We performed a comparison between Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and SAP S/4HANA Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Built-in business intelligence has real-time reporting features that are quite handy."
"The scalability is very good."
"What's most valuable in Oracle ERP Cloud is that it's one of the largest ERPs available in the market and it has a lot of customization features. It also has a lot of flexibility and integration options that work with other applications. Many of the customers also migrate to the cloud, so Oracle ERP Cloud is a preferred solution."
"It fosters adoption of a shared services center model."
"Oracle ERP Cloud is a well-established and well-known product that is cost-effective for the customer."
"Oracle ERP Cloud is a stable solution."
"The user interface is the best feature."
"It provides our management a real-time view of operations."
"We like the web portal or interface, which is great. The user experience is much better than the current traditional SAP landscape."
"Finance aspects of it and transportation management, asset management, and inventory management are valuable."
"With the newer update, there are more funnels as well as ample opportunity to customize the solution. With the SAP Optimizer, companies are using about five to ten percent of the product as-is while the other ninety to ninety five percent is customized to automate and standardize processes."
"The solution is stable."
"I like S/4HANA's automated features, readymade processes, and user interface. It supports various processes required by large international companies, like logistics, procurement, payments, sales, etc. All of these features were available in previous SAP solutions, but HANA has an updated user interface and improved integration with other systems. The readymade processes make HANA a good option if you're adopting a greenfield approach."
"The most valuable aspect of SAP S/4HANA Cloud is its ease of deployment and the reduced hassles of infrastructure support."
"I have found the financial and production modules to be the most valuable features."
"The tool selection is really robust and scalable for multiple scenarios."
"It should be built with less complexity and more ability for clients to add screens."
"The solution's new analytics information, dashboard, and flexibility of reporting could be improved."
"Localization of functionality for Europe and Latin American countries legal and fiscal requirements, reporting, and integration with tax authorities."
"The solution should implement improvements with AI technology. Specifically, in the realm of ERP tools, this can be particularly beneficial, not only for cloud-based systems but for all types of tools. Additionally, a highly desirable feature is the ability to work offline."
"The database is outdated and quite rigid."
"The main thing Cloud ERP could improve is usability. However, it's not just an issue with Oracle. Most ERP solutions are not very user-friendly, so I think that could be the key improvement."
"The expenses mobile app calculates different mileages than the URL version."
"The initial setup can be somewhat complex."
"When it comes to the SAP PM material's module, it would be nice to see the inclusion of predictive analytics."
"The solution’s reporting could be improved."
"Difficult to install and difficult to test. Testing needs to be improved. Scalability of this solution also needs improvement."
"I'd like to share my experience during the migration from SAP ERP to SAP S/4HANA in the cloud. My primary challenge in this migration was the requirement to open a ticket for every request during the project phase, not during operational or post go-live phases. Despite this, I must acknowledge that overall, SAP has proven to be very reliable. To clarify the issue, after migrating to SAP S/4HANA, I opted to host my SAP solution on the private cloud by converting the license to SAP Cloud. The drawback I encountered during the project phase was the insistence on opening a ticket or service request for any issue or query I had within the project's activities. Looking ahead, I hope that SAP streamlines and simplifies this process for future customers, making it more user-friendly and efficient than my experience."
"Public cloud is single-tenant so there are limitations on what can be customized."
"The implementation time for S/4HANA Cloud could be reduced."
"I need more options for enhancing the system, especially compared to the features available in the on-premise version."
"Analytics could be improved."
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP is ranked 2nd in Cloud ERP with 34 reviews while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is ranked 3rd in Cloud ERP with 41 reviews. Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP writes "Everything can be found in one place and it is all embedded in a single system". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA Cloud writes "A valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance their overall performance and competitiveness in the digital era". Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP S/4HANA, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas SAP S/4HANA Cloud is most compared with SAP Business ByDesign, SAP Business One, IFS Cloud Platform, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA. See our Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA Cloud report.
See our list of best Cloud ERP vendors.
We monitor all Cloud ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
