"Everything has been okay with the solution. We are using all of the features."
"For those who want a next-gen firewall that's easy to configure and easy to operate, I think you should go for Palo Alto."
"I like the solution's interface."
"Edge protection is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly, has interesting features, URL filtering, and threat prevention."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"This is a good security product."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"The technology firewall anomaly network could stand improvement."
"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."
"The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
Threats do not discriminate between application delivery vectors, requiring an approach that has full visibility into all application traffic, including SSL encrypted content, with full user context. Threat Prevention leverages the visibility of our next-generation firewall to inspect all traffic, automatically preventing known threats, regardless of port, protocol or SSL encryption.
Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is ranked 12th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 5 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 11th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 3 reviews. Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is rated 8.8, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention writes "Easy to configure and easy to operate with great stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Stable, with good automation capabilities, however, we want to be able to automate even more". Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, Check Point IPS and Cisco NGIPS, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, ELK Elasticsearch, Exabeam Fusion SIEM and Securonix Security Analytics. See our Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.
See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.