Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Safetica ONE comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Netwrix and Safetica are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Netwrix is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while Safetica is ranked #27. Netwrix holds a 1.7% mindshare in DLP, compared to Safetica’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Safetica users who would recommend it.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Read 29 Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

4,421 Views
4,333 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Safetica ONE

Read 8 Safetica ONE reviews

3,362 Views
2,992 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Safetica ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Netwrix Endpoint Protector and Safetica ONE offer data loss prevention and endpoint security. Safetica ONE holds the advantage for users seeking enterprise-level features, while Netwrix Endpoint Protector is attractive for budget-conscious organizations.

Features: Netwrix Endpoint Protector includes content-aware protection, extensive reporting, and centralized policy management, appealing to users who need detailed auditing and flexible policy configurations. Safetica ONE offers enterprise-level data security and compliance solutions with efficient rule and policy setup, appreciated for ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Netwrix Endpoint Protector could improve its graphical interface for data presentation and enhance uninstallation controls for Linux. Enhanced application monitoring features are also needed. Safetica ONE requires better firewall integration and increased stability. Specific areas of improvement are noted for each solution based on user feedback.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netwrix Endpoint Protector supports various deployment models including on-premises and public cloud, praised for its technical support despite potential delays from time zone differences. Safetica ONE is recognized for its excellent support and offers public, on-premises, and hybrid cloud deployment, with noted differences in support efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Netwrix Endpoint Protector is considered reasonably priced, suitable for organizations with limited budgets, and delivers ROI through improved data control. Safetica ONE is costlier yet justified by its extensive features, offering ROI for clients prioritizing comprehensive data security at a premium price.

To learn more, read our detailed Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safetica ONE

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

27th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Insider Risk Management (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safetica ONE is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Netwrix Endpoint Protector	1.7%
Safetica ONE	1.9%
Other	96.4%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Sivakumar Mahathevan

Head of Sales and Technical - Malaysia at Halodata

Provides robust compliance with advanced threat protection and user-friendly interfaces

The features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector that I have found most valuable so far are the two main key modules which are Content Aware Protection (CAP) and Device Control (DC), which is the hottest selling item from my perspective as a consultant. I find CAP and DC valuable because they are very granular in nature and it's easily understood and easily configured. That's why it's easy for us to actually position this product to any organizations with no complications. My impression on the multi-layered protection features of this solution is quite positive because now they've expanded to more things in the DLP itself, that are as good as an enterprise DLP solution. Therefore, I feel that in terms of its pricing values and so on, it is very competitive. I assess the value of the comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities provided by Netwrix Endpoint Protector as very good because I am a user myself prior to this, before becoming a reseller and now a distributor. I am actually a walking dictionary for this particular product. The comprehensive reporting and auditing capabilities are quite granular in terms of gaining insights. We can actually deep dive into quite a lot of things and find a lot of information that they already have. Assuming if there's a breach, we will be able to know exactly where the breach has occurred and what has occurred, and they are quite granular in how they report their information, including their logs. Therefore, they conform to all compliance regulatory bodies too. My impression of the centralized management console feature of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is that it is one of the simplest centralized monitoring features that even a kid would understand, which is what we need in today's world—nothing complicated. My impression of the data encryption and control over portable storage devices features of this solution is that they are very good, especially the device controls, which I really enjoy using, particularly when it comes to portable devices USBs and the encryption tools that they have, which is another module called E-lock, or enforce encryption, that they do have. They are well-protected along those lines.

Read full review

Sonu Kumar

System Administrator at Logic Planet Inc

Comes with data leak protection features but technical support is too slow

We use the solution for endpoints. The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection. Safetica ONE's technical support is too slow. I have been using the product for six months. I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. I rate Safetica ONE's scalability a five out of…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In summary, we have not faced many issues with Endpoint Protector and it is fulfilling our requirements, as we wanted."

"There are a lot of features, but the main feature is that I can use a device serial number to unlock any particular machine or for all machines. If I have a phone, like a Samsung phone, I can whitelist that specific phone for full access wherever it is plugged into any of our devices. This is the same with a USB, because most USBs come in bulk and have the same serial number. I can then whitelist that particular USB to be read-write with full access."

"It is fantastic in terms of the granularity of the policies. It has many built-in policies, and we can add or create more policies as well. It is perfect, and it gives us more options. We have some users who go outside and then come inside. With EPP, we can even control those users who are outside. If they need to access the media that we are using right now, we can provide OTP messages so that they can access the media even when they are outside of their organization. With our previous solution, we were facing some issues in doing this."

"I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data outside. I also like its ability to protect against data leaks via emails and social media. I like that you can deploy it quickly, and it requires no training."

"The most valuable feature is device control."

"The search for keywords is very important in our security operations because one of the key use cases we had was for the ability to search keyword-based on an internal database of keywords that have been submitted by other project managers within the company that's around intellectual property. The ability to search on keywords was part of that."

"When the implementation occurred, we were functional within a month, with no need for follow-up support."

"The device control is a big deal for us because we can actually lock out removable drives and different types of hardware. It allows us to have better control over what end-users plug into their computers, and we can have deny lists and tighten our security posture."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"This is a good solution, is easy to deploy and is scalable."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

More Safetica ONE pros

Cons

"Endpoint Protector, in particular, had some features to be desired for the Mac operating system."

"We are currently facing an issue where it is blocking the Winman software, which is something that we don't want to happen because we use it in our accounts department to pay taxes."

"Endpoint Protector would be improved with more DLP templates."

"I would rate the role-based access features for administrators a six out of ten. There's work to be done on the granularity of roles that can be assigned to an administrator but there is role-based administrator access present. That's why it's not a zero rating."

"When we need to uninstall and reinstall on XP or Windows 10, we have serious issues left in the Registry Editor everywhere."

"It would be helpful if they offered discounted pricing for long-term contracts to serve customers who are interested in committing for periods of three years, five years, or longer."

"The reports and analysis could be improved. There could be a little more data, and the logs could be a little more granular, but it's nothing major. It does what it needs to do, and it's fine."

"It would be better if they had an inbound restriction feature. For example, I work out of my home from my personal computer. All my policies can be deployed while working. When I am done, I should be able to use my machine as my personal machine, and all these policies should be waived. In the next release, I want time bound restriction of the policies because most of these users were working out of home and using their personal computers."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"The product needs to improve support."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys is more or less the same as other competing solutions."

"This solution was not too cheap or too expensive. But for the amount of features that they are offering, it was reasonable."

"It has a fair price. They just changed recently from perpetual licensing. When I bought it, I bought it on perpetual license, then they changed the whole company policy to go to subscription. It was a bit of a shock to us because we haven't upgraded it that many times. However, after speaking to CoSoSys directly, they gave us a very good renewal price."

"From what we've seen, their pricing is a lot lower than the other stuff we've looked at. I actually don't have any concerns with their pricing. They were probably the most reasonable company out there for the features that were offered. It was pretty straightforward in terms of licensing, and you just pay for the license."

"I don't have any issue with the licensing and pricing. I would love for it to be cheaper, but at the same time I'm getting a lot from it."

"The solution’s pricing is a normal industry standard and depends on customers and salespersons."

"We have a limited budget for our media section. When we purchased it last year, we migrated from a different solution to this solution, and at that time, they told us that the cost will remain the same, but this year, they increased the price by 20% or something like that. I am not sure about the exact price, but let's say from 8,000, it increased to 10,000. It was a huge gap, and we couldn't bear this cost because we have a limited budget. When we spoke to them, they understood our problem and reduced it to the same price that we had last year."

"For what it's doing, the cost is somewhat high for us, but it's the cost of doing business with the clients that we have."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

"Safetica ONE is expensive."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating it is a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

The licensing issue was eventually resolved by the team, but the Linux client issue persisted. Not all the policies applied to the Linux clients were as effective as those for Mac and Windows. That...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Endpoint Protector?

Our main use case involved compliance requirements stating that we wanted to have DLP functionality on our endpoint devices, mainly regarding device control for USB peripheral ports. We wanted to p...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 6% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 6% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Zecurion DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Somansa DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Comodo Dome Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 8% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Safetica ONE

Compared 4% of the time

More Safetica ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

October 2026

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

October 2026

Download Safetica ONE product report

Also Known As

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

No data available

Overview

Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers comprehensive data loss prevention on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It manages USB controls and ensures data security by monitoring file transfers. Its intuitive dashboard and granular policy control make it a popular choice for securing endpoints.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector excels at safeguarding sensitive information by enforcing data encryption, controlling device access, and monitoring data movements such as clipboard actions and external device usage. This tool provides robust support and employs role-based access control, enhancing efficiency in preventing unauthorized data exfiltration. While users appreciate its capabilities, improvements in policy customization and deployment are necessary, alongside enhanced coordination across operating systems. Users also face challenges with uninstallation issues and require better network-level DLP features and interface stability.

What are the key features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector?

Device Control: Offers comprehensive management of USB and peripheral device access to protect against data breaches.
Content-Aware Protection: Monitors data transfers to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information.
Enforced Encryption: Ensures data encryption policies are applied for secure file exchanges.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides a user-friendly interface for managing security policies and monitoring activities.
Role-Based Access Control: Allows for tailored access permissions to enhance security and manageability.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating?

Compliance Support: Aids in adhering to regulations like SOC 2 and HIPAA through effective data management.
Remote Work Security: Strengthens endpoint protection in multi-platform environments for remote work scenarios.
Data Integrity: Protects against unauthorized exfiltration and exposure to malware.
Operational Efficiency: Facilitates centralized management of installations across different platforms.

Organizations across sectors employ Netwrix Endpoint Protector for data loss prevention, compliance, and monitoring capabilities. Its strength in managing device access and securing data on Windows, Linux, and Mac platforms makes it ideal for enterprises seeking to protect sensitive information. The tool's ability to support remote work enhances its appeal in diverse operational settings.

Netwrix

Safetica ONE provides cost-effective, enterprise-level data protection tailored for SMBs. It offers efficient data classification and loss prevention, focusing on compliance and ease of use. Competing solutions like Falcon and Trend Micro tend to have higher costs.

Safetica ONE is designed to meet specific business needs, ensuring data security on endpoints and in the cloud without requiring extensive infrastructure. It is valuable for financial institutions needing compliance with regulations and supports document management projects by integrating user behavior analysis, data classification, and basic functionalities at the browser gateway. Despite its strengths, it requires faster technical support, enhanced stability, and improved firewall integration. The lack of Linux compatibility, vulnerability scanning capabilities, and Google Cloud Platform support are areas needing improvement. Corporations utilize it to protect files effectively, accommodating multiple users under one license for seamless device integration.

What features does Safetica ONE offer?

Data Leak Protection: Prevents unauthorized data sharing and ensures data remains within the organization.
Data Classification: Helps identify sensitive data and categorize it appropriately.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects against accidental or intentional data loss.
Ease of Use: Simple setup for rules and policies.
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable compared to similar solutions.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Security and Compliance: Offers enterprise-level protection meeting compliance standards.
Integration: Supports seamless integration across devices and platforms.
Efficiency: Quick setup and deployment minimizing resource use.
Scalability: Accommodates multiple users with a single license.

Safetica ONE is implemented by companies in data-sensitive industries like finance to adhere to guidelines and manage documents efficiently. They utilize its features to protect sensitive information on endpoints and assist in document management projects by ensuring data compliance and secure file protection, using the cloud for effective management without needing extensive infrastructure.

Safetica

Sample Customers

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Mitsubishi Motors, Canon

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

November 2026

Free Report: Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.