NGINX Ingress Controller vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] comparison

F5 and Nutanix are both solutions in the Container Management category. Additionally, 100% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

NGINX Ingress Controller

Read 1 NGINX Ingress Controller review

653 Views
653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Read 14 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

NGINX Ingress Controller

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 1, 2025

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] and NGINX Ingress Controller are competing solutions in the Kubernetes ecosystem. NGINX Ingress Controller is often seen as superior due to its robust features which users see as justifying the cost.

Features: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE offers seamless Kubernetes infrastructure management, automated scaling, and enhanced security. NGINX Ingress Controller provides advanced load balancing, traffic routing, and SSL termination.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is recognized for its simpler deployment within Nutanix environments and reliable support. NGINX Ingress Controller offers extensive online resources and community support facilitating easier troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE's setup costs are often seen as competitive offering a sensible return on investment by reducing operational complexities. NGINX Ingress Controller, although potentially higher in initial cost, is valued for its high return through traffic optimization and reliability, leading to better long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,955 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NGINX Ingress Controller

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (17th)

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine N...

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Sukkarin Ruensukont

Information Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reliability has supported AI gateway routing and currently secures LLM traffic with flexible policies

In my opinion, NGINX Ingress Controller can make better improvements for ingress control, and I think they are already the leader in the Ingress and Gateway API. The Gateway API has the capability to separate the gateway responsible for the FQDN and certificate management. They separate this part within the gateway, and another part is the HTTP route which will load balance to the backend service. F5 has this kind of deployment for many years before the announcement of the Gateway API itself. Currently, there is no suggestion about complexities or functions that can simplify my life with NGINX Ingress Controller.

Read full review

reviewer2741271

Nutanix Administrator at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has provided seamless upgrade experiences and robust technical support

I have heard there are many features added in NKP that are not available in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, such as load balancer features. The unified control plane feature is not being used in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE. We are currently using a third-party tool for load balancing, but going forward, NKP will include load balancer, ingress, and egress features, making infrastructure management much easier. There is no auto-scaling feature in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE; however, NKP offers it. In NKE, we created additional worker nodes and increased CPU and RAM capacity, but it required manual intervention. Concerning policy-driven governance in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, we have the ability to implement RBAC at the cluster level, which helps maintain security by not granting full admin privileges to every end user, thus restricting access effectively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my experience, I think the main benefit NGINX Ingress Controller provides to the end user is the reliability of NGINX Ingress Controller itself."

"Nutanix is very stable and reliable, based on my experience with many customers, including large banks and telcos."

"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"Karbon is embedded in the hypervisor, there are no deployment costs and the administration is via Prism Central."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"The technical support is excellent."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] pros

Cons

"Most customers are satisfied with the reverse proxy capability, but the main issue is that the Ingress NGINX, the one that is most widely used, will be deprecated this month."

"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."

"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"We need a backup of production clusters."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX Ingress Controller?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. The pricing was expensive at first, but throughout the journey, it became feasible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NGINX Ingress Controller?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NGINX Ingress Controller?

I am currently working with NGINX Ingress Controller but in a different perspective than before. We haven't used App Protect anymore, but as an implementer, we use it as a front end for an AI gatew...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

In terms of features, I cannot comment technically, but the real value is the consolidated out-of-the-box solution that Nutanix offers. Nutanix has built great branding and a lot of credibility and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I have experience with OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Nutanix, as we are one of the largest Nutanix resellers in the Middle East. We handle Kubernetes on the cloud as well, so we manage most of the Kub...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

I don't have a technical role, but we are a system integrator, so we sell solutions such as OpenShift and Kubernetes as part of the sales team. We are a reseller called eSky IT, and I serve as the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kubernetes vs NGINX Ingress Controller

Compared 28% of the time

Docker vs NGINX Ingress Controller

Compared 28% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs NGINX Ingress Controller

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs NGINX Ingress Controller

Compared 11% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs NGINX Ingress Controller

Compared 10% of the time

More NGINX Ingress Controller Competitors

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Google Kubernetes Engine vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

April 2026

Download NGINX Ingress Controller product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]

April 2026

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Karbon

Overview

NGINX Ingress Controller is a powerful tool that enables organizations to manage and route traffic to their Kubernetes clusters. It acts as a load balancer and reverses proxy for incoming traffic, allowing for efficient and secure communication between clients and backend services.

The most useful functionality of the solution is its ability to provide advanced traffic management features such as SSL termination, URL rewriting, and session persistence. By using NGINX Ingress Controller, organizations can improve the performance and reliability of their applications, reduce downtime, and enhance security.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] offers easy deployment, efficient resource management, and seamless integration with existing infrastructure, supporting virtualization and configurable RBAC.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] simplifies Kubernetes cluster deployment and management, offering robust features such as health checks and seamless upgrades. It integrates with existing systems, supports virtualization, and provides a unified console. Automatic load management and scalability contribute to its stability. Though migrating via VMware poses challenges and documentation updates are needed, potential enhancements include dynamic resource scaling, advanced backup options, and improved disaster recovery. NKE is ideal for microservices, container management, and application modernization, playing a vital role in DevOps settings.

What are the key features of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Easy Deployment: Simplifies cluster setup and management for quick ramp-up.
Resource Allocation: Efficiently allocates computing resources for optimized operations.
Seamless Upgrades: Handles updates without causing downtime.
Integration: Works with existing infrastructure, allowing virtualization support.
Console Management: Offers a single interface for robust management features.

What benefits should users look for in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL]?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides a reliable Kubernetes platform with reduced operational costs.
Scalability: Ensures stability and growth alongside increasing demands.
Support Features: Includes robust technical support for a seamless experience.
Efficiency: Enhances workload management in DevOps environments.
Configurable Options: Allows tailored RBAC and scalable virtualization benefits.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE [EOL] is deployed in industries focusing on microservices and application modernization, serving development to testing environments. It integrates with hardware and API tools, supporting DevOps workloads and infrastructure management. Primarily used on-premises, it supports large-scale application deployment leveraging network capabilities.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat, Kubernetes and others in Container Management. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.