We performed a comparison between OpenText Silk Central and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools."The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."
"With one click, it will scan all the elements on the screen, so that the user can select the required elements for automation tests."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"Tricentis Tosca is a really cool tool that you don't have to be technical to use it. Additionally, the solution is easy to use. The modules, libraries, and reusable are in an efficient way to update all the tests. I find it spot on with that. We also started using the design which we switched from Excel. The design was superior to Excel."
"Object Identification Wizard."
"This tool is very easy to use and I think that anyone can come in, having no experience with it, and within four to six months be comfortable with it."
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."
"Parallel execution is not yet implemented for Tosca. This means you can't execute the same test case on multiple machines remotely."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
"The tool lags in client-based applications. We have also encountered issues with the features in integrations."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
Earn 20 points
OpenText Silk Central is ranked 21st in Test Management Tools while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Regression Testing Tools with 96 reviews. OpenText Silk Central is rated 7.8, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Silk Central writes "We have many possibilities to customize the utilization and we can also work easily at database level for custom reporting and to manage additional information and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". OpenText Silk Central is most compared with OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Zephyr Enterprise, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
