"It's quite stable and scalable. The price is good as well."
"It is easy to use."
"The payment structure is very good."
"The pricing aspect of the product is pretty reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
"AWS is stable."
"Amazon AWS contains a lot of helpful services."
"It is enough for us in terms of features. We don't have too many transactions, and it is sufficient for our current needs."
"AWS is easy to manage."
"PCF is open, so the applications run really smoothly and with little downtime."
"Stability is not a concern with this product."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the deployment is easier."
"If you have not had previous training or studied guides it will be a little difficult to use the solution. However, the difficulty also depends on what you are using the solution for. They can improve by providing more documentation, such as tutorials and videos."
"It works very well with open-source solutions like Java, but not with .NET technologies."
"The price could be better. Support for data analytics could be better. I don't see much support for data analytics. They have a lot of support in Azure, but I don't see a lot of innovation on the data analytics side in AWS."
"The price of the solution is comparatively quite high in comparison with that of Azure."
"The solution could offer better integration capabilities."
"The pricing could be a bit high at times. It's something they could improve upon."
"While feasible, custom configuration will be more time consuming than standard."
"When you are first starting, the initial setup can be a bit complex, but it gets easier after that."
"The user interface should be simpler to navigate because it t can take time for users to learn it."
"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."
"It is not straightforward to setup."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in PaaS Clouds with 148 reviews while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is ranked 9th in PaaS Clouds with 3 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Flexible, scales well, and offers good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pivotal Cloud Foundry writes "Open-source makes it cost-effective, but the interface needs to be improved". Amazon AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform, IBM Public Cloud and Google App Engine, whereas Pivotal Cloud Foundry is most compared with Microsoft Azure, OpenShift, VMware Tanzu Application Service, Google Cloud and Google App Engine. See our Amazon AWS vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
