Pantheon vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry comparison

Pantheon and VMware are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Pantheon is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.5, while VMware is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Pantheon holds a 0.7% mindshare in PSP, compared to VMware’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pantheon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of VMware users who would recommend it.

Pantheon

Read 2 Pantheon reviews

421 Views
336 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Read 15 Pivotal Cloud Foundry reviews

7,551 Views
6,345 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Pantheon

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Pantheon and Pivotal Cloud Foundry are cloud-based platforms in web hosting and application deployment. Pantheon is recognized for its pricing and ease of use, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is favored for its extensive features.

Features: Pantheon provides intuitive dashboard management, seamless website updates, and performance optimizations, focusing on web operations. Pivotal Cloud Foundry offers scalability, automation, and integration support, suitable for enterprise-level applications. Pantheon emphasizes simplicity in web management, whereas Pivotal Cloud Foundry supplies tools for complex development needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pantheon offers straightforward deployment and accessible support, ideal for newcomers in web management. Pivotal Cloud Foundry presents more complex deployment, complemented by comprehensive documentation and strategic support for experienced development teams.

Pricing and ROI: Pantheon delivers a cost-effective setup, providing value and strong ROI for web-focused businesses. Pivotal Cloud Foundry, with higher initial costs, ensures long-term ROI through scalability and enterprise-grade features. The decision between them depends on budget and project requirements, with Pantheon appealing to cost-sensitive users and Pivotal Cloud Foundry attracting those seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pantheon

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Hosting Services (10th)

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Pantheon is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is 10.2%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Abhinand Gokhala K

Technical Lead at Bigone Technologies

The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools

We are a software development company. We recommend solutions to our clients, but they ask us to compare it with other solutions. Clients compare the monthly costs of Pantheon with other servers and ask us to create the same environment in dedicated servers. If Pantheon reduces its cost, we can confidently suggest it to clients. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Vasundhara Joshi

Senior Software Engineer at Wells Fargo

Seamlessly scalable since applications written in Java and .NET do not create issues for its users

Regarding the setup phase, every step is a hurdle. With Pivotal Cloud Foundry, I won't get any proper resources for that. Even if I Google it, there is no proper solution for Pivotal Cloud Foundry. However, if we go for Azure or some other cloud, we can get a lot of information. I believe there is not much information for Pivotal Cloud Foundry since it may be some license issue. If you go for Azure, the migration process is straightforward. Since we have been given 10 GB of space in the public cloud, we are utilizing it in our company. So, we are trying to deploy our application on the cloud, and for us, it is like a trial process for now. From our total application rate, I can say that only two to three percent is on Pivotal Cloud Foundry. Currently, half of the code is in the shell script, which is causing issues. Also, most people in my organization have worked on Java-related code. For most of the applications, they are using the same, that is, shell script and AUTOsist, and so we haven't migrated yet. So that is the reason that we are planning to opt for a hybrid model so that we don't have to migrate completely to Pivotal Cloud Foundry.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."

"PCF is open, so the applications run really smoothly and with little downtime."

"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is the UI, it is easy to use."

"We find its stability and scalability valuable."

"I find the ease of deployment and management of microservices to be the most valuable features. The platform also has good auto-scaling capabilities."

"Stability is not a concern with this product."

"It provides a set of developer-friendly tools that simplify application deployment."

"It is a scalable product...We are not facing any particular issues since most of the applications in our company are written in Java and .NET."

"It supports CI/CD, and is integrated with the CI/CD very well."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry pros

Cons

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."

"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."

"I'd like to see a larger service offering."

"In the next release, they should offer additional applications for the databases, and improve the deployment experience."

"The user interface should be simpler to navigate because it t can take time for users to learn it."

"It is not straightforward to setup."

"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve on the technology it is a bit complex."

"There are no synthetic application monitoring and real-time monitoring features."

"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve the documentation. They are good, but they could improve more. Additionally, it would be beneficial if there were more use case examples."

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems."

"Licensing is on a monthly basis and right now we pay $24/month. There are no other costs over and above that."

"We do pay for the licensing cost because we have opted for a private cloud setup. So, it is a cloud setup, and we have to make payments based on the cloud size. I do not consider it very costly when comparing it to the market."

"The pricing is on the higher side and there are cheaper options available."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve. However, in this category of solutions, they are all expensive."

"You're paying for the number of virtual machines you want to install in the installation."

"The price of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is based on the customer's requirements. However, the price is comparable to other similar solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

Financial Services Firm

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

38%

Manufacturing Company

19%

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pantheon?

Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pantheon?

The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pantheon?

Pantheon's design is not familiar to use. It could be more user-friendly.

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about Pivotal Cloud Foundry?

I find the ease of deployment and management of microservices to be the most valuable features. The platform also has good auto-scaling capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pivotal Cloud Foundry?

I would say it is around a nine out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. Just short of Oracle. It's sort of Oracle cloud.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Pantheon

Compared 42% of the time

Kinsta vs Pantheon

Compared 11% of the time

Vercel vs Pantheon

Compared 11% of the time

Acquia Cloud vs Pantheon

Compared 10% of the time

GoDaddy vs Pantheon

Compared 9% of the time

More Pantheon Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 33% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 31% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 10% of the time

Heroku vs Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Compared 5% of the time

More Pivotal Cloud Foundry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

April 2025

Download Pantheon product report

Buyer's Guide

Pivotal Cloud Foundry

April 2025

Download Pivotal Cloud Foundry product report

Also Known As

No data available

PCF, Pivotal Application Service (PAS), Pivotal Container Service (PKS), Pivotal Function Service (PFS)

Overview

Pantheon is the world’s fastest hosting for Drupal and WordPress. It comes down to our super-efficient container-based platform. Multiple independent benchmarks have compared Pantheon with other providers, and we consistently come out on top.

Pantheon

Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) is the leading enterprise PaaS, powered by Cloud Foundry. PCF provides a cloud-native application platform that allows you to continuously deliver any app to every major private and public cloud with a single platform. PCF is proven to accelerate feature delivery with higher developer productivity and a 200:1 developer to operator ratio. PCF's built-in security and self-healing capabilities reduce risk in your app portfolio while maintaining high-availability at scale to keep customer facing systems online even in the most challenging circumstances. pivotal.io

VMware

Sample Customers

Patch, Maine Today, Alley Interactice, Scranton Gillette, AdRoll, Cisco, nVidia, Boston Herald, Tableau, Dell, Kyriba, Huddle, IBM

Humana, Citibank, Mercedes Benz, Liberty Mutual, The Home Depot, GE, West Corp, Merrill Corporation, CoreLogic, Orange, Dish Network, Comcast, Bloomberg, Internal Revenue Service, Ford Motor Company, Garmin, Volkswagen, Solera, Allstate, US Air Force, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, ScotiaBank

Buyer's Guide

Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

April 2025

Free Report: Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry

Find out what your peers are saying about Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pantheon vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.