N-able EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #53 with an average rating of 7.0, while Trellix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.4. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 3 N-able EDR reviews

708 Views
687 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Read 23 Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews

1,802 Views
1,730 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and N-able EDR are both robust tools in the endpoint detection market. Trellix EDR stands out for its feature set and deployment flexibility, while N-able EDR is favored for customer service and pricing.

Features: Trellix EDR offers advanced threat detection capabilities, integration with other security tools, and a comprehensive feature set. N-able EDR is known for its ease of use, comprehensive reporting features, and user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: Trellix EDR needs better documentation, more intuitive alerting options, and improved user guidance. N-able EDR requires enhanced threat intelligence, better automation capabilities, and more robust threat response features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix EDR is noted for smooth deployment and quick setup, although it has a steeper learning curve. N-able EDR is praised for straightforward deployment and exceptional customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix EDR is perceived as more expensive but justifies the cost with its comprehensive features. N-able EDR offers competitive pricing with users reporting high ROI and quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

53rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"Trellix has done a good job reducing threats."

"If there is any malicious behavior in the workstation or server, the tool stops or isolates it automatically and generates alerts."

"The dashboard makes it easier and more effective to analyze data."

"The most useful features are behavior monitoring, DLP, and access control. The automation has gotten much better in the last two years than when it was McAfee. It works better now and integrates more smoothly."

"Trellix has a user-friendly interface."

"Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers endpoint protection and helps collect information while also allowing users to investigate malicious files in an IT environment...It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the solution's technical support team a nine and a half or ten out of ten."

"It relies on external systems for detection and then asks the endpoint to handle blocking. However, the most crucial feature is its investigative capabilities. With real-time search and other functionalities, it enables comprehensive detection and response."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"The dashboard and reporting features are not so user-friendly or intuitive, so they need some work."

"I'd like the tool to become more like an XDR, with one management system and endpoint activation."

"One of the issues about the product stems from the failure to work on its administrative scalability. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."

"The console has a lot of bugs, and it creates many issues."

"An area for improvement in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is the historical search. For example: when you have information on the artifact and a precedent, you want to do a search, and that is a bit lacking in the tool."

"The solution's downside stems from the fact that Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and McAfee MVISION Endpoint are not combined into a single solution, so from an improvement perspective, they need to be combined into a single solution."

"The alert feature of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response needs improvement because for you to get the alerts, you have to log on to the portal. What my company needs is a tool that sends you alerts. For example, if it detects a threat on your machine, it should send you an alert. My company gets the alerts instead from the antivirus software rather than the EDR. If you want to see the alerts on McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, you have to connect to the system manually. Another area for improvement in the tool is the reporting. My company needs weekly and monthly reports about the alerts, but you can't extract reports from McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response, so a decision was made to move to another EDR solution, particularly Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, next month. My company tested Microsoft Defender for Endpoint via a POC for one to three months. The resource usage of McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is also an area for improvement because it consumes a lot of memory. For example, during the on-demand scan, you can't work because of the high CPU usage. You need to schedule the scans. McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response has a lot of modules, but my company doesn't use all modules."

"The graphical view for nodes must be increased."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"The pricing is always high."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"Pricing is a problem in South Africa. It could be cheaper here. The rand-to-dollar exchange rate makes it expensive for us. A 25 dollar endpoint cost becomes quite significant when converted to rand."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price is reasonable."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 27% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 26% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 10% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 47% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 18% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Security vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 5% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

June 2025

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

June 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.