Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) comparison

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Download the complete report

Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Detection ...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Shiraz Ali

Networking Solutions Specialist at GBM

Provides a unified and multi-layer security solution

I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities. Having a single, more user-friendly management console, like a one-window approach, would streamline the user experience and make it easier for administrators to handle security tasks more efficiently. Sangfor Endpoint Secure currently only allows one manager to control clients, and it lacks a backup system. It would be better if it supported a secondary manager for backup in case the primary one fails, ensuring uninterrupted service.

Read full review

CESARCASTRO

Committee of IT Cybersececurity at a energy/utilities company with 51-200 employees

Enhancements needed for security alerts while ongoing training strengthens defenses

This year, I am going to improve some tools to be installed or maybe acquire some services to better manage our web services and work with my coworkers. Application fiber also needs attention. Nowadays I am making applications that are publicly seen on the Internet. I need some protection, possibly multi-factor authentication improvements. I am seeing, for workflows, some sort of ethical hacking to test our environment. Knowledge of everything, not only the product - maybe some kind of alerts - needs to emerge. I see the current ones as very low-tier, and they must improve.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature I have found in the system is its comprehensive end-to-end protection."

"It has a quick response time, threat intelligence, cybersecurity features, quick report generation, behavior analysis, dynamic detection, and quarantine features."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates."

"I like the tool's honeypot feature. Some features include having a honeypot to detect attacks in a certain area. Additionally, there is RDP protection, which means that when we remote into our server or any endpoint, we must enter a password as a second layer of security. It can also integrate with next-generation firewalls."

"What stands out to me is the dual-end user interface they provide."

"The tool's most valuable features are control access, endpoint security, and load balancing of ISPs."

"The user-friendliness of Sangfor Endpoint Secure is particularly impressive. Even with basic technical knowledge, users can easily navigate the system, make changes, and implement updates."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure pros

"The most useful features are behavior monitoring, DLP, and access control. The automation has gotten much better in the last two years than when it was McAfee. It works better now and integrates more smoothly."

"If there is any malicious behavior in the workstation or server, the tool stops or isolates it automatically and generates alerts."

"What we're using the most and what we found valuable in McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response are Web Control, Advanced Threat Protection, and Threat Prevention features."

"This is a stable product."

"It is a scalable solution and very easy to use."

"Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) offers endpoint protection and helps collect information while also allowing users to investigate malicious files in an IT environment...It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its area for threat detection."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to isolate or quarantine devices and block or detect Ransomware and other well-known tools that are used to exploit vulnerabilities on devices."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pros

Cons

"Sometimes, the VPN is not secure and doesn't work properly in Sangfor Endpoint Secure."

"Currently, the tool lacks reporting functionalities."

"The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure performs poorly."

"I believe Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve in terms of its user interface and management capabilities."

"It is complicated to establish a tunnel due to technical issues in the VPN system."

"There are a few areas for improvement. We have encountered licensing issues on occasion, and sometimes updates don't apply properly."

"When an issue occurs, the response time for first-level support and the time taken for meetings could be improved."

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure cons

"For Spanish users, it is necessary to have a knowledge base specifically designed for them, which is currently not available."

"The solution lacks the ability to integrate with external platforms. In future releases of the solution, I would like to see the solution increase its integration capabilities with external platforms."

"The dashboard is split across different platforms. For example, if you want information on Incident Detection, you have to access one dashboard, and for DLP reporting, there's a separate platform. This fragmentation means you can't access everything from a single dashboard."

"The solution's downside stems from the fact that Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and McAfee MVISION Endpoint are not combined into a single solution, so from an improvement perspective, they need to be combined into a single solution."

"The main drawbacks are resources and processing time, as it consumes a lot of CPU and RAM."

"The console has a lot of bugs, and it creates many issues."

"Trellix needs to focus on gaining traction with partners and building trust among users."

"Some modules that are doing machine learning and artificial intelligence are blocking our processes."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive compared to other vendors."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure is not a cheap solution."

"Sangfor Endpoint Secure's pricing is cheap. I rate it seven out of ten."

"Price-wise, Sangfor Endpoint Secure can be considered a competitively priced product in the market as it offers quite low prices compared to other solutions."

"The solution is cheap. It is cheaper than other products by 15-20 percent."

"Its "pay as you grow" model offers cost-effectiveness compared to major cloud providers."

"We were using Hyper-V. So, we switched to Sangfor because of the pricing."

"McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is reasonable in terms of cost. It's a tool my company has been using for a few years now. It costs $25,000 to $30,000 for six hundred users."

"The licensing costs attached to the solution are very easy to manage. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs."

"The price is reasonable."

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is always high."

"The cost is okay, compared to other products."

"Pricing for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response is not that expensive, but it's not something that a startup could buy. Pricing for it is for midsized businesses. There's an additional payment if you want data retention for more than thirty days. They gave us data retention for thirty days. Then if you want longer data retention, they have the paid option for a three-month data retention period and for a one-year data retention period."

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure has some good policy certificates.

What needs improvement with Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

The interface has too many buttons, making it cluttered. It would be better if it were a simplified version with fewer buttons and a more consolidated layout.

What is your primary use case for Sangfor Endpoint Secure?

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is easy to handle with its user-friendly interface. The four engines it utilizes for endpoint detection provide fewer false positives compared to other solutions. It is used...

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Trellix has a user-friendly interface.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

I haven't had any really great problems with pricing in the past two or three years.

What needs improvement with McAfee MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response?

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Comparisons

Compared 21% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Inspect vs Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Compared 7% of the time

More Sangfor Endpoint Secure Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 48% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) Competitors

Product Reports

Sangfor Endpoint Secure

Download Sangfor Endpoint Secure product report

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) product report

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION EDR, MVISION EDR, MVISION Endpoint Detection and Response

Overview

Organizations use Sangfor Endpoint Secure for endpoint protection and security management, managing devices, servers, and networks against malicious threats. It also assists in blocking websites, managing infrastructure, applications, antivirus needs, and aids in migrating to cloud environments.

Sangfor Endpoint Secure offers end-to-end protection, incorporating file protection, AI detection, behavior analysis, access control, and ISP load balancing. It facilitates VM migration with minimal downtime and includes a dual-end user interface for creating firewall rules, uploading images, and configuring VM settings. Enhancements such as Hyper-V capabilities, policy certificates, honeypot features, and next-generation firewall integrations are available. However, Sangfor Endpoint Secure could improve on console management, reporting functionalities, public cloud migration support, navigation, VPN system issues, licensing, update management, transitioning processes, and incorporating healing capabilities.

What are its most important features?

Comprehensive end-to-end protection including file protection
AI detection and behavior analysis
Access control and ISP load balancing
Ease of VM migration with minimal downtime
Streamlined dual-end user interface for firewall rules and VM settings
Hyper-V capabilities and policy certificates
Honeypot feature for attack detection and RDP protection
Integration with next-generation firewalls

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced device, server, and network security from malicious threats
Simplified migration from on-premises to cloud environments
User-friendly navigation and management capabilities
Advanced detection and behavior analysis reducing potential threats
Streamlined enforcement of robust security policies

Sangfor Endpoint Secure is implemented across various industries to ensure comprehensive security management and protection. IT departments leverage its VM migration capabilities for seamless transitions to cloud environments. Healthcare organizations use it to secure sensitive patient data, while educational institutions utilize it for safeguarding academic records and personal information. Financial services employ it to protect critical transactional data and adhere to stringent compliance requirements.

Sangfor

Reduce Alert Noise

Reduce the time to detect and respond to threats. Trellix EDR helps security analysts quickly prioritize threats and minimize potential disruption.

Do More with Existing Resources

Guided investigation automatically asks and answers questions while gathering, summarizing, and visualizing evidence from multiple sources—reducing the need for more SOC resources.

Low-Maintenance Cloud Solution

Cloud-based deployment and analytics enables your skilled security analysts to focus on strategic defense, instead of tool maintenance. Benefit from implementing the right solution for you.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sutherland Global Services

Sangfor Endpoint Secure vs. Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)