Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Silk Central vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

OpenText and Zeenyx are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. OpenText is ranked #20, while Zeenyx is ranked #13 with an average rating of 10.0. OpenText holds a 1.6% mindshare in TMT, compared to Zeenyx’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zeenyx users who would recommend it.
OpenText Silk Central
Read 9 OpenText Silk Central reviews
  • 286 Views
  • 286 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Read 13 Zeenyx AscentialTest reviews
  • 548 Views
  • 110 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Zeenyx AscentialTest and OpenText Silk Central compete in the test management tools category. OpenText Silk Central seems to have the upper hand due to its robust features, although some users feel its higher cost is justified.

Features: Zeenyx AscentialTest offers automated testing capabilities, integration options, and a user-friendly interface. OpenText Silk Central provides extensive test management, advanced reporting features, and a comprehensive suite of tools, making it ideal for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Zeenyx AscentialTest needs better documentation, improved reporting functionality, and enhancements to user experience. OpenText Silk Central requires a more gradual learning curve, better integration with third-party tools, and increased flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zeenyx AscentialTest is easy to deploy and has responsive customer support. OpenText Silk Central has mixed reviews on deployment ease due to complexity, but its customer service is knowledgeable and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Zeenyx AscentialTest is cost-effective and offers quick ROI. OpenText Silk Central, while more expensive, provides a good return on investment due to its extensive features. Zeenyx offers better initial value, but OpenText’s extensive functionality justifies its higher price for larger enterprises.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Central vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Silk Central vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Central
Ranking in Test Management Tools
20th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Test Design Automation (4th)
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
13th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (18th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zeenyx AscentialTest is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

it_user685080 - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions
We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool.
Read full review
Tobias Roth - PeerSpot reviewer
Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration
The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."
"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."
"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."
"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."
 

Cons

"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."
"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."
"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."
"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."
"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Healthcare Company
21%
Government
15%
University
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?
AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?
While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?
We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Silk Central Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Silk Central
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Silk Central Competitors
SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Zeenyx AscentialTest
Compared 100% of the time
More Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
August 2025
OpenText Silk Central reportDownload OpenText Silk Central product report
Buyer's Guide
Zeenyx AscentialTest
July 2025
Zeenyx AscentialTest reportDownload Zeenyx AscentialTest product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
AscentialTest
 

Overview

Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
OpenText
AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
Zeenyx
 

Sample Customers

AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Silk Central vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
July 2025
Free Report: OpenText Silk Central vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Central vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText Silk Central vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.