Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Oracle and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Oracle is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Oracle holds a 0.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Read 1 Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service review

471 Views
471 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 112 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

9,185 Views
5,327 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service are network monitoring products. PRTG Network Monitor is preferred due to its affordable pricing and effective customer service, while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service offers more feature-rich capabilities.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides real-time monitoring, easy-to-use dashboards, and customizable alerts. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service offers advanced analytics, deep integration with Oracle suite, and robust cloud monitoring capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward deployment process and proactive customer service. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service presents a more complex deployment due to enterprise-grade integration options, with comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor is cost-effective with a competitive setup cost and clear ROI path. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service involves a higher setup cost, justified by extensive features and potential long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Infrastructure Monit...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

41st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 3.9%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PRTG Network Monitor	3.9%
Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service	0.4%
Other	95.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Saktid Devi Jeyakaran

Associate Cloud Engineer at Ebizoncloud LLC

Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database

It's primarily for CPU utilization and resource monitoring. Vulnerability scanning falls under OCI Cloud Guard, so it's related to security concerns. Some people might prefer using a third-party tool for more enhanced features. However, I think Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service could be improved to reduce the need for third-party connectivity. So overall, third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service. OCI needs more research and development to understand why clients choose third-party tools like Splunk or QRadar over internal monitoring solutions. There must be some areas where third-party tools are better. OCI could analyze this and improve its service.

Read full review

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility

The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."

"I really love the activity library. It gives the flexibility to discover data and metrics about my interface and data server."

"Technical support is helpful."

"There was only one feature I liked about PRTG Network Monitor a lot, and that was bandwidth monitoring, though, in the newer versions of the tool, that feature is now a bit lacking. Pricing for PRTG Network Monitor is also not as expensive. It's a good tool, even for beginners."

"I would boldly say that this is the most scalable network monitoring tool that I know of"

"The network visualization helps us to drill down deeper."

"Ability to create a dashboard inside software monitoring."

"It is a central solution in terms of how to actually use it. It has a very easy dashboard. Everything is concise. We are able to create custom sensors. For different parts of the business, we have many products across many environments, and it works for everything."

"I can create my own program sensor. This means I can add extra monitoring capabilities into the already fundamentally strong foundation."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."

"PRTG Network Monitor needs to enhance network performance monitoring. Moving towards observability, similar to what Datadog offers, could be beneficial."

"There seems to be a big jump from the basic scan to the really thorough scan. There is a big jump in the quantity of sensors it uses for certain things. One minute you might get ten and then the next you get 200. There seems to be a big jump between the two at times."

"The operations dashboard is only available in PRTG's enterprise version, but I wish it could be accessed in the standard licensing. It would also be nice if PRTG had templates for dashboard monitoring, software monitoring, etc. It can help me set up a dashboard because now we don't have a template from PRTG, so we need to create one from scratch."

"We're using more cloud services now. It would be useful to be able to get information back from these cloud services in detail, and display any issues within PRTG for the rest of our systems."

"Maybe in the future there will be room for improvement, but currently, there is nothing pressing that I can think of"

"Their penetration within the market could be much better. If their pricing was lower, even though it's reasonable now, it might help them achieve this."

"I would like to see them take their graphing tools and convert them into a collector so that we can point telemetry to them"

"Sometimes, our PRTG Network Monitor system crashes and a lot of sensors go down."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis."

"We pay for PRTG Network Monitor annually. The price is approximately 10,000 rupees annually."

"The price is pretty comparable."

"It's an annual license that is based on the number of endpoints that we're tracking and using."

"The pricing is comparable."

"We have unlimited devices and sensors, and it is a bit pricey, but we do have unlimited sensors. With all things considered the price is fine, related to the solution itself. PRTG Network Monitor is good value for money."

"In my company now, we are using the free version."

"Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do."

"We bought a license for 4000 sensors."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

For monitoring specifically, it's not that expensive. The licensing is yearly basis. However, there are monthly licensing options available as well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 20% of the time

Zabbix vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 19% of the time

Datadog vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 18% of the time

Nagios Core vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 16% of the time

Nagios XI vs Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service

Compared 15% of the time

More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Competitors

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

January 2026

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Overview

Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is a software-as-a-service solution that monitors the status and health of your entire IT infrastructure - on-premises or on the cloud - from a single platform. Proactive monitoring across all your infrastructure tiers enables you to be alerted on issues, troubleshoot and resolve these before they impact end users.

Oracle

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

COMPOSERS AND AUTHORS SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.