Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Java Cloud Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Oracle is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 18.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Oracle’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 316 Microsoft Azure reviews

20,523 Views
12,314 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Read 16 Oracle Java Cloud Service reviews

342 Views
239 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Oracle Java Cloud Service are key competitors in the cloud platform space. Microsoft Azure has an edge in pricing and support while Oracle Java Cloud Service offers more advanced features that justify its higher cost in certain scenarios.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers AI capabilities, data analytics, and a comprehensive network infrastructure, making it suitable for a wide range of applications. Oracle Java Cloud Service specializes in Java applications with excellent scalability and seamless Oracle database integration, ideal for Java-centric environments.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its Java application support and improve integration with Oracle databases. Its AI features may benefit from better customizability. Oracle Java Cloud Service might focus on expanding its support beyond Java and improving pricing flexibility. Enhanced AI and analytics offerings could also broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure simplifies deployment with templates and strong integration with existing systems. It provides robust technical support. Oracle Java Cloud Service, tailored for Java environments, benefits from Oracle's technical expertise, offering a smooth setup process. While Azure's broader support aids initial setups, Oracle excels in Java-specific configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure provides a competitive pricing model with flexible options, offering strong ROI due to scalability and low initial costs. Oracle Java Cloud Service's higher initial investment can yield substantial long-term returns in Java-focused settings. Azure often appears more cost-effective upfront, whereas Oracle offers greater value over the long term in specialized Java environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

316

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Oracle Java Cloud Service

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 18.8%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Java Cloud Service is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Nicolas Chabrier

Cloud Strategy B2B leader at Sunrise UPC

Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration

The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.

Read full review

Adam Elguennioui

SAP Consultant at SA&BC

Offers flexibility and better accessibility to users

The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution. When working with a cloud tool, it's never 100 percent secure and it is always something to take into account. I would like to be more comfortable working with it and feeling safer. In the future, the tool can be made faster. In the future, I would like to see maybe some AI features in the tool to help automate stuff. You need to be able to create your own models to help create some automated actions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides a high level of availability and 99% uptime."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is its ease of use."

"The platform's user-friendliness eliminates the need for lengthy training periods, enabling swift navigation for new users."

"We use the solution to manage and secure my users' email for the Active Directory."

"The most valuable features I have found to be the auto-scaling feature and the interface."

"The application services are the most valuable in Microsoft Azure. I'm not using them directly but I am using the function and the web applications. I don't need to pay a lot for the maintenance. I do not need to have a DevOps employee."

"Microsoft offers free courses and an exam on their products. Many of my colleagues who use Microsoft Azure take advantage of those free courses to help them learn about the solution in depth."

"The product makes it easy to spin up new environments and develop new technologies."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"The automated features of auto-purging in 12c helps clear disk space on a routine basis."

"The ability to manage security and access the server from any location with complete security using SSH is perfect for performing crucial tasks, even while travelling."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"One key feature is getting to choose the Virtual Machine configurations while setting up the server, which is an automated process."

"The auto-backup, incremental backup and restoration features can be invaluable for management."

"It is pretty easy to use."

"Cloud has provided less maintenance."

"Self-provisioning, easy to choose from WebLogic 11g to 12c."

More Oracle Java Cloud Service pros

Cons

"The price could be improved as well as the interface speed, and technical support."

"The solution is less mature than AWS."

"If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement."

"When we work with Microsoft Azure we deploy it in a hybrid system. We do many operations with the open stack and I used it for APIs connected to Microsoft Azure. The reduction is because those APIs and our tools that are required to connect are not for the Microsft Azure solution. It has a bit of complexity, nothing to do with Microsoft Azure as a CSP."

"The subscription licensing is very complex and we would like to have it simplified."

"While integrating services from different vendors, the perceived costs are high, with occasional confusion about specific charges, especially in data transfer scenarios between regions."

"Azure calculator could be improved, there are issues with login synchronization."

"The pricing can be reduced."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"The security part of the tool is not so strong, making it an area I would like to see improved in the solution."

"The product is satisfactory but we need more training on managing the machine itself. For example, how do we add more storage, how do we extend a specific portion? I would like to see videos illustrating some of the technical tasks that we often need to do."

"Needs better integration with other Oracle/non-Oracle products."

"There are issues with the application's development, including small glitches and errors."

"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers need to purchase additional services because of the complexity of it."

"The pricing is better than AWS."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We're paying in dollars, and it's very expensive for us because of the exchange rates."

"The licensing fees depend on the number of users that we have."

"Its costing can be improved. Its licensing is monthly. In addition to the standard license fee, there is a transactional cost."

"It is similar to AWS, where it is on-demand and is billed monthly."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"It is somewhat expensive."

"Oracle is a little more expensive right now, but not much compared to SAP. Oracle's prices are very much dependent on the scale of the project and how many users are there."

"Oracle Java Cloud Service is an expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Java Cloud Service?

The solution's technical support is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Java Cloud Service?

I did a comparative study on the pricing between Oracle and SAP S/4HANA, but it was related to databases and in the areas associated with the clouds. I can tell that Oracle is a little more expensi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Java Cloud Service?

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 12% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Oracle Application Container Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 36% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 34% of the time

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs Oracle Java Cloud Service

Compared 30% of the time

More Oracle Java Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

July 2025

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Java Cloud Service

July 2025

Download Oracle Java Cloud Service product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?

Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.

What benefits should users expect from Azure?

Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

Oracle Java Cloud Service is a complete platform and infrastructure cloud solution for building, deploying, and managing Java EE applications. Use Oracle Java Cloud Service to rapidly provision an application environment with Oracle WebLogic Server as the application container, Oracle Coherence as a caching and data grid tier, and Oracle Traffic Director as the software load balancer—all on top of infrastructure provided by Oracle Compute Cloud Service.

For more information on Oracle Java Cloud Service, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Avaya, ADNOC Distribution, DocuSign, Zamil Industrial Investment Company

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Oracle Java Cloud Service report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.