Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Safetica ONE comparison

Netwrix and Safetica are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Netwrix is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.5, while Safetica is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.3. Additionally, 96% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Safetica users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Netwrix Endpoint Protector and Safetica ONE are prominent competitors in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) market. While Netwrix holds the advantage in cross-platform compatibility and features like Device Control, Safetica is favored for its budget-friendly options and intuitive setup.

Features: Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers Device Control, Content-Aware Protection, Enforced Encryption, and eDiscovery, making it suitable for hybrid environments with Windows, macOS, and Linux. Safetica ONE focuses on ease of use and compliance with a strong emphasis on data leak protection.

Room for Improvement: Netwrix could enhance its offering with network-level DLP and SaaS DLP and address policy granularity and uninstallation complexity. Safetica lacks Linux support and could improve integration with more firewall brands beyond FortiGate, alongside enhancing stability and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netwrix offers on-premises and cloud deployment options, though customer service experiences vary in follow-through. Safetica supports hybrid cloud scenarios but shares similar challenges with Netwrix in terms of support delays.

Pricing and ROI: Netwrix's pricing is reasonable, but its licensing changes have raised concerns. Safetica, despite being perceived as expensive, offers competitive pricing against peers and shows potential for substantial risk reduction and efficiency returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare

Featured Reviews

Spencer Malmad

Owner at Tech Exchange

It's easy to set up because you point the DNS to it, and it's working in under 15 minutes

Cloudflare is highly scalable. Cloudflare is a system with a web portal that the end users like me see. It's a console where we can adjust the DNS, caching, and security features all in that console. Cloudflare owns thousands of servers across the world that cache the data. It's a powerful solution. When clients sign up for Cloudflare, they're getting this monster content delivery network, security, and a web application firewall in one. It's all rolled into one, and it's massive. Unless you have your website hosted on a massive hosting provider, there's no way that you can deliver the amount of data that Cloudflare can provide to the end users. If you have static content, there's no way that you can ever match what Cloudflare can do. Obviously, there are competitors to Cloudflare that do the same, but I'm saying other types of solutions. Let's say you go with F5. Great, that's on-prem. That's in your colo. You can't deliver as much data to the internet as you can with a CDN. You don't have to spend $20,000 on a net scaler, F5, or whatever Cisco's selling now. You don't have to buy that. You pay them $50 a month or $150 a month. It's totally worth it because even in five years, you'll never get the performance value, not just the actual ROI. You have to consider how much throughput you can get with Cloudflare.

Read full review

Mohammad Amir Hossain

Head of IT Infrastructure at Samsung

Block USBs and manage ports effectively across multiple OS platforms

There is an important feature that needs to be added. In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled. If there is a feature that can notify in the master dashboard that an agent has been uninstalled, it would be very beneficial.

Read full review

Sonu Kumar

System Administrator at Logic Planet Inc

Comes with data leak protection features but technical support is too slow

We use the solution for endpoints. The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection. Safetica ONE's technical support is too slow. I have been using the product for six months. I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. I rate Safetica ONE's scalability a five out of…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The overall experience with Cloudflare is positive, with a rating of eight out of ten."

"Generally, I am satisfied with this product."

"I like Cloudflare's application gateway and DDoS protection."

"Smaller businesses have seen great ROI due to the low investment and strong performance."

"It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten...I rate the scalability a ten out of ten."

"Cloudflare offers CDN and DDoS protection. We have the front end, API, and database in how you structure applications."

"The simplicity of the overall dashboard makes it a great product for a user like me who has less understanding of the internet than a developer or other more technical people. It gives me peace of mind. I also love the easy customization of the Page Rules."

"Its ease of integration with Office 365 and the fact that it's a good product compared to what I had before"

More Cloudflare pros

"The role-based access features for the teams that administer it is good."

"Endpoint Protector's best features are its protection and user-friendliness."

"It is fantastic in terms of the granularity of the policies. It has many built-in policies, and we can add or create more policies as well. It is perfect, and it gives us more options. We have some users who go outside and then come inside. With EPP, we can even control those users who are outside. If they need to access the media that we are using right now, we can provide OTP messages so that they can access the media even when they are outside of their organization. With our previous solution, we were facing some issues in doing this."

"The most valuable features are Device Control, Content-Aware Protection, Enforced Encryption, and eDiscovery."

"I rate technical support as ten out of ten."

"All of the features are effective, but the highlight feature of the product was the data layer inspection. When we talk about a DLP product, data packet inspection is very important. Securing data at rest is easy, but securing data in transit is challenging. We used it comprehensively to secure end drives, data transfers, secure hard drives, and end-user machines. It proved monumental in our operations."

"The most valuable features are the ability to prevent access to external devices, and also site blocking."

"There are effectively two areas of DLP to look at from a technical perspective. One is how it performs the pickup of information traversing the system and the other is how the policy engine, which analyzes the data, works. On the first aspect, CoSoSys is probably best of breed for macOS because they're reasonably well-integrated into the operating system. They're looking at the file system operations level, not at the execution level."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

Cons

"It should confirm audit findings of the assigned area with auditees to ensure that the audit conclusions are based on an accurate understanding of the issues."

"We're facing challenges due to an upgrade in the machine learning model. The problem arises from some users abusing the APIs, resulting in an influx of suspicious traffic. Cloudflare's learning model mistakenly identifies this traffic as human. Consequently, it assigns it a higher trust score, akin to legitimate human traffic, causing complications in our architecture. Previously, such traffic would have been categorized as suspicious, enabling us to apply appropriate blocking rules. However, we encounter difficulties distinguishing between genuine and suspicious traffic with the new categorization. Despite these challenges, overall, Cloudflare remains the preferred solution compared to Azure, AWS CloudFront, and Google Cloud Armor."

"I believe they currently have this feature, but there will most likely be integration with APIs so we can control some features through API."

"The product support needs to be accessible from more places, a wider area of coverage."

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"It would be helpful if the solution could continue evolving to compete with the other solutions on the market."

"The documentation could improve for Cloudflare DNS."

"In the last two years, there has been a certain amount of downtime when using the VDM."

More Cloudflare cons

"We are using it to only apply media restrictions. When we are installing a new agent, we have to install EPP manually on a device. It would be great if the installations can be done from the server instead of me going to each PC or device to implement EPP or using a policy. They should have some sort of system so that a domain admin can install EPP on all PCs from a central manager."

"When you want to uninstall and reinstall, there are a lot of issues. You have to do a lot of workarounds to reinstall Endpoint Protector. This is a major issue that we have constantly because we still have old systems with XP. While there are only very few, we need to run them because there are machines attached that only run on XP. When we need to uninstall and reinstall on XP or Windows 10, we have serious issues left in the Registry Editor everywhere. There is a lot of manual interference to get the reinstallation to work. For the uninstallation of Endpoint Protector, they need to work on this so it doesn't leave any leftovers behind."

"In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled."

"Sometimes, it should try to focus on one thing rather than multiple things. Endpoint Protector does device control very well, which is why we use that particular function."

"This product provides zero-day protection for macOS, although I'm currently dealing with an issue on the most recent rollout of the Endpoint client that doesn't seem to be fully functioning."

"Endpoint Protector, in particular, had some features to be desired for the Mac operating system."

"If CoSoSys comes up with a suite of Host DLP, along with Network DLP and SaaS DLP, it will cover all of the aspects of a DLP solution."

"It would be better if they had an inbound restriction feature. For example, I work out of my home from my personal computer. All my policies can be deployed while working. When I am done, I should be able to use my machine as my personal machine, and all these policies should be waived. In the next release, I want time bound restriction of the policies because most of these users were working out of home and using their personal computers."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"The product needs to improve support."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of licensing costs, we don't pay for licensing for Cloudflare. We only establish communication, then for peering, Cloudflare takes care of the cross-connection in different data centers."

"I believe their performance has improved, but I'd like to refrain from discussing the pricing aspect related to the cloud. The pricing, in my opinion, could be simplified, and I think they should consider reevaluating the pricing for support, as it can be quite high. At times, this cost can make it challenging to choose CARFAGuard or opt for the support."

"So far I use free tier and happy with it. You can subscribe to business package if needed."

"When you compare Cloudflare DNS to other solutions, such as Akamai, the price is reasonable."

"We are using the free version."

"The price is reasonable."

"That is one of the great features. I was able to access the majority of the features and services for free."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

More Cloudflare pricing and cost advice

"The minimum number of licenses they sell is 50 or 150 users."

"This solution was not too cheap or too expensive. But for the amount of features that they are offering, it was reasonable."

"It has a fair price. They just changed recently from perpetual licensing. When I bought it, I bought it on perpetual license, then they changed the whole company policy to go to subscription. It was a bit of a shock to us because we haven't upgraded it that many times. However, after speaking to CoSoSys directly, they gave us a very good renewal price."

"This is a budget-friendly solution that covers all the aspects of host-level DLP."

"We found the pricing pretty attractive. However, volume-based pricing wasn't available."

"The pricing is reasonable for this particular market."

"When I last renewed the license it was for a two-year term, and they gave me the second year at half price."

"Pricing is quite reasonable. For smaller organizations, it lets them get into the product domain, whereas a lot of vendors won't even talk to them. CoSoSys is just about at that sweet spot of being serious enough that you have to budget for it, but at the same time, affordable enough that the value is well worth it."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

"Safetica ONE is expensive."

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

University

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Cloudflare. We are moving from Akamai prolexic to Cloudflare. Cloudflare anycast network outperforms Akamai static GR...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Cloudflare DNS or Quad9?

Cloudflare DNS is a very fast, very reliable public DNS resolver. It is an enterprise-grade authoritative DNS service...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cloudflare?

Cloudflare offers CDN and DDoS protection. We have the front end, API, and database in how you structure applications.

See all answers

What do you like most about Endpoint Protector?

Its robust security audit and compliance functionalities prove especially beneficial for businesses in sectors like B...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

There is an important feature that needs to be added. In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ESET Safetica?

The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus o...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ESET Safetica?

Safetica ONE is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ESET Safetica?

The SafeticaONE is great platform if youre looking for solution with DLP with Insider threat protection and Data Clas...

See all answers

Comparisons

Quad9 vs Cloudflare

Compared 50% of the time

Akamai vs Cloudflare

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Front Door vs Cloudflare

Compared 3% of the time

Azure DNS vs Cloudflare

Compared 3% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Cloudflare

Compared 2% of the time

More Cloudflare Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 12% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 9% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 13% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 13% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Safetica ONE

Compared 8% of the time

More Safetica ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare

April 2025

Download Cloudflare product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

April 2025

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

April 2025

Download Safetica ONE product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare DNS

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare is a highly-regarded Content Delivery Network (CDN) and a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) protection solution. The robust global connectivity cloud platform that is Cloudflare ensures users are able to connect to the Internet quickly, securely, and reliably. Cloudflare is one of the world's largest networks in the marketplace today. Using Cloudflare, businesses, educational entities, NGOs, vloggers, bloggers, and anyone else with an internet presence can experience more secure, faster websites and applications.

Currently, there are millions of Internet locations on Cloudflare, and the Cloudflare network
continues to grow every day by the thousands. The solution is able to fulfill the requests for
millions of websites seamlessly and serves on average 45 million HTTP requests per second.

Cloudflare has safe, secure data centers in close to 300 cities worldwide to ensure every
client request is filled as quickly as possible. It is Cloudflare’s edge network that makes this
possible by keeping content and other services as close to each client as possible, so the
information requests are always only seconds away.

Many organizations that work in democracy, civil society, human rights, or the arts are able to
access Cloudflare's highest levels of protection for free via Project Galileo. Additionally, official
election websites can be secured from hacking and fraud through Cloudflare’s Project
Athenian, also at no additional cost.

Cloudflare can also help organizations of all sizes develop a robust zero-trust strategy to
ensure the highest levels of productivity and profitability. Employees, stakeholders, and end users have a greater level of satisfaction and overall improved user experience, which can, in
turn, result in higher revenues and overall ROI. Zero-trust and BYOD (bring your own device)
access ensure end users and employees always have the best resources and technology
available to them at all times.

Cloudflare benefits

Cloudflare has many benefits. Some of its most valuable benefits include:

- Faster load times

- Robust DNS security

- Intuitive cloud Web Application Firewall (WAF)

- Free universal SSL

- Image enhancement

- Automatic browser caching

- Next-generation cloud load balancer

- Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP)

- Rate limiting

- Minification

- Zero-trust capabilities

- Cost-effective

- Reduced carbon footprint

Reviews from real users

“Many websites require an SSL certificate because they sell stuff and want SSL. Cloudflare
comes with an SSL certificate built in. It's automatic. You sign yourself up for Cloudflare, and
an SSL certificate automatically protects your website. If you have a connection between your
website and your host, the server, Cloudflare, and the host, you don't necessarily need a
certificate.” Spencer M., Owner at Tech Exchange

“What I like best about Cloudflare is that my company can use it to trace and manage
applications and monitor traffic. The solution tells you if there's a spike in traffic. Cloudflare
also sends you a link to check your equipment and deployment and track it through peering,
so it's a valuable tool.” Daniel P., Network Engineer at Ufinet

“The most valuable feature of Cloudflare is the GUI. You are able to control the solution very
well through the interface. There is a lot of functionality that is embedded in the service.” PeerSpot user, Competence Center Manager at a tech services company

Cloudflare

Content Aware Protection
Scanning data in motion
Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

Device Control
USB & peripheral port control
Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

Enforced Encryption
Automatic USB encryption
Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.

eDiscovery
Scanning data at rest
Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

Netwrix

Discover, classify, analyze, and protect data intuitively with a seamless user experience. Stop threats and stay compliant with regulations and industry standards.

Safetica

Sample Customers

Trusted by over 9,000,000 Internet Applications and APIs, including Nasdaq, Zendesk, Crunchbase, Steve Madden, OkCupid, Cisco, Quizlet, Discord and more.

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Mitsubishi Motors, Canon

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

April 2025

Free Report: Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.