NetScaler and Sucuri are competitors in web security and application delivery. Sucuri is seen as preferable due to its features and overall effectiveness, although NetScaler offers competitive pricing and strong customer support.
Features: NetScaler excels in advanced load balancing, application delivery optimization, and detailed traffic insights. Sucuri offers a complete security suite with malware detection, DDoS protection, and threat prevention. NetScaler focuses on performance whereas Sucuri emphasizes comprehensive security.
Room for Improvement: NetScaler could enhance its security features, simplify user interface navigation, and improve scalability options. Sucuri might work on optimizing its pricing structure, enhancing customer support responsiveness, and expanding integration options with third-party applications.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetScaler offers a structured deployment model backed by robust customer support, suitable for organizations requiring a traditional setup. Sucuri provides an easy cloud-based deployment, making it simple to integrate with existing systems, though its customer support experiences vary.
Pricing and ROI: NetScaler is generally competitive in pricing with a focus on network efficiency and offers good ROI in this aspect. Sucuri is perceived as more costly but effectively justifies expenditures with heightened security resilience and peace of mind.
One platform for a consistent application delivery and security experience because nobody has time to learn multiple systems to manage ADC deployments. NetScaler is built with a single code base using a software-based architecture, so no matter which ADC form factor you choose — hardware, virtual machine, bare metal, or container — the behavior will be the same.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.