Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Testuff comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center
Ranking in Test Management Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
201
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (5th)
Testuff
Ranking in Test Management Tools
32nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 12.3%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testuff is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

VR
Jun 17, 2024
Manages test cases effectively and consolidates manual automation and performance features into a single platform, allowing users to access analysis results
The reporting feature could be improved. It would be better if they simplified some things. It requires writing queries in the setup. If we could click a button and instantly get analytics and everything in one shot, it would be easier to use. It needs improvement in the reporting process. While graphical representations and other features exist, it requires custom code to be written. If it could be simplified with a single button to generate reports, like in TestLab, it would be easier. A new module specifically for reporting would be helpful. Instead of integrating it into TestLab, it should be a separate module, making it easier for users.
Use Testuff?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"HPE has one of the most rigid, inflexible, and super expensive license models."
"It allows us to keep our costs low. I do not want to pay beyond a certain point for this solution."
"Quality Center is pricey, but cheaper is not always less expensive."
"The enterprise pricing and licensing are reasonable."
"It all comes down to how many people are going to access the tool. When teams go above 20, I think ALM is a better tool to use from a collaboration and streamlining perspective."
"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is very expensive. The price is approximately £2,000 per person, they are too expensive to corner the market."
"It is an expensive tool. I think one needs to pay 10,000 USD towards the perpetual licensing model."
"Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
59%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Has anyone tried integrating HP ALM and JIRA ?
HP ALM and Jira can be easily integrated with the aid of a third-party Integration Solution. To help you select the right integration approach and tool, you should first define your integration req...
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?
The solution's pricing makes it more challenging for companies to buy it. Only major companies that can afford it use OpenText ALM. Jira is free for the first ten users, which makes it more attract...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)
Leica Microsystems, SRA International, TDR, Core Brands, Blackboard, Repete, Roblox
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: August 2024.
805,335 professionals have used our research since 2012.