NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs TruView comparison

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and TruView are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.7, while TruView is ranked #71 with an average rating of 5.0. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to TruView’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TruView users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 51 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

3,630 Views
2,650 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

737 Views
693 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and TruView compete in network performance monitoring. Data comparisons suggest TruView has an upper hand with feature set and perceived worth despite higher pricing and deployment challenges.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers comprehensive network monitoring, traffic analysis, and predictive analytics. TruView features integrated network, application, and infrastructure monitoring with deep performance insights, appealing to those seeking advanced capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT could enhance feature depth, improve application monitoring, and expand infrastructure visibility. TruView could simplify deployment, reduce configuration complexity, and provide clearer integration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView's deployment is robust but complex, supported by responsive customer service. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a streamlined installation and intuitive deployment, with consistent and prompt customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers balanced setup costs with predictable pricing and strong ROI through effective network management. TruView requires higher initial investment due to its features, yet promises substantial long-term ROI from performance optimization.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. TruView Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. TruView

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

71st

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE	1.2%
TruView	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

EdwardShim

General Manager at MOCOMSYS

Offers detailed network monitoring but requires improvement in deployment complexity and pricing

The price is really high, making it difficult for many financial companies to purchase immediately; it will take time for them to afford any budget for the purchase. The traffic data correlation feature's effectiveness with performance issues for clients remains uncertain as there are questions that need to be addressed through engineers regarding how many customers are actually using it. Regarding pricing and value for money, while the solution has the potential to save time and money for clients in the long term, monitoring solutions for performance management or network monitoring do not cause immediate damage to a company. It could lead to damage over time, but financial and management teams typically cannot see the immediate crisis. This is why many big companies Samsung and Hyundai try to build their own monitoring solutions using open-source tools and their own engineers, though it has not been successful.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the Vprobes, we quickly identified issues on the application servers, which we normally couldn't, where it usually would be a full circle round between our NOC and server people."

"It helps us get to the root cause quickly. It helps us find massive error codes, then we drill down on that error code, knowing that is the source of our problem."

"This solution provides us with increased visibility while conducting IT deployments. E.g., if we have devices which have overloaded or links which have saturated, then this tool tells us exactly what is going on with that link or device. Very few tools do it at this level for things like DDoS."

"The quick drill-down views are similar to Wireshark views. Those are quite nice, with the views on how you interpret some of the data. The granularity of how far you can drill down into milliseconds or microseconds is a very nice feature. It actually stores quite a lot of data in its database."

"It has versatility to correlate different traffic types and performance management statistics."

"The most valuable feature is visibility."

"The support is good."

"Deep packet inspection is a very useful tool as it works in real time and uses serial packet-level analysis."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

Cons

"Initially, we were having a lot of issues with bugs when using version 6.1.1. There were a lot of problems with the dashboard causing confusion. We worked with our SE and the NETSCOUT engineering team to fix the visibility with the data. There should be a patch release to fix this issue. However, this seems to be working fine for us right now after the 6.2.2 upgrade."

"We see it overload once in a while. It doesn't have built-in protection. Therefore, once it gets too much data, it tends to crash. Then, we have to recover it."

"Some help screens would be nice, especially if we bring on new operators. It would be great to see if they have more helpful tips available."

"I would love to have them reassemble fragmented packets. That would be a very big plus in my book."

"On a network the size of ours, the loading times seem a little extensive, 20 or 30 seconds to load up some graphs."

"Initial setup was complex."

"I would like to see improvement in the user experience. It's hard to manage it. We need a dedicated, highly-qualified person, compared to similar tools. Obviously, it's in a higher bracket, salary-wise. That's something the NETSCOUT team needs to focus on. It's a completely niche-skill technology, where we need to have the skills to manage, maintain, and deploy it."

"I'd like to see the nGeniusONE, the nGeniusPULSE, and the OptiView, their three separate products, work a little better together, a little more streamlined."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution has saved us more than $50,000 a month and freed up 30 percent of our bandwidth."

"The product is too expensive compared to other products."

"Cost is probably the biggest drawback. Compared to some of the newer vendors that have popped up in the space, it's definitely more on the expensive side... [But] it's been able to keep its value, even in the face of the cheaper competition."

"Their pricing is very competitive with other solutions... But what I like about NETSCOUT's licensing is that it's shared across all their platforms. They don't create a new licensing scheme for every one of their products. So for nGeniusONE, you buy a certain license level, and it works on all of their products."

"The platform is expensive."

"The biggest problem we have with this product is the expense."

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product may come across as a cheap tool for some, while it may seem costly for others."

"Licensing is flexible, it's not tied to anything else. We can easily switch up the licensing piece... Obviously, NETSCOUT is a little bit in the higher range, but it gives you value for money. You get what you pay for."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	37

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Regarding its high price, I give NETSCOUT nGeniusONE a seven.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs TruView

Compared 19% of the time

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 19% of the time

LiveNX vs TruView

Compared 16% of the time

NetFort LANGuardian vs TruView

Compared 16% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 15% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

January 2026

Download TruView product report

Also Known As

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

No data available

Overview

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

NETSCOUT

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Cerner Corporation

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. TruView

December 2025

Free Report: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.