We performed a comparison between Pentera and Rapid7 InsightVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"The product is easy to use."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"I really love the new platform. It is really easy to understand, use, and deploy."
"The solution scales well."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the vulnerability scan."
"This solution's most useful feature is that it is entirely a single-page application."
"I have been in contact with technical support and they are not bad."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"The price could be improved."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"It is still not a fully cloud-based solution. It will be helpful for customers if it is a complete cloud solution. It is a hybrid solution at the moment."
"There are not enough templates, and the reporting is weak with this solution."
"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."
"I would like to see more integration."
"There are end-user needs and expectations that are being overlooked in the development that could be addressed by appointing a customer advisory board."
"Technical support does not respond quickly."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
Pentera is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews. Pentera is rated 8.2, while Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Picus Security, Horizon3.ai and Veracode, whereas Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.