We performed a comparison between Oracle Java DB and Oracle Multitenant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"There have been no issues in relation to stability. We've never really had do to any recoveries. It is very stable."
"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"The solution is stable."
"It's very clever."
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"
"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."
"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."
"It's easy to use and works great."
"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."
"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."
"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."
"You can scale the solution as needed."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."
"The user interface for this solution can be made better."
"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."
"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."
"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."
"Technical support could be faster."
"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 23rd in Relational Databases Tools with 7 reviews while Oracle Multitenant is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.2, while Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "Ability to handle large volumes and data sets but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command ". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, Oracle Database, SQL Server, SAP HANA and Apache Derby, whereas Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and SAP HANA. See our Oracle Java DB vs. Oracle Multitenant report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
