Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

Sangfor and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Sangfor is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.7, while Broadcom is ranked #48 with an average rating of 7.0. Sangfor holds a 0.8% mindshare in EDR, compared to Broadcom’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Sangfor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Sangfor Endpoint Secure are two prominent products in the cybersecurity market. Sangfor Endpoint Secure seems to be a superior product due to its advanced features, which users feel are worth the price.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response offers robust threat detection, incident response, and automated investigation. Users appreciate its comprehensive security measures. Sangfor Endpoint Secure is praised for its advanced threat detection capabilities, real-time protection, and ease of use. The key difference is that Sangfor's real-time protection and user-friendly design give it an edge.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response users suggest enhancing the system's speed, reducing false positives, and better integration with other security tools. Sangfor Endpoint Secure users recommend improving support documentation, adding more customization options, and feel the need for better documentation is a significant gap compared to Symantec's requirement for faster and more accurate threat detection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is noted for its straightforward installation process and efficient customer support. Sangfor Endpoint Secure also offers easy deployment but receives mixed reviews on customer service efficiency. Symantec's consistent customer service quality provides an advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is considered cost-effective with good ROI by users. Sangfor Endpoint Secure is viewed as pricier but justified by its superior features, leading to satisfactory ROI. The deciding factor often comes down to budget constraints versus feature requirements, with Sangfor's advanced capabilities justifying its higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Sangfor Endpoint Secure	0.8%
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response	0.7%
Other	95.1%

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Ovais Abbas

Coordinator Associate at National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases

Quick threat response and behavior analysis while enhancing network security

The main use case is usually related to security. It deals with attacks that come day-to-day such as zero-day attacks and APT attacks. Our main task is to secure the network infrastructure in the hospital where I work It facilitates the departments of IT and other departments to procure and…

Read full review

Hamid Harroud

IT Director at Al Akhawayn University

A highly stable and affordable solution for detecting and preventing security threats

The solution needs to provide better integration. We may receive things from email, network, or the machine itself. So we need a centralized system to get alerts or messages which are not available in the product. The solution must provide features to centralize the alerts received. It should provide integration with other Symantec products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are incident creation, policy-based protection, IP whitelisting, and device encryption. These are beneficial for endpoint and server security."

"Cortex XDR can integrate the firewalls and determine the tendencies of the attacks. It's a new generation antivirus, with protection endpoints and detection response. It is very easy to use and everybody can operate the solution."

"It integrates well into the environment."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"The integrations are out-of-the-box, as are the playbooks."

"Palo Alto is constantly adding new features."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks saves time in various ways, although the user interface is fairly standard."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"The real-time monitoring feature of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is truly real-time, with no delay compared to other solutions."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"The tool's AI feature is helpful in endpoint security."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The solution can scale well."

"In Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response, the most valuable features are threat hunting and that customers can gather logs from multiple computers and servers in one place."

"I like Symantec EDR's device control and USB security features."

"The most valuable feature is that the same agent can act as the endpoint detection and response agent."

"The security is good."

"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is its ability to conduct large scans on the endpoints without affecting the network."

"The Detection vulnerability is very effective."

"A great feature of this solution is that it is very well-integrated with antivirus software."

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response pros

Cons

"The solution should force customers to integrate with network traffic to see the full benefits of XDR."

"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response). Then it would work well with SIEM Response."

"The solution lacks real-time, on-demand antivirus."

"There are some third-party solutions that are difficult to integrate with, which is something that can be improved."

"The solution eats memory of the computer, unlike anything I've ever seen."

"There are some limitations on the Traps agents."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"To jump from the partner to Palo Alto directly was challenging."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure should include healing capabilities."

"The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered."

"It would be much more convenient if the migration tool could be installed directly on the customer's VMs, enabling a smoother migration process to the new infrastructure, with potential restrictions addressed accordingly."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"They need to improve their cloud presence."

"Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response could improve the reporting. It is very difficult to create reports from the user interface."

"Technical support is not as good as we expect, and resolving problems should be more timely."

"It would be good if it can anticipate zero-day attacks. I don't know how it can be done and if it is even a feature of this product."

"In the future, it would be nice to have playbooks in the tool, to allow for some of the common activities to be automated. For example, some of the scannings of the malware can be too manual for a specific device. Additionally, a vulnerability manager would be beneficial."

"While they are quite dynamic, they need to ensure they are detecting threats faster in the future to keep people safer."

"Its UI could be more user-friendly."

"I would like to see better scanning capabilities."

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cortex XDR is a costly solution."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"The price is reasonable."

"The price is really high and it should be lower."

"Of late, because of the Broadcom purchase, its price has been increasing."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The price is okay, but it really depends on the customer's requirements."

"The product is cheap."

"It's a yearly subscription."

"Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is expensive."

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

At first, people might not understand the interface, which is why it should be simplified. However, once they underst...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response?

I am not aware of the pricing details, as that falls under the management's responsibility.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response?

While the prices for technical issues in Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response are good, as a partner of Symantec,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response?

Different companies such as banks and local government in Poland use Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response because...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 12% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 6% of the time

Open EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 6% of the time

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 5% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Compared 6% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

February 2026

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

February 2026

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response report

Download Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is a powerful security solution designed to help organizations proactively detect, investigate, and mitigate advanced threats across their endpoint environments. As part of Broadcom's cybersecurity portfolio, Symantec EDR provides comprehensive visibility into endpoint activities, enabling security teams to quickly identify and respond to threats that evade traditional defenses.

Symantec EDR leverages machine learning, behavioral analysis, and global threat intelligence from Symantec's vast network to detect sophisticated threats, including zero-day attacks, ransomware, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). This allows organizations to identify malicious activities early and respond swiftly to mitigate potential damage. The solution offers automated response options that enable security teams to contain and remediate threats quickly.

Symantec EDR provides detailed forensic capabilities, allowing security analysts to dive deep into endpoint data, investigate incidents thoroughly, and understand the scope and impact of attacks. Features such as timeline analysis, incident graphing, and the ability to isolate endpoints enhance investigative efforts and support effective remediation strategies.

With its centralized management console, Symantec EDR offers visibility across the entire endpoint environment, regardless of the operating systems or whether endpoints are on-premise or remote. Symantec EDR seamlessly integrates with other Symantec security solutions, enhancing its detection capabilities and enabling a unified approach to threat management. Its scalable architecture ensures that businesses of all sizes can benefit from its advanced security features without compromising performance.

Quickly discover and resolve threats with deep endpoint visibility and superior detection analytics, reducing mean time to remediation. Overcome cyber security skills shortages and streamline SOC operations with extensive automation and built-in integrations for sandboxing, SIEM, and orchestration.

Fortify security teams with the unmatched expertise and global scale of Symantec Managed Endpoint Detection and Response services.
Roll out Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) across Windows, macOS, and Linux devices using Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP)-integrated EDR or a dissolvable agent.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

March 2026

Free Report: Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response

Find out what your peers are saying about Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.