GTB Technologies Inspector vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector comparison

GTB Technologies and Netwrix are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. GTB Technologies is ranked #31, while Netwrix is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. GTB Technologies holds a 2.2% mindshare in DLP, compared to Netwrix’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GTB Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

GTB Technologies Inspector

Read 8 GTB Technologies Inspector reviews

1,011 Views
621 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Read 27 Netwrix Endpoint Protector reviews

1,732 Views
902 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

GTB Technologies Inspector

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

GTB Technologies Inspector and Netwrix Endpoint Protector compete in the data protection sphere, focusing on preventing data loss and maintaining security. GTB Technologies Inspector appears to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers more robust features, potentially justifying a higher cost.

Features: GTB Technologies Inspector offers sensitive data discovery, real-time content inspection, and single-agent deployment for DLP and data classification across multiple platforms. Netwrix Endpoint Protector provides sophisticated data monitoring, device control, and enforced encryption, with strong integration across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms.

Room for Improvement: GTB Technologies Inspector could enhance document fingerprinting efficiency and memory usage impacts. Expanding licensing options and third-party integration could also benefit users. Netwrix Endpoint Protector might focus on streamlining policy granularity and enhancing support for diverse application types. Increasing flexibility in role-based access and simplifying user interfaces could further improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GTB Technologies Inspector offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer service. Netwrix Endpoint Protector has a more complex deployment model, requiring extensive documentation and training resources but provides comprehensive support channels.

Pricing and ROI: GTB Technologies Inspector is generally more cost-effective upfront, offering quicker ROI with lower setup costs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector, despite its higher cost, provides advanced features that may lead to greater savings in data security management over time.

To learn more, read our detailed GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GTB Technologies Inspector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of GTB Technologies Inspector is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Endpoint Protector is 2.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Marcelo Grandchamp

General Manager (Founder and Owner) at nnhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marcelograndchamp/ovax

Enables organizations to monitor the network and protect themselves from data leakage

The initial setup process is very simple and easy. We have no issues to do it for ourselves or our customers. The deployment takes less than 20 days. The integration is very simple. However, first, we must understand what we want to have on our network and what we want to prevent. If we don't have this information before we start the configuration, we will be lost. We must know what kind of protection we need in our company. We have LGPD in Brazil. It is similar to GDPR in Europe. It prevents any personal information from being linked to other companies without permission. We have to take care of the personal information of our customers, employees, and partners. To deploy the tool, we must understand what we need to do. We must download the whole package and have our infrastructure ready to receive it. We must get the SSL certification and start to configure our platform. When the process is finished, we must roll out a small portion of our network to ensure everything will be well. After that, we must do the full rollout.

Read full review

Mohammad Amir Hossain

Head of IT Infrastructure at Samsung

Block USBs and manage ports effectively across multiple OS platforms

There is an important feature that needs to be added. In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled. If there is a feature that can notify in the master dashboard that an agent has been uninstalled, it would be very beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."

"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."

"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."

"The monitoring features are valuable."

"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."

"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."

"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

"The product has a centralized console for everything."

"One unique feature is drive encryption. We have portable devices, and they have a password vault. If you transfer any data to your device, you can use the password vault to protect it."

"The versatility regarding the exit point Endpoint Protector supports in making sure that important data doesn't leave our organization is vital for us. In the industry that we're in, data breaches are a significant concern. While our staff is contractually required to maintain confidentiality and they're all very aware that they shouldn't try and transfer company data of different classifications elsewhere to non-company devices, there's a risk."

"It is fantastic in terms of the granularity of the policies. It has many built-in policies, and we can add or create more policies as well. It is perfect, and it gives us more options. We have some users who go outside and then come inside. With EPP, we can even control those users who are outside. If they need to access the media that we are using right now, we can provide OTP messages so that they can access the media even when they are outside of their organization. With our previous solution, we were facing some issues in doing this."

"The device control is a big deal for us because we can actually lock out removable drives and different types of hardware. It allows us to have better control over what end-users plug into their computers, and we can have deny lists and tighten our security posture."

"There are effectively two areas of DLP to look at from a technical perspective. One is how it performs the pickup of information traversing the system and the other is how the policy engine, which analyzes the data, works. On the first aspect, CoSoSys is probably best of breed for macOS because they're reasonably well-integrated into the operating system. They're looking at the file system operations level, not at the execution level."

"I like the data protection feature. Our users were working on a client's CRM application with a lot of client-related EIA information. We did not want the users to be able to send any of this data outside. I also like its ability to protect against data leaks via emails and social media. I like that you can deploy it quickly, and it requires no training."

"The console is friendly and it supports Mac."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution is the device control, which manages any portable device connected to the endpoint, and content-aware protection, which controls data in motion from the endpoint to outside, like when users try to upload data to a web browser or an instant messaging application."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pros

Cons

"The tool should include better AI features."

"The performance could be better."

"The solution’s performance must be improved."

"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."

"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."

"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."

"I would like to see an alert feature that when a system is started, it checks to make sure that the client has the most up-to-date policies."

"The only aspect that prevents it from being a perfect solution is the occasional slower response time."

"Currently, for additional applications that need monitoring by the EPP, a request must be made to their technical support. It would be beneficial to add a feature allowing users to manually add applications for monitoring without depending on the vendor."

"They have many predefined classifiers in terms of data identifiers, and they should improve this."

"In Linux, it is difficult to control uninstallation. Users can uninstall it at any time, and we can only monitor that it is uninstalled."

"The policy engine could use a bit of work. They're definitely going in the right direction. We've been working with them over the last few weeks to try and optimize that. But it's reasonably clear that they're just not putting as much effort into the policy engine as into other things, like content discovery."

"The reports and analysis could be improved. There could be a little more data, and the logs could be a little more granular, but it's nothing major. It does what it needs to do, and it's fine."

"It needs to improve in terms of policy customization."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."

"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."

"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"The tool is not expensive."

"The tool has a fair price."

"The minimum number of licenses they sell is 50 or 150 users."

"We have a limited budget for our media section. When we purchased it last year, we migrated from a different solution to this solution, and at that time, they told us that the cost will remain the same, but this year, they increased the price by 20% or something like that. I am not sure about the exact price, but let's say from 8,000, it increased to 10,000. It was a huge gap, and we couldn't bear this cost because we have a limited budget. When we spoke to them, they understood our problem and reduced it to the same price that we had last year."

"[The pricing] is reasonable compared to what's out there."

"For what it's doing, the cost is somewhat high for us, but it's the cost of doing business with the clients that we have."

"It has a fair price. They just changed recently from perpetual licensing. When I bought it, I bought it on perpetual license, then they changed the whole company policy to go to subscription. It was a bit of a shock to us because we haven't upgraded it that many times. However, after speaking to CoSoSys directly, they gave us a very good renewal price."

"The software comes with a higher price tag when compared to other DLP solutions."

"This solution was not too cheap or too expensive. But for the amount of features that they are offering, it was reasonable."

"From what we've seen, their pricing is a lot lower than the other stuff we've looked at. I actually don't have any concerns with their pricing. They were probably the most reasonable company out there for the features that were offered. It was pretty straightforward in terms of licensing, and you just pay for the license."

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GTB Technologies Inspector?

The product has a centralized console for everything.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GTB Technologies Inspector?

The tool should include better AI features. It must enable us to make some predictions based on the behavior of my network or the end users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GTB Technologies Inspector?

We use Microsoft 365. We use GTB Technologies Inspector as a CASB solution to protect us from any data leakage in Microsoft 365. We can monitor the network all the time to see all the data that is ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Endpoint Protector?

Its robust security audit and compliance functionalities prove especially beneficial for businesses in sectors like BFSI (Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance) and Information Technology.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Endpoint Protector?

When we started, the price was reasonable, but it has been increasing over time. I rate the price as four, indicating it is a bit high.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Endpoint Protector?

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 35% of the time

Safetica ONE vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 14% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 10% of the time

More GTB Technologies Inspector Competitors

Safetica ONE vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 17% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 13% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention vs Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More Netwrix Endpoint Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Download GTB Technologies Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

May 2025

Download Netwrix Endpoint Protector product report

Also Known As

Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP

CoSoSys Endpoint Protector

Overview

Inspector is Inspection Software to manage any type of inspection to aid compliance, reduce risk, eliminate paperwork, and make you audit ready. Define what you want to inspect, when, the checks to be carried out, set pass, fail criteria, define incident creation rules, workflow and resolution deadlines. Use the mobile application to perform inspections on smart phone, tablet or mobile computer. Dashboards show compliance, incident rates and resolution activity. Start a 30 day free trial today.

GTB Technologies

Content Aware Protection
Scanning data in motion
Monitor, control and block file transfers. Detailed control through both content and context inspection.

Device Control
USB & peripheral port control
Lockdown, monitor and manage devices. Granular control based on Vendor ID, Product ID, Serial Number and more.

Enforced Encryption
Automatic USB encryption
Encrypt, manage and secure USB storage devices by safeguarding data in transit. Password-based, easy to use and very efficient.

eDiscovery
Scanning data at rest
Discover, encrypt and delete sensitive data. Detailed content and context inspection through manual or automatic scans

Netwrix

Sample Customers

Supya Security Software

Samsung, Toyota, Philips, Zeppelin, Western Union, eBay

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

June 2025

Free Report: GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.