Pantheon vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry comparison

Pantheon and Broadcom are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Pantheon is ranked #24, while Broadcom is ranked #13. Pantheon holds a 0.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to Broadcom’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pantheon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Pantheon

Read 2 Pantheon reviews

833 Views
425 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Read 15 Pivotal Cloud Foundry reviews

4,913 Views
4,864 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pantheon

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Pantheon and Pivotal Cloud Foundry are cloud-based platforms in web hosting and application deployment. Pantheon is recognized for its pricing and ease of use, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is favored for its extensive features.

Features: Pantheon provides intuitive dashboard management, seamless website updates, and performance optimizations, focusing on web operations. Pivotal Cloud Foundry offers scalability, automation, and integration support, suitable for enterprise-level applications. Pantheon emphasizes simplicity in web management, whereas Pivotal Cloud Foundry supplies tools for complex development needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pantheon offers straightforward deployment and accessible support, ideal for newcomers in web management. Pivotal Cloud Foundry presents more complex deployment, complemented by comprehensive documentation and strategic support for experienced development teams.

Pricing and ROI: Pantheon delivers a cost-effective setup, providing value and strong ROI for web-focused businesses. Pivotal Cloud Foundry, with higher initial costs, ensures long-term ROI through scalability and enterprise-grade features. The decision between them depends on budget and project requirements, with Pantheon appealing to cost-sensitive users and Pivotal Cloud Foundry attracting those seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pantheon

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

24th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Hosting Services (10th)

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Pantheon is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is 7.2%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pivotal Cloud Foundry	7.2%
Pantheon	0.9%
Other	91.9%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Abhinand Gokhala K

Technical Lead at Bigone Technologies

The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools

We are a software development company. We recommend solutions to our clients, but they ask us to compare it with other solutions. Clients compare the monthly costs of Pantheon with other servers and ask us to create the same environment in dedicated servers. If Pantheon reduces its cost, we can confidently suggest it to clients. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2263239

Head of Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

PCF allows for fine-grained configuration, especially regarding scaling but routing limitations

Something that can be done better is canary deployment. So, right now, we're using blue-green deployment. The support for canary deployment would be nice. A few things, such as what OpenShift does better are cluster management. Like, you can manage the entire thing together. Currently, it's possible to manage all the clusters, especially when it comes to cluster management using straightforward configuration. As of now, we have to handle each application instance individually, which means servicing them one by one. It would be better if we could perform these actions as a group or in a more streamlined manner. One more downside is actually the cost of this environment. So, major downside of Pivotal, it's the cost. So, the runtime running costs are very high. Extremely high.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."

"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to scale. The services that connect to the database are also very good."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very robust, especially for building Java."

"I find the ease of deployment and management of microservices to be the most valuable features. The platform also has good auto-scaling capabilities."

"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the deployment is easier."

"The solution is stable and resilient. In our company, we do not even see any challenges with the solution."

"It supports CI/CD, and is integrated with the CI/CD very well."

"We find its stability and scalability valuable."

"Stability is not a concern with this product."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry pros

Cons

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."

"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is not scalable, infinitely, because when you install it on a set of virtual machines it is very hard to scale. It's easy to scale on an application level, but not it is not similar to if you were using Amazon. Amazon you can scale thousands of applications."

"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."

"In the next release, they should offer additional applications for the databases, and improve the deployment experience."

"The Pivotal Cloud Foundry's initial setup has a learning curve for my team, but it was easy to use."

"I'd like to see a larger service offering."

"There is a lot of uncertainty surrounding the future of Pivotal Cloud Foundry."

"The user interface should be simpler to navigate because it t can take time for users to learn it."

"Regarding the setup phase, every step is a hurdle. With Pivotal Cloud Foundry, I won't get any proper resources for that. Even if I Google it, there is no proper solution for Pivotal Cloud Foundry."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems."

"We do pay for the licensing cost because we have opted for a private cloud setup. So, it is a cloud setup, and we have to make payments based on the cloud size. I do not consider it very costly when comparing it to the market."

"You're paying for the number of virtual machines you want to install in the installation."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is based on the customer's requirements. However, the price is comparable to other similar solutions."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve. However, in this category of solutions, they are all expensive."

"Licensing is on a monthly basis and right now we pay $24/month. There are no other costs over and above that."

"The pricing is on the higher side and there are cheaper options available."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

37%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Pantheon

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Pantheon

Compared 16% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Pantheon

Compared 14% of the time

Acquia Cloud vs Pantheon

Compared 11% of the time

Kinsta vs Pantheon

Compared 11% of the time

More Pantheon Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 35% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 14% of the time

Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 5% of the time

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

January 2026

Download Pantheon product report

Buyer's Guide

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

January 2026

Download Pivotal Cloud Foundry product report

Also Known As

No data available

PCF, Pivotal Application Service (PAS), Pivotal Container Service (PKS), Pivotal Function Service (PFS)

Overview

Pantheon is the world’s fastest hosting for Drupal and WordPress. It comes down to our super-efficient container-based platform. Multiple independent benchmarks have compared Pantheon with other providers, and we consistently come out on top.

Pantheon

Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) is the leading enterprise PaaS, powered by Cloud Foundry. PCF provides a cloud-native application platform that allows you to continuously deliver any app to every major private and public cloud with a single platform. PCF is proven to accelerate feature delivery with higher developer productivity and a 200:1 developer to operator ratio. PCF's built-in security and self-healing capabilities reduce risk in your app portfolio while maintaining high-availability at scale to keep customer facing systems online even in the most challenging circumstances. pivotal.io

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Patch, Maine Today, Alley Interactice, Scranton Gillette, AdRoll, Cisco, nVidia, Boston Herald, Tableau, Dell, Kyriba, Huddle, IBM

Humana, Citibank, Mercedes Benz, Liberty Mutual, The Home Depot, GE, West Corp, Merrill Corporation, CoreLogic, Orange, Dish Network, Comcast, Bloomberg, Internal Revenue Service, Ford Motor Company, Garmin, Volkswagen, Solera, Allstate, US Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, ScotiaBank

Buyer's Guide

Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

December 2025

Free Report: Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.