Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 18.0% mindshare in PSP, compared to Oracle’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 321 Microsoft Azure reviews

19,049 Views
11,239 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews

381 Views
278 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service are key competitors in the cloud platform space. Microsoft Azure has an edge in pricing and support while Oracle Java Cloud Service offers more advanced features that justify its higher cost in certain scenarios.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers AI capabilities, data analytics, and a comprehensive network infrastructure, making it suitable for a wide range of applications. Oracle Java Cloud Service specializes in Java applications with excellent scalability and seamless Oracle database integration, ideal for Java-centric environments.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its Java application support and improve integration with Oracle databases. Its AI features may benefit from better customizability. Oracle Java Cloud Service might focus on expanding its support beyond Java and improving pricing flexibility. Enhanced AI and analytics offerings could also broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure simplifies deployment with templates and strong integration with existing systems. It provides robust technical support. Oracle Java Cloud Service, tailored for Java environments, benefits from Oracle's technical expertise, offering a smooth setup process. While Azure's broader support aids initial setups, Oracle excels in Java-specific configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure provides a competitive pricing model with flexible options, offering strong ROI due to scalability and low initial costs. Oracle Java Cloud Service's higher initial investment can yield substantial long-term returns in Java-focused settings. Azure often appears more cost-effective upfront, whereas Oracle offers greater value over the long term in specialized Java environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

321

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 18.0%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure	18.0%
Oracle Java Cloud Service	0.4%
Other	81.6%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Adam Elguennioui

SAP Consultant at SA&BC

Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users

The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution does a lot of coding and customization, and can go live quickly."

"I like a lot of features. For example, the Windows virtual solution has helped in such a way that our client-based application was converted into a web-based version through the use of the Windows Virtual Desktop."

"Microsoft Azure is scalable."

"Microsoft Azure has thousands of services and products."

"Virtual machine services, in SaaS services, M365, and Data Lake are all popular with our clients."

"It is a stable solution because it depends on the workload you expect. Based on that data, you can configure how many users it can handle."

"The performance is good."

"The solution is very simple to use. It has a lot of great practical applications we really appreciate."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"Backing up and recovery for my domain is very easy and fast. In addition, applying patches and undoing applied patches is effective and easy to do."

"It is pretty easy to use."

"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."

"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."

"Cloud has provided less maintenance."

"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."

"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."

"The solution's technical support is good."

More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros

Cons

"The design of the platform is not so easy to navigate. It's not very user-friendly."

"The solution could use mutual segmentation for servers. It would be ideal if you could constitute something like five or 15 groups among the groups of different computers inside Azure."

"The price should be lower."

"Potential improvements to the price calculator tool"

"The customer support can become pricey at times if you don't have proper plans."

"The pricing criteria can be improved with broken-down terms that can be understood easily."

"They should create integrations with more platforms."

"One key area for improvement is the Azure load balancer. Currently, it only supports virtual machines (VMs) running in the same virtual network (vNet) on the backend. They should definitely support machines or IPs running on-premises (prem) or in other Azure VNets. GCP and AWS already support that. So, Azure Load Balancer should support that as well"

More Microsoft Azure cons

"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."

"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."

"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."

"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Microsoft Azure depends on the services that are used and there can be a discount at a corporate level from Microsoft."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Microsoft Azure is a cost-effective solution where you use it as per your requirement and pay for it."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It's a pay-as-you-go subscription."

"The current pricing is on a pay-as-you-go subscription."

"We are on a monthly subscription for Microsoft Azure and the cost is more expensive than some of the competitors, such as Amazon AWS. They should be more competitive with other solutions."

"It is not cheap. Its price could be a little bit less."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."

"It is somewhat expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	140
Midsize Enterprise	53
Large Enterprise	148

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?

I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 10% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 37% of the time

Oracle Application Container Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 35% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 27% of the time

More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

September 2025

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service

September 2025

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?

Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.

What benefits should users expect from Azure?

Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

September 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.