Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, Perforce and others in Performance Testing Tools.
If I need to rate support from one to ten, I would say it is a nine.
The technical support is really excellent.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
We look at the scalability because we are using the SaaS model now.
I see it is stable, though there are some glitches or latency sometimes.
I find that AI functionality in OpenText LoadRunner Professional should be improved and more accessible.
Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
The price is expensive.
The most valuable feature of OpenText LoadRunner Professional is the analysis part that is really good, along with the support for multiple protocols.
The scripting language is quite comfortable for us since we are working with C and C++.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| Apache JMeter | 12.8% |
| Tricentis NeoLoad | 10.0% |
| Other | 65.1% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 1.2% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 14.2% |
| BrowserStack | 8.1% |
| Other | 76.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering, known as LoadRunner Professional, stands out with its powerful scripting tool, flexible capabilities, and extensive analytics, supporting numerous concurrent users for impactful load testing.
This performance engineering tool offers integration across systems and strong community support, paired with user-friendly interfaces. It excels in features like multi-protocol support, auto-correlation, and detailed reporting. However, improvements are needed in user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness, as scripting remains complex and pricing is a hurdle. Enhancing mobile and SPA testing capabilities, modern protocol support, and compatibility with non-Windows platforms would greatly benefit users while expanding monitoring and technical support responsiveness.
What are the key features of OpenText LoadRunner Professional?LoadRunner Professional is employed for performance and load testing across sectors such as banking, hospitality, and telecommunications. Users simulate business transactions and test applications under different user loads, focusing on API testing, web applications, and benchmarking to achieve optimal performance in complex scenarios.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
