Oracle Java Cloud Service vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Oracle and Red Hat are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Oracle is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 0.7% mindshare in PSP, compared to Red Hat’s 10.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews

491 Views
383 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 63 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

10,672 Views
6,296 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Oracle Java Cloud Service and Red Hat OpenShift are both strong contenders in cloud application deployment. Red Hat OpenShift has the upper hand due to its Kubernetes-based flexible container orchestration capabilities, making it ideal for scalability and microservices.

Features: Oracle Java Cloud Service seamlessly integrates with Oracle's databases and enterprise applications, creating a unified environment for Java solutions. It notably supports on-premise application development using popular IDEs and boasts easy middleware platform deployment. Red Hat OpenShift is valued for its automation and containerization features, customization with Kubernetes, and fast application deployment using source-to-image conversion.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Java Cloud Service could improve scalability and flexibility outside Oracle's ecosystem, ease integration with non-Oracle tools, and enhance native support for containers. Red Hat OpenShift might benefit from more straightforward deployment processes, less complexity in managing Kubernetes, and improved out-of-the-box performance monitoring tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Java Cloud Service offers straightforward setup, tapping into Oracle's extensive support channels, favorably fitting existing Oracle users. Red Hat OpenShift, while more complex to deploy because of Kubernetes architecture, provides robust support for containerized applications helping organizations committed to DevOps and microservices architectures.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Java Cloud Service generally involves a higher setup cost aligned with its premium enterprise focus, yet it offers good ROI for Oracle users through optimized enterprise integrations. Red Hat OpenShift offers a flexible pricing model potentially leading to lower upfront costs, with long-term savings from operational efficiency gains in container-driven strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Virtualization Software (11th), Container Management (10th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (5th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 10.5%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Red Hat OpenShift	10.5%
Oracle Java Cloud Service	0.7%
Other	88.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Adam Elguennioui

SAP Consultant at SA&BC

Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users

The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Read full review

Pratul Shukla

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Adopting a flexible and efficient approach with noticeable improvements in operational costs and continued challenges in job management

Currently, one of the biggest challenges we face is with services and jobs. For spawning batches, although it has crons, it is not easy to integrate with enterprise systems such as Autosys. The entire company uses Autosys, but we are not able to integrate it effectively. We need intermediate servers to run OC utility commands and initiate the cron job. We have to do a lot of modifications to ensure our batches work properly. With physical or virtual servers, even in AWS, we are able to write and manage multiple jobs. Managing batches in Red Hat OpenShift has been a significant challenge. Integrating third parties is a challenge with Red Hat OpenShift. For example, with Elasticsearch, onboarding itself was difficult, running file beats and dealing with routing issues. It is not straightforward, especially since we have some components in AWS as. AWS has many capabilities that come out of the box and are easier to work with compared to Red Hat OpenShift. Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services. The main reason we went with Red Hat OpenShift was because it is a private cloud, and we have regulatory requirements that prevent us from using public cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's technical support is good."

"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."

"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."

"It is pretty easy to use."

"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."

"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."

"The framework supports auto-configuration. A lot of features are already there. It is reliable and user-friendly to develop code, back-end engineering, or locate specific information such as addresses."

"Cloud has provided less maintenance."

More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the great customer service and the ability for our team to get assistance when we need it."

"OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes."

"The developers seem to like the source-to-image feature. That makes it easy for them to deploy an application from code into containers, so they don't have to think about things. They take it straight from their code into a containerized application. If you don't have OpenShift, you have to build the container and then deploy the container to, say, EKS or something like that."

"OpenShift is more enterprise-oriented, offers good support, and provides integration with multiple solutions."

"OpenShift is based on Kubernetes and we try to use all the Kubernetes objects of OpenShift. We don't use features that are specific to OpenShift, except internal certificates for the services. The one feature that is missing from Kubernetes and that is really useful in OpenShift is the lifecycle of the cluster and the ease of installation. We use VMware and VMware integration internally with the OpenShift installer, which is very good. With OpenShift it's easy to spin up or scale out a cluster."

"We are currently dealing with both local support and Red Hat support, and they have been amazing."

"Valuable features include auto-recreate of pod if pod fails; fast rollback, with one click, to previous version."

"The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the security context constraint (SCC). The solution’s security throughout the stack is good. And security context constraints provide port-level security. It's a granular level of control, where you can give privileges to certain users to work on certain applications."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."

"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."

"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."

"The latest 4.0 version of OpenShift disabled a few of the features we previously made use of, although this wasn't a huge deal."

"The solution only offers support for one server."

"This solution could be improved by offering best practices on standardization and additional guidance on how to use this solution."

"Not a ten because it's not a standard solution and the endpoint protection user has to prepare with documentation or have training from other people. It's not easy to start because it's not like other solutions."

"The whole area around the hybrid cloud could be improved. I would like to deploy a Red Hat OpenShift cluster on-premise and on the cloud, then have Red Hat do the entire hybrid cloud management."

"Needs work on volume handling (although this is already better with GlusterFS). Security (SSSD) would also be an improvement."

"They could work on the pricing model, making it more flexible and possibly lower."

"Credential not hidden, so people on the same group can view it."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."

"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."

"I don't deal with the cost part, but I know that the cost is very high when compared to other products. They charge for CPU and memory, but we don't worry about it."

"The pricing for OpenShift includes support and licensing, which costs approximately $400."

"The model of pricing and buying licences is quite rigid. We are in the process of negotiating on demand pricing which will help us take advantage of the cloud as a whole."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."

"The product's support is expensive. I would rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?

I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?

See all answers

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift?

OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 30% of the time

Oracle Application Container Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 24% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 22% of the time

More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Proxmox VE vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service

December 2025

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

December 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Overview

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?

Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift

December 2025

Free Report: Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Java Cloud Service vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.