Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

Sangfor and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Sangfor is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.1, while WatchGuard is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.8. Sangfor holds a 0.7% mindshare in EDR, compared to WatchGuard’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Read 11 Sangfor Endpoint Secure reviews

1,647 Views
1,631 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WatchGuard EPDR

Read 37 WatchGuard EPDR reviews

4,812 Views
3,128 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

WatchGuard EPDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Sangfor Endpoint Secure and WatchGuard EPDR are two prominent endpoint protection solutions. WatchGuard EPDR tends to be superior due to its comprehensive feature set and emphasis on automated responses.

Features: Users appreciate Sangfor Endpoint Secure for its robust threat detection, response capabilities, and competitive pricing. WatchGuard EPDR is praised for its advanced threat hunting, automated response features, and comprehensive customer service.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve its integration with other security tools, enhance reporting capabilities, and optimize resource usage. WatchGuard EPDR users recommend better performance in resource usage, more granular control over certain security policies, and improved integration with existing frameworks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sangfor Endpoint Secure is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. WatchGuard EPDR has positive feedback for ease of deployment and is particularly recognized for its comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Sangfor Endpoint Secure users find the product to be competitively priced with speedy ROI. WatchGuard EPDR is perceived as more expensive but justified by its advanced feature set, leading to strong returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,869 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WatchGuard EPDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WatchGuard EPDR	1.9%
Sangfor Endpoint Secure	0.7%
Other	97.4%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Faiz Ul Mobin Khan

Team Lead Enterprise at Feroze1888 Mills Ltd

With a straightforward setup phase in place, the tool ensures that its users get to experience a return on investment

An awful thing that happens in Sangfor Endpoint Secure is when I click on its different options every time. When I go to the product's main page and click on an option completely, another window pops out, which is annoying. Every navigation option in the tool has its own window that doesn't open within itself. Every time I click on any button for navigation purposes, it opens another tab. The aforementioned aspect of the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In the future, adding reporting functionalities to the tool would be a good idea. Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities.

Read full review

PaolaLamura

SOC & Incident Manager at Retelit

While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI

I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"The real-time monitoring feature of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is truly real-time, with no delay compared to other solutions."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"The user-friendliness of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is particularly impressive. Even with basic technical knowledge, users can easily navigate the system, make changes, and implement updates."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"It prevents our users from circumventing security. Everything is password protected so they can't get into it. They can't uninstall it. They can't do anything."

"The detection capabilities for malicious activities are effective."

"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."

"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."

"I can put tons of load on it."

"It allows us to stop activation windows."

"What is really great about Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is its console in the cloud, and it can keep the inventory of software in the PC."

"WatchGuard EPDR improves organization primarily by supporting the IT team rather than the end users directly. It helps IT teams accomplish more with fewer people. One of its standout features is the patch management solution, which allows companies without up-to-date services like WSUS to manage patches for Windows and Linux systems. Additionally, it provides the usual endpoint protection features such as virus and malware protection, application control, and website control."

More WatchGuard EPDR pros

Cons

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"I face issues while migrating from Kaspersky to Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."

"Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is not compatible with certain network devices like access points, switches, or routers, which would be an area for improvement."

"Panda Security Adaptive Defense can improve by including the intrusion and prevention system not only on their most expensive platform. Additionally, it blocks software that is legitimate from users. They complain and then we have to manually unblock the software, by hash, or we receive a message. Some of the prevention features are not available and this might cause us to need a separate firewall or something to protect the company."

"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive. When a URL is not categorized, I face issues."

"An area for improvement would be the software deployment to seamlessly deploy software packages across multiple machines simultaneously, and to enhance the remote monitoring capabilities."

"The categories in the web filtering should be more comprehensive."

"It needs improvements in its EDR and its ability to manage all the nodes. I'd like better communication between the console and the nodes, so I don't have to remote into each individual machine that's having an issue with the protection."

More WatchGuard EPDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."

"The solution's pricing is better compared to other products."

"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."

"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."

"The solution is priced well for what features it provides."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."

"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."

"The product is available at a high price."

More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Hospitality Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

See all answers

What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?

The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?

The price of the solution is okay. It's all right.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?

I would not be able to say what areas of WatchGuard EPDR have improved, as I do not work with the product myself so much anymore. I just used to assist with installation and deployment, especially ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 23% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 13% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 9% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cloud vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 6% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 15% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs WatchGuard EPDR

Compared 4% of the time

More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

October 2025

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

WatchGuard EPDR

October 2025

Download WatchGuard EPDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

Panda Adaptive Defense 360

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc.
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall.
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR

September 2025

Free Report: Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.