Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nagios Core vs NetCrunch comparison

Nagios and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Nagios is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while AdRem Software is ranked #79. Nagios holds a 2.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Nagios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.
Nagios Core
Read 51 Nagios Core reviews
  • 3,994 Views
  • 3,475 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
NetCrunch
Read 3 NetCrunch reviews
  • 644 Views
  • 451 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Nagios Core compete in network monitoring solutions. NetCrunch seems to have the upper hand due to its ease of use and comprehensive support.

Features: NetCrunch offers an intuitive interface, automated network discovery, and a range of built-in monitoring tools. Nagios Core provides plugin extensibility, advanced scripting capabilities, and adapts to complex environments.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch could improve in areas such as scalability, customization options, and reducing initial setup costs. Nagios Core might enhance by simplifying its interface, offering more structured support, and streamlining the configuration process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch has a straightforward deployment process with extensive support resources, simplifying setup for various infrastructures. Nagios Core requires more manual configuration and relies heavily on community support.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch incurs higher initial setup costs but offers a clear ROI with its integrated features. Nagios Core, being open-source, has lower initial costs but might require additional investments in time for setup and maintenance.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
12th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetCrunch
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
79th
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
64th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (30th), Log Management (69th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 2.5%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nagios Core2.5%
NetCrunch0.4%
Other97.1%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.
Read full review
it_user1038504 - PeerSpot reviewer
A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better
The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The reporting structure and the feature set are valuable to me."
"Other products are good but from the configuration point of view Nagios is really very lightweight. The price is really good in my opinion. Another important thing is that my Nagios engine still works with Dual core 8GB ram for the last 10 years."
"We mostly use Nagios Core to integrate with Python and Bash Script."
"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."
"The application performance monitoring feature is valuable."
"Dashboard provides monitor of total assets."
"Provides timely notifications."
"Monitoring with Nagios Core is helpful because it provides immediate alerts if something goes down, such as a server, or wireless router, or if there's a cable break. This allows us to respond promptly to any issues."
More Nagios Core pros
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
 

Cons

"The core version is no match for the XI version."
"t was a little hard to get our setup represented in the configuration."
"I would like to see a sensor that shows the traffic of a user and what they're doing on the network."
"Would benefit from aggregations if a particular server goes down."
"The tool needs to improve the integrations."
"Nagios Core does not have a graphic display."
"It's not that easy to install the product itself. Also, the UI is a bit hard for regular users to navigate through."
"Nagios Core could improve by adding a user interface. If you want the user interface you have to use Nagios XI."
More Nagios Core cons
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."
"The product is cheaply priced."
"It's free."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."
"The solution is expensive."
"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."
"The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."
More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Agriculture
11%
Educational Organization
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise22
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?
What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?
Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nagios Core?
The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core Logo
Icinga vs Nagios Core
Compared 21% of the time
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core Logo
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core
Compared 14% of the time
Zabbix vs Nagios Core Logo
Zabbix vs Nagios Core
Compared 12% of the time
Centreon vs Nagios Core Logo
Centreon vs Nagios Core
Compared 7% of the time
Checkmk vs Nagios Core Logo
Checkmk vs Nagios Core
Compared 6% of the time
More Nagios Core Competitors
Zabbix vs NetCrunch Logo
Zabbix vs NetCrunch
Compared 41% of the time
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch
Compared 27% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch
Compared 19% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch
Compared 14% of the time
More NetCrunch Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core
September 2025
Nagios Core reportDownload Nagios Core product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
September 2025
NetCrunch reportDownload NetCrunch product report
 

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

NetCrunch is an all-in-one network monitoring platform designed for hybrid IT environments, offering comprehensive agentless monitoring of thousands of devices across different technologies and platforms.

NetCrunch streamlines network management with automated discovery, configuration, and monitoring through rule-defined policies. It covers monitoring across various environments, providing real-time dashboards, dynamic views, and topology maps. With its versatile features, it supports diverse IT ecosystems efficiently. It offers a node-based license model that enables scalable deployment on-prem, self-hosted in the cloud, or in hybrid settings.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?
  • Agentless Monitoring: Supports devices using SNMP, server metrics, virtualization, cloud platforms, and traffic flows.
  • Automated Discovery: Facilitates network configuration and monitoring via 670+ monitoring packs and sensors.
  • Advanced Alerting: Filters, delays, and correlates alerts to minimize false positives with configurable escalation paths.
  • Real-time Dashboards: Provides dynamic views and automatic topology maps reflecting device status and relationships.
  • Action Scripts: Offers 40+ actions like script execution and device reboot to manage network incidents.
What benefits and ROI can users expect from NetCrunch?
  • Scalability: Simplifies expansion with a node-based licensing model adapting to network growth.
  • Flexibility: Supports on-prem, cloud, or hybrid models for versatile deployment options.
  • Efficiency: Automates routine tasks reducing manual intervention and potential errors.
  • Reliability: Enhances monitoring accuracy with real-time updates and minimized false alerts.
  • Integration Capability: Works with email, SMS, and service integrations for streamlined communication.

NetCrunch is implemented across industries like healthcare and finance, ensuring comprehensive monitoring solutions that accommodate specific protocol and compliance requirements. It's tailored for seamless integration into various IT architectures optimizing monitoring capabilities tailored to industry standards.

AdRem Software
 

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch
September 2025
Free Report: Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch
Find out what your peers are saying about Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nagios Core vs. NetCrunch report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.