Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs Safetica ONE comparison

Netwrix and Safetica are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Netwrix is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5, while Safetica is ranked #26. Netwrix holds a 1.8% mindshare in DLP, compared to Safetica’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Netwrix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Safetica users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Netwrix Endpoint Protector and Safetica ONE are prominent competitors in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) market. While Netwrix holds the advantage in cross-platform compatibility and features like Device Control, Safetica is favored for its budget-friendly options and intuitive setup.

Features: Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers Device Control, Content-Aware Protection, Enforced Encryption, and eDiscovery, making it suitable for hybrid environments with Windows, macOS, and Linux. Safetica ONE focuses on ease of use and compliance with a strong emphasis on data leak protection.

Room for Improvement: Netwrix could enhance its offering with network-level DLP and SaaS DLP and address policy granularity and uninstallation complexity. Safetica lacks Linux support and could improve integration with more firewall brands beyond FortiGate, alongside enhancing stability and support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netwrix offers on-premises and cloud deployment options, though customer service experiences vary in follow-through. Safetica supports hybrid cloud scenarios but shares similar challenges with Netwrix in terms of support delays.

Pricing and ROI: Netwrix's pricing is reasonable, but its licensing changes have raised concerns. Safetica, despite being perceived as expensive, offers competitive pricing against peers and shows potential for substantial risk reduction and efficiency returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.0%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safetica ONE is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Netwrix Endpoint Protector	1.8%
Cloudflare One	2.0%
Safetica ONE	1.9%
Other	94.3%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Sarang Bhagwat

Senior System Administrator at Exotel Techcom Pvt. Ltd

Ensures seamless real-time alerts and smooth deployment with room for Linux functionality improvement

The licensing issue was eventually resolved by the team, but the Linux client issue persisted. Not all the policies applied to the Linux clients were as effective as those for Mac and Windows. That was somewhat of a downside for us. I cannot speak to whether they have improved this in the past two years. An area for improvement is that when a package is provided, there should be no additional elements required from the user's side. For instance, there is an activation key, and you have to specify the host where you need to redirect and fetch the license. That was disappointing when it comes to mass deployment.

Read full review

Sonu Kumar

System Administrator at Logic Planet Inc

Comes with data leak protection features but technical support is too slow

We use the solution for endpoints. The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection. Safetica ONE's technical support is too slow. I have been using the product for six months. I rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. I rate Safetica ONE's scalability a five out of…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cloudflare One has assisted in securing my remote workforce through a SASE solution with Cloudflare One and the Workers part, although I am not currently using the Workers component."

"The blocking feature is very good."

"For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan...The most valuable feature is their protection."

"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."

"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."

"Clover is the best product globally."

More Cloudflare One pros

"Endpoint Protector is a facet of our visibility into the environment, but it's a daily-use facet."

"The console is friendly and it supports Mac."

"The most valuable features are the ability to prevent access to external devices, and also site blocking."

"The role-based access features for the teams that administer it is good."

"Compared to a lot of the USB management systems out there, Endpoint Protector is the only one that comes with true USB management and the DLP side of it. I'm pretty impressed because I've used several solutions with DLP and USB management, and I've never seen granularity like this solution has."

"CoSoSys can control most of this part and it has absolutely, 100% helped to reduce important data from going out of our organization."

"There are effectively two areas of DLP to look at from a technical perspective. One is how it performs the pickup of information traversing the system and the other is how the policy engine, which analyzes the data, works. On the first aspect, CoSoSys is probably best of breed for macOS because they're reasonably well-integrated into the operating system. They're looking at the file system operations level, not at the execution level."

"It is fantastic in terms of the granularity of the policies. It has many built-in policies, and we can add or create more policies as well. It is perfect, and it gives us more options. We have some users who go outside and then come inside. With EPP, we can even control those users who are outside. If they need to access the media that we are using right now, we can provide OTP messages so that they can access the media even when they are outside of their organization. With our previous solution, we were facing some issues in doing this."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

"This is a good solution, is easy to deploy and is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

More Safetica ONE pros

Cons

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."

"Automation could be improved where you can easily add a TLS and SSL certificate to an application or web app if the developer did not include it."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation."

"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."

"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."

"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."

"There are premium tier live service and lower tier live service, so we opted for the lower tier. But there is no medium tier where we pay a little extra and get a bit more service. So if that can be improved."

More Cloudflare One cons

"When you want to uninstall and reinstall, there are a lot of issues. You have to do a lot of workarounds to reinstall Endpoint Protector. This is a major issue that we have constantly because we still have old systems with XP. While there are only very few, we need to run them because there are machines attached that only run on XP. When we need to uninstall and reinstall on XP or Windows 10, we have serious issues left in the Registry Editor everywhere. There is a lot of manual interference to get the reinstallation to work. For the uninstallation of Endpoint Protector, they need to work on this so it doesn't leave any leftovers behind."

"It would be better if they had an inbound restriction feature. For example, I work out of my home from my personal computer. All my policies can be deployed while working. When I am done, I should be able to use my machine as my personal machine, and all these policies should be waived. In the next release, I want time bound restriction of the policies because most of these users were working out of home and using their personal computers."

"It would be helpful if they offered discounted pricing for long-term contracts to serve customers who are interested in committing for periods of three years, five years, or longer."

"When we need to uninstall and reinstall on XP or Windows 10, we have serious issues left in the Registry Editor everywhere."

"I would like to see an alert feature that when a system is started, it checks to make sure that the client has the most up-to-date policies."

"The areas of Netwrix Endpoint Protector that need to be improved include a desire for more graphical interfaces in their systems, as many people today would prefer to see graphical formats for data presentation."

"In Linux a user can remove a getent anytime. There is no control there on the file structure in Linux. So if this solution could give us information on what users removed in the dashboard, it would help us."

"CoSoSys Endpoint Protector's network-level DLP and integration with mail servers need improvement."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"The product needs to improve support."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The price of Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys is more or less the same as other competing solutions."

"I don't have any issue with the licensing and pricing. I would love for it to be cheaper, but at the same time I'm getting a lot from it."

"This solution was not too cheap or too expensive. But for the amount of features that they are offering, it was reasonable."

"The minimum number of licenses they sell is 50 or 150 users."

"From what we've seen, their pricing is a lot lower than the other stuff we've looked at. I actually don't have any concerns with their pricing. They were probably the most reasonable company out there for the features that were offered. It was pretty straightforward in terms of licensing, and you just pay for the license."

"When I last renewed the license it was for a two-year term, and they gave me the second year at half price."

"This is a budget-friendly solution that covers all the aspects of host-level DLP."

"For what it's doing, the cost is somewhat high for us, but it's the cost of doing business with the clients that we have."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

"Safetica ONE is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Pricing is competitive. Akamai is more expensive, in my view.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

In my opinion, Cloudflare One can be improved mainly through compatibility, as the integration should be much simpler...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform?

Cloudflare One's primary use case for my organization is to protect servers and to provide remote access with the VPN...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

The licensing issue was eventually resolved by the team, but the Linux client issue persisted. Not all the policies a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Endpoint Protector?

Our main use case involved compliance requirements stating that we wanted to have DLP functionality on our endpoint d...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 16% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 16% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 7% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 6% of the time

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Zecurion DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 12% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Somansa DLP vs Safetica ONE

Compared 9% of the time

Comodo Dome Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE

Compared 8% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs Safetica ONE

Compared 5% of the time

More Safetica ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

August 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

July 2026

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

July 2026

Download Safetica ONE product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

No data available

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers comprehensive data loss prevention on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It manages USB controls and ensures data security by monitoring file transfers. Its intuitive dashboard and granular policy control make it a popular choice for securing endpoints.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector excels at safeguarding sensitive information by enforcing data encryption, controlling device access, and monitoring data movements such as clipboard actions and external device usage. This tool provides robust support and employs role-based access control, enhancing efficiency in preventing unauthorized data exfiltration. While users appreciate its capabilities, improvements in policy customization and deployment are necessary, alongside enhanced coordination across operating systems. Users also face challenges with uninstallation issues and require better network-level DLP features and interface stability.

What are the key features of Netwrix Endpoint Protector?

Device Control: Offers comprehensive management of USB and peripheral device access to protect against data breaches.
Content-Aware Protection: Monitors data transfers to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information.
Enforced Encryption: Ensures data encryption policies are applied for secure file exchanges.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides a user-friendly interface for managing security policies and monitoring activities.
Role-Based Access Control: Allows for tailored access permissions to enhance security and manageability.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating?

Compliance Support: Aids in adhering to regulations like SOC 2 and HIPAA through effective data management.
Remote Work Security: Strengthens endpoint protection in multi-platform environments for remote work scenarios.
Data Integrity: Protects against unauthorized exfiltration and exposure to malware.
Operational Efficiency: Facilitates centralized management of installations across different platforms.

Organizations across sectors employ Netwrix Endpoint Protector for data loss prevention, compliance, and monitoring capabilities. Its strength in managing device access and securing data on Windows, Linux, and Mac platforms makes it ideal for enterprises seeking to protect sensitive information. The tool's ability to support remote work enhances its appeal in diverse operational settings.

Netwrix

Safetica ONE provides cost-effective, enterprise-level data protection tailored for SMBs. It offers efficient data classification and loss prevention, focusing on compliance and ease of use. Competing solutions like Falcon and Trend Micro tend to have higher costs.

Safetica ONE is designed to meet specific business needs, ensuring data security on endpoints and in the cloud without requiring extensive infrastructure. It is valuable for financial institutions needing compliance with regulations and supports document management projects by integrating user behavior analysis, data classification, and basic functionalities at the browser gateway. Despite its strengths, it requires faster technical support, enhanced stability, and improved firewall integration. The lack of Linux compatibility, vulnerability scanning capabilities, and Google Cloud Platform support are areas needing improvement. Corporations utilize it to protect files effectively, accommodating multiple users under one license for seamless device integration.

What features does Safetica ONE offer?

Data Leak Protection: Prevents unauthorized data sharing and ensures data remains within the organization.
Data Classification: Helps identify sensitive data and categorize it appropriately.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects against accidental or intentional data loss.
Ease of Use: Simple setup for rules and policies.
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable compared to similar solutions.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Security and Compliance: Offers enterprise-level protection meeting compliance standards.
Integration: Supports seamless integration across devices and platforms.
Efficiency: Quick setup and deployment minimizing resource use.
Scalability: Accommodates multiple users with a single license.

Safetica ONE is implemented by companies in data-sensitive industries like finance to adhere to guidelines and manage documents efficiently. They utilize its features to protect sensitive information on endpoints and assist in document management projects by ensuring data compliance and secure file protection, using the cloud for effective management without needing extensive infrastructure.

Safetica

Sample Customers

23andMe

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Mitsubishi Motors, Canon

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

August 2026

Free Report: Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs. Safetica ONE report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.