

"The flakiness, or the accuracy, of the test execution can be improved. Also, the responsiveness of their cloud lab could be improved as well."

"When using devices on the cloud, it lags quite a bit at times."

More Perfecto cons

"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."

"It would be better if the support for Web Tables and Siebel Tables are readily available and made more simpler as they are encountered quite often while automating the apps."

"The product does have limitations on how certain project files are locked (checked-out)."

"The product can be improved a little bit with regards to the UI as the panels are too many."

"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."

"Limitations are found to be primarily in the ux of the tool; for example when in doubt one often right clicks in an unfamiliar product to get unstuck, and AscentialTest lacks some of these fineries."

"It would be great if AscentialTest supported the license server being in the cloud."

"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing-wise, it is fine. It is not as expensive as what we used to have in the past from HP, IBM, and others. It is decently priced."

"Pricing is an area where Perfecto can do a little better. When we obtain additional licenses, we enter into negotiations with them."

"I am not sure about its pricing, but from our perspective, licensing has been easy. Anytime I have new users or requests for users that want to get added, it's a very simple process. I just give the architectural owner of the product the name and email address, and they're able to easily add a new user. We don't have any issues in regards to getting licenses, but I don't have any insights into pricing."

"It's definitely on the higher end of prices for this type of service."

"Perfecto is about 30-40% cheaper than Device Anywhere. That was a big reason why we switched. Perfecto also solves some of the issues that we had with Device Anywhere. We have grown by 100% since we started to use Perfecto, and now we have devices roaming. When we look at the competition, we would still stick with Perfecto."

"Although Perfecto is a good product for us to use, it is a bit expensive. It takes management a bit of work to find the appropriate funding for us to keep Perfecto. I imagine there could be some way to make it more accessible."

"Perfecto has definitely saved us on the costs and efforts of having to maintain our own virtual test environment. We lost about 20 devices in the past to maintenance and audit. That was a massive loss for us, as a company, because we were giving devices to someone, but don't know whether we would get it back or not. Having those virtual labs, we don't need to worry about these kinds of things. We are easily saving $5,000 to $10,000 a month on device costing."

"This is an expensive solution compared to others, by 30% to 40%."

More Perfecto pricing and cost advice

"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

18%

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Perfecto

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Perfecto

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Perfecto

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Perfecto

Compared 5% of the time

More Perfecto Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto

September 2026

Download Perfecto product report

Buyer's Guide

Zeenyx AscentialTest

September 2026

Download Zeenyx AscentialTest product report

Also Known As

Perfecto Mobile, Perfecto Web

AscentialTest

Overview

Perfecto is a cloud-based testing platform that supports automated and manual testing processes across many devices and operating systems, facilitating cross-platform and real-time data access. Users experience seamless testing integrations, although improvements are sought in some areas.

Perfecto provides extensive mobile testing capabilities across iOS, Android, and more, with automation and enhanced reporting options such as video recordings. While it excels with Appium and Selenium integration for cross-platform consistency and CI Dashboard features, it faces challenges in iOS web testing and hybrid apps. Users indicate the need for better integration with test management tools, dashboard metrics improvements, and machine learning features. Cloud device response times and UI interactions could benefit from performance enhancements, while users desire longer report history and API automation advancements.

What are Perfecto's most important features?

Cloud-based Architecture: Access a vast array of devices and OS versions for testing scalability.
Automation: Supports Selenium and Appium for streamlined testing processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Offers video recordings to help validate tests thoroughly.
Cross-platform Testing: Execute tests across multiple platforms efficiently.
Real-time Data Access: Monitor tests via CI Dashboard and Live Stream.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from reviews?

Increased Device Availability: Quickly access the newest devices and software updates.
Improved Testing Speed: Allow faster test execution and feedback loops.
Scalability: Easily scale up or down with cloud-based resources.
Enhanced Productivity: Automate tests and streamline reporting for efficiency.

Perfecto has broad applications in industries such as retail, finance, and technology, where secure and scalable testing is critical. Organizations employ it in both private and public cloud environments for mobile, web, and API testing. Its ability to provide extensive device coverage and integration into existing CI/CD processes makes it integral for ensuring reliable mobile app performance and compatibility across platforms.

Perforce

Zeenyx AscentialTest offers a powerful test automation solution providing features such as object recognition and drag-and-drop interfaces to streamline the test creation process across multiple environments.

Zeenyx AscentialTest supports automation processes across WPF, web, and Electron technologies. It offers object recognition with snapshot technology and reusable steps, simplifying test creation and management. Its compatibility with SVN, JIRA, and Jenkins facilitates CI/CD integration. Especially beneficial for PowerBuilder applications, it enhances efficiency with robust data handling features. Although it could improve navigation and UI design, suggested additions such as cloud-based licenses and debugger integration are promising.

What are AscentialTest's key features?

Object recognition: Simplifies test creation with snapshot technology.
Drag and drop interface: Facilitates ease of use and saves time.
Reusable steps and TestSet: Enhances test efficiency and management.
Integration: Supports continuous integration with tools like SVN, JIRA, and Jenkins.
PowerBuilder support: Streamlines testing in complex environments.
Form control recognition: Aids in dynamic web testing.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating AscentialTest?

Time efficiency: Through simplified test creation and maintenance.
Improved integration: Facilitates seamless testing processes within CI/CD frameworks.
Data handling: Enhanced accuracy in testing through advanced data management capabilities.
Cross-platform support: Effectively handles WPF, web, and Electron technologies.

In industries requiring robust testing for dynamic environments, Zeenyx AscentialTest is implemented for data-driven testing and large dataset analysis. Its multi-database support eases the verification process, unifying objects, steps, and test frameworks. Integration from test database installation to automated report generation ensures efficient workflows.

Zeenyx

Sample Customers

Virgin Media, Paychex, Rabobank, R+V, Discover

TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.

Buyer's Guide

Perfecto vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

September 2026

Free Report: Perfecto vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Find out what your peers are saying about Perfecto vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Perfecto vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.