Pantheon vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Pantheon
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Web Hosting Services (6th)
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Pantheon is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 14.9%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
Unique Categories:
Web Hosting Services
3.8%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Abhinand Gokhala K - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 28, 2023
The product is user-friendly and performs well, but it is very costly compared to other tools
I use the solution to create an upstream and to create multiple sites from that upstream The product allows users to create multiple development environments. I'm satisfied with the performance and the user-friendliness of the solution. Our clients are also happy. Hosting Drupal is very good in…
Arun Sahani - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 21, 2023
A tool that offers a good production environment that is much more stable
I have not used it on IBM Cloud. It is basically used on AWS and Azure. I am using a standard OpenShift. OpenShift is a container orchestration tool. We have been using it for hosting products on container-based applications Actually, what happens is that the solution gives or provides that kind…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"We have found the cluster management function to be very good with this product."
"It's cloud agnostic and the containerization and security features are outstanding."
"The scalability of OpenShift combined with Kubernetes is good. At least from the software standpoint, it becomes quite easy to handle the scalability through configuration. You need to constantly monitor the underlying infrastructure and ensure that it has adequate provisioning. If you have enough infrastructure, then managing the scalability is quite easy which is done through configuration."
"The most valuable feature is the auto scalers for all microservices. The feature allows us to place request limits and it is much cheaper than AWS."
"It is a stable platform."
"The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the containers."
"I love to automate everything and OpenShift was been born for that. It takes care of the network layer itself and I don't need to dive into it; I can work on a top level. Our project has numerous services designed to run in Docker containers, and we have run almost all pieces in OpenShift."
"I am impressed with the product's security features."
 

Cons

"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."
"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."
"There are challenges related to additional security layers, connectivity compliance for endpoints, and integration."
"The metrics in OpenShift can use improvement."
"We need some kind of a multi-cluster management solution from the Red Hat site."
"OpenShift's storage management could be better."
"Documentation and technical support could be improved. The product is good, but when we raise a case with support—say we are having an image issue—the support is not really up to the mark. It is difficult to get support... When we raise a case, their support people will hesitate to get on a call or a screen-sharing session. That is a major drawback when it comes to OpenShift."
"I want easier node management and more user-friendly scripts for installing master and worker nodes."
"The tool lacks some features to make it compliant with Kubernetes"
"There is no orchestration platform in OpenShift."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems."
"We had a Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) license for all our servers' operating systems. By having multiple Red Hat products together, you can negotiate costs and leverage on having a sort of enterprise license agreement to reduce the overall outlay or TCO."
"Pricing of OpenShift depends on the number of nodes and who is hosting it."
"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"The product has reasonable pricing."
"We use the license-free version of Red Hat Openshift but we pay for the support."
"The price depends on the type and the nature of the organizations, along with the types of projects that are of considerable range."
"My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
University
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pantheon?
Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pantheon?
The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems.
What needs improvement with Pantheon?
Pantheon's design is not familiar to use. It could be more user-friendly.
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What do you like most about OpenShift?
OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Patch, Maine Today, Alley Interactice, Scranton Gillette, AdRoll, Cisco, nVidia, Boston Herald, Tableau, Dell, Kyriba, Huddle, IBM
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about Pantheon vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.