We performed a comparison between Oracle Multitenant and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to use and works great."
"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."
"The most valuable features are the speed and ease of use."
"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."
"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."
"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."
"You can scale the solution as needed."
"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"
"The most valuable feature of SAP HANA is the interaction it provides with external suppliers and clients."
"SAP HANA's best features are its programmability and extensibility - you can size and shape the software however you need."
"It has a very huge bandwidth and data transfer."
"SAP HANA's interface is pretty user-friendly."
"I like the integration process. Also, the data is trusted by our management, and we use the data from transactions for analysis."
"SAP HANA is vertically and horizontally scalable."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"The speed at which it gets the data is great."
"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."
"The user interface for this solution can be made better."
"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."
"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."
"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."
"Technical support could be faster."
"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."
"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."
"The pricing is expensive."
"The inclusion of a well-performing Time Machine is vital."
"When we are using SAP HANA we have some difficulty with the customization. We would like to be able to add and make customized menus."
"Ease of use could be improved in SAP HANA. I like SAP because SAP solutions can be used by anyone, which means even laymen can start working on SAP tools, but in SAP HANA modeling, you'll need to know some other technologies and sequel scripting, and you need a separate skillset, so if you don't have the skillset, you won't be able to work on SAP HANA. Making SAP HANA low-code would make it even better."
"I give the scalability of SAP HANA a six out of ten."
"The surface side or Attack dashboard needs improvement because there are some gaps after sales services."
"They should develop and improve the solution's data management system."
"The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept."
Oracle Multitenant is ranked 16th in Relational Databases Tools with 15 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 79 reviews. Oracle Multitenant is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Oracle Multitenant writes "Databases are automatically upgraded and cloning of pluggable databases requires just one command ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". Oracle Multitenant is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and MariaDB, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Apache Spark. See our Oracle Multitenant vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.