OpenLegacy vs webMethods.io comparison

OpenLegacy and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. OpenLegacy is ranked #37, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. OpenLegacy holds a 0.8% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenLegacy users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

OpenLegacy

Read 5 OpenLegacy reviews

649 Views
545 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,762 Views
2,541 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenLegacy

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenLegacy and webMethods.io are enterprise-focused integration solutions, with webMethods.io often seen as having superior technological capabilities, offering advanced features that many organizations find beneficial despite its potentially higher cost.

Features: OpenLegacy enables effective modernization with rapid API development, seamless integration with mainframes, and a user-friendly API development environment. webMethods.io offers comprehensive integration features, cloud-based capabilities, and extensive connector support, making it versatile for various integration needs.

Room for Improvement: OpenLegacy could enhance its cloud integration capabilities, improve scalability in complex enterprise environments, and expand its connector library. webMethods.io could streamline its deployment process, reduce complexity in its user interface, and refine its pricing model for better competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenLegacy offers a straightforward deployment process, especially suited for legacy systems, supported by dedicated customer assistance. webMethods.io provides a flexible hybrid deployment model, combining cloud and on-premise options, alongside robust global customer support, offering high versatility across environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenLegacy generally provides lower setup costs with quick ROI for organizations focusing on legacy integration. webMethods.io might involve higher initial costs but delivers ROI through its extensive feature set and adaptability, appealing to enterprises with broader integration demands.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,425 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenLegacy

Ranking in API Management

37th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (65th)

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (8th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of OpenLegacy is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	2.5%
OpenLegacy	0.8%
Other	96.7%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1042905

VP, Chief Enterprise Integration Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The biggest advantage is how simple the technology was.

I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be. OpenLegacy handles the bread-and-butter TP monitoring stuff, but I am working for one of the six banks in the United States still using the Hogan mainframe, which has a slightly proprietary mechanism. But OpenLegacy currently doesn't have a connector for Hogan. So it would help if they could build one. That would appeal to financial institutions that still use Hogan, like US Bank, Wells Fargo, KeyBank, and Vanguard.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Opens the door to connect modern web products to an old legacy system."

"OpenLegacy provides a way to go from the outside world to the legacy mainframe, to move the old standard application to a REST API application. New digital services can be created in a few clicks and this can be done easily by COBOL programmers."

"It is possible to solve larger legacy API issues on an enterprise level with this product."

"Using mainframe programs (not screens), the OpenLegacy services do not require any changes by the mainframe programmers, thus reducing development cycles."

"Using OpenLegacy, the exposure of services is far easier and quicker. In many cases, exposure of services requires just a few clicks and takes only minutes. In very complex cases, it still only takes half a day. Without OpenLegacy, it would take us several months to create the same services."

"It is possible to connect a service to a mainframe program or back transaction in a matter of minutes or hours at the most."

"OpenLegacy produces a war file which includes everything you need to deploy a Tomcat server."

"The biggest advantage of OpenLegacy was how simple the technology was. We were able to build out the OpenLegacy parts very quickly. We put together a couple hundred APIs in six months."

"I like the solution's policies, transformation, mediation, and routing features."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."

"The ease of mapping... is the single largest feature. It gives us the ability to craft anything. A lot of single-purpose technologies, like Mirth, are good for healthcare messages, but we use webMethods not only for healthcare messages but for other business-related purposes, like integrations to Salesforce or integrations to Office 365. It's multi-purpose nature is very strong."

"What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."

"It is a very stable product."

"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."

"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

"Debugging and logging for programmers could be better."

"I would like to see SSL out-of-the-box. OpenLegacy certainly does SSL, but it was not the default for our use case. We are currently working with OpenLegacy to cross the SSL bridge and suspect that most users will want to do the same."

"We would also be more than happy if the product had the option to work in the opposite direction – the ability to consume REST/SOW services in the outer world from the mainframe."

"Customer support for the product is slow and not very good. It makes using the product difficult if you need help quickly."

"I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be."

"webMethods.io lacks advanced monitoring and analytics capabilities, so my customers need to use something additional."

"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."

"There are things that could be improved with the webMethods API gateway. One thing is that it's too attached to the integration service and we'd like it to be a little bit more independent. We would like for them to separate operations so that it doesn't rely on the bulky integration server and so that it can be used everywhere."

"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"It is worth the cost."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft API Manager vs OpenLegacy

Compared 14% of the time

Pipedream vs OpenLegacy

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs OpenLegacy

Compared 13% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs OpenLegacy

Compared 11% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenLegacy

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenLegacy Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 6% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy

December 2025

Download OpenLegacy product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

December 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

OpenLegacy helps organizations quickly launch innovative digital services by extending their core back-end systems to the web, mobile and cloud in days or weeks versus months. Our microservice-enabled API integration and management software quickly reduces project backlog by automating and accelerating microservices and API creation, deployment, testing and management from core applications, mainframes and databases. Together, business and IT teams can quickly, easily and securely meet consumer, partner or employee demands for digital services without modernizing or replacing core systems, and without special programming skills or invasive changes to existing systems and architectures. OpenLegacy is designed for ongoing management of microservices APIs and is based on open standards, so our software plays nice with your current technology stack and supports agile, DevOps and continuous development. Learn why leading companies choose OpenLegacy at www.openlegacy.com.

OpenLegacy

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Many of openLegacy's global customers are among the Global 100 companies. Review case studies in these industries: Agriculture, Airport Authority, Automotive, Auto, Finance, Insurance, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Retailwww.openlegacy.com/case-studie...

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenLegacy vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.