Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Safetica ONE comparison

"We receive a lot of insights from this product."

"The most useful features of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention are the transfer through Bluetooth can be blocked and the transfer to the cloud-based storage can be blocked. The features are wonderful."

"Some good features are basically its UAV Analytics engine. And even fingerprinting is really good in Forcepoint."

"The fingerprinting technology is the solution's most valuable feature. It's unique to Forcepoint."

"We appreciate the user-friendliness and ease of implementation of the Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention platform. The availability of the vendor support team is an added advantage."

"The solution offers very good sensitive data protection."

"Forcepoint's data visibility is the most valuable feature."

"Another valuable feature is that it provides integration to things like Cloud Access Security Broker, which provides security around cloud applications."

"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of Safetica ONE is simple."

"ESET Safetica is a cost-effective solution for customers who need a small quantity along with a competitive price."

"When you subscribe to the DLP, the system manages and protects your files well from the cloud."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"The current version of the solution is stable...It is easy to scale the solution."

"The most valuable things about Safetica ONE are its comprehensive features, competitive pricing, and a strong focus on data security and compliance."

"Safetica ONE is easy to use and set up. We can set up rules and policies quickly."

"The most valuable feature is the data classification."

"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."

"The setup is complex and has room for improvement."

"My opinion is that the dashboard could be improved and made more user-friendly. They do not enable a wide range of proper inquiries and we need to identify much of what we need on our own, like incident severity."

"An area for improvement for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is its price. It would be good if they could offer better pricing."

"One area that could be improved is the support. The current support is not very good. Because they don't come on time when a customer really needs it, they take a lot of time to troubleshoot anything."

"I would like to see improvement in the reporting. We can only get one week's worth of data; we can't get more than that. Also, the reporting console is very slow, making it very frustrating to use."

"I would like to see the product extended into the cloud as a single solution."

"It would be better if we could easily integrate with other products. Suppose I want to integrate this DLP with some other CASB solutions or a firewall solution. In that case, it takes a considerable amount of time because Forcepoint DLP doesn't come with a legacy firewall or CASB solutions to integrate with it. We need to do it separately. It's not improvised for different sectors, and I need to look for other solutions. I'm investing a lot of time researching and implementing other solutions for other areas. That is one point where I can't feel satisfied with this Forcepoint DLP. The only problem we have faced is that it consumes most of the CPU whenever a Forcepoint DLP is deployed on an endpoint. This is when users feel some lag in their machine's performance or their Internet performance. That's when we uninstall and try to reinstall, or we'll give a cloud link to which it gets access. We use Forcepoint DLP for endpoint protection, not for email or cloud. For email and drive, we went with the Google DLP. Forcepoint DLP isn't as efficient on drive or chat, or email. For that, we have some specialized solutions, but it would be better to have a single console where you can control all these areas. It would be pretty easy for a consumer who is going to use this product. All in one shot, you can try to track it and enforce your policies on a single dashboard. That is one point currently lacking in Forcepoint, and I feel they need to work on it. In the next release, I would like to use this DLP across different solutions like network, firewall, email, or chat with a consolidated dashboard and with integration facilities with other solutions. Security should work as a whole. It shouldn't work individually in blocks. It does not serve our purpose. It should be integrated with multiple solutions. For that, it should have enough intelligence to work with other tools. I'm looking forward to seeing that kind of capability with Forcepoint."

"Safetica ONE fails to support Linux."

"This solution could be improved if it was available on Linux as well. Currently it can only be deployed on Mac and Windows."

"The product needs to improve support."

"There are some minor issues with the price and support of the solution that needs to be improved."

"ESET Safetica’s stability could be improved."

"The solution's most valuable feature is data leak protection."

"Safetica One has every other thing that you need, so I cannot give Safetica NXT a higher mark because it does not have the full features of the enterprise solutions."

"One area for improvement in Safetica is its firewall integration feature."

"The pricing is fine."

"The pricing and licensing fees could be improved."

"They are flexible regarding the pricing and they have a good model for an OEM data classification tool... Forcepoint has been one of the most competitively priced products over the last few years."

"The pricing and licensing are okay."

"I prefer Forceoint because it is cheaper than Symantec."

"The licensing of Forcepoint is quite straightforward. It's based on the number of users. The support fees are a separate cost."

"They have to look at a different pricing structure for small to medium-sized enterprises because the cost is too high."

"The pricing for Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is more expensive than Symantec, but it's negotiable. It depends on how well you negotiate. The solution is worth the money, though, based on the services and facilities it provides to my company."

"Customers need to pay for a yearly license per device."

"The pricing for ESET Safetica is less as compared to other solutions. The customers have to pay only for the license."

"Safetica ONE is expensive."

"The licensing cost for this solution depends on the deal size and your use case. In our instance, it costs $35 per user per year. This is a reasonable price."