OpenIAM Identity Governance vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

The compared OpenIAM and Ping Identity solutions aren't in the same category. OpenIAM is ranked #15 in UP , and holds a 2.0% mindshare in the category. Ping Identity is ranked #7 in AS , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenIAM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

OpenIAM Identity Governance

Read 1 OpenIAM Identity Governance review

935 Views
252 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

6,348 Views
2,095 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenIAM Identity Governance

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenIAM Identity Governance and Ping Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software.

To learn more, read our detailed User Provisioning Software Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenIAM Identity Governance

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (15th), Identity Management (IM) (26th)

Ping Identity Platform

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (4th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenIAM Identity Governance is designed for User Provisioning Software and holds a mindshare of 2.0%, up 1.1% compared to last year.
Ping Identity Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Authentication Systems, holds 3.7% mindshare, up 3.5% since last year.

User Provisioning Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenIAM Identity Governance	2.0%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud	22.5%
One Identity Manager	11.2%
Other	64.3%

User Provisioning Software

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	3.7%
Microsoft Entra ID	7.8%
Okta Platform	5.0%
Other	83.5%

Authentication Systems

Q&A Highlights

it_user867039

Works with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 16, 2018

OpenIAM vs Ping identity

Agree With Arnold Felderbaum's comment. Asking for the "battlecard" (not familiar with that term, but suspect you are asking about bakeoff results) is not going to help you, unless the respondant's business requirements are an exact match with your organization.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Sunil Mishra

Lead Consultant at a security firm with 51-200 employees

Manages user identities and application access in a centralized way from a single console/portal

OpenIAM provides an Identity and Access Management platform which includes identity and access management (i.e., SSO, Multi-factor Authentication, password synchronization, and RBAC). Below are the features : Lower Cost of Implementation & Total Cost of Ownership: * OpenIAM uses tools, such as Groovy script to implement business rules, Grails to create new UI functionality, Activiti for workflow, PowerShell, etc. It also support web services. So it is important to find skilled technical resources readily and at reasonable cost in comparison to the large vendors, which use proprietary tools for developing custom connector or product customization as per business requirement. * OpenIAM is also based on Open Source technologies (i.e., JBoss, Apache, MySQL, CentOS), so Total Cost of Ownership is very low in comparison to other IAM products. * Compliance with standards simplifies integration. * Subscription-based license model. Ease of Use: OpenIAM offers a single unified Admin console and a single unified self-service portal for customers to use and manage the IAM suite (i.e. Identity Management, Access Management, and Multi-Factor Authentication). Modern Architecture: * Built from the ground up, not through acquisitions and proprietary technology. * SOA architecture * Cloud-enabled Enterprise Grade Product: Even though OpenIAM is based on Open Source technologies, it is: * Built on industry standards * Simplified integration * Uses established industry frameworks

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer support is very good and available in almost all time zones."

"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."

"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"Ping Identity Platform can provide a solution for both workforce identity and access management and also for consumer identity and access management, which is CIAM."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"We use the product to run different reports."

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"OpenIAM should improve the product/API documentation on portal which gives more flexibility to developers for product customization and connector development."

"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"It has a long way to go until it is a cloud-based solution."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"If the solution is going to compete with Microsoft, they need to offer more unique functionality to keep their current user base."

"Ping Identity Platform must improve its UI since its management console is complicated."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The product is costly."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Provisioning Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

it_user867039

Works with 5,001-10,000 employees

May 16, 2018

OpenIAM vs Ping identity

2 out of 6 answers

it_user834495

Enterprise Architect at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 15, 2018

There is a huge difference in between SSO and IAM. Don't confuse the 2 or you will be very disappointed. PING is SSO and partners with IAM providers while OpenIAM is a Identity Management System that provides SSO capabilities within its software. Single Signon is still managed by individual applications and AD. Our comparison was Okta and PING, but same concept.

Read full answer

it_user455748

Works at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

May 15, 2018

Agreed. What are the business requirements?

Read full answer

See all 6 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

15%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about PingFederate?

PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingFederate?

It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingFederate?

We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs OpenIAM Identity Governance

Compared 14% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenIAM Identity Governance

Compared 11% of the time

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs OpenIAM Identity Governance

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Identity Manager vs OpenIAM Identity Governance

Compared 10% of the time

Soffid vs OpenIAM Identity Governance

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenIAM Identity Governance Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

March 2026

Download OpenIAM Identity Governance product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

OpenIAM, OpenIAM IGA

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

The modern enterprise consists of both on-premise and cloud-based solutions often being utilized by users who are often geographically distributed. These users may also be a mix of employees, contractors, customers, vendors and so forth. OpenIAM Identity Governance (IGA) simplifies the way in which organizations manage identities across this complex landscape.

OpenIAM

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

Citicorp, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, Marsh and McLennan, SBC Warburg, GE Electric Insurance, Tata Communications, NettBuss, AMSCAN, Time Warner, MultiPlan, Stater Bros., County of Orange - California, TUI Hotels, NV Energy, EMCOR Group, Previred

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, One Identity, Omada and others in User Provisioning Software. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.