No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Reduxio [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared Mimecast and Reduxio solutions aren't in the same category. Mimecast is ranked #3 in DLP , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 2.8% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 99% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Reduxio users who would recommend it.
Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...
Read 97 Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reviews
  • 11,966 Views
  • 6,462 Comparison Views
99% willing to recommend
Reduxio [EOL]
Read 26 Reduxio [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection and Reduxio [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Mimecast and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.2
    Number of Reviews
    97
    Ranking in other categories
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (3rd)
    Reduxio [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.8
    Number of Reviews
    26
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    External Ganesh - PeerSpot reviewer
    External Ganesh
    Security Engineer at Comcast
    Insider threats have been detected faster and internal data exposure is now controlled
    Regarding how Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection can be improved, sometimes the tool is slightly laggy, wherein it would take some time for us to fetch the related logs from the Mimecast portal, and that of course can be improved. There could also be a graph or a kind of a graph where, if the organization has a smaller number of employees, it is fine, but if it has a large number of employees and different departments, then in that case, Mimecast could give us an AI suggestion upon how to improvise the current security posture, how we stand and where we can go up to in terms of implementing or tweaking the policies. As the organization's size gets bigger, it would also be better if Mimecast could provide some solutions upon how to segregate the users into groups and what groups can have which policies. Those kinds of features can be added. Regarding Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security could improve as I am not entirely sure how it works. It would be helpful if Mimecast could, as the AI capabilities are in place, maintain a strict governance policy upon the data that is being processed, especially for user personally identifiable information. As insider risk management sometimes also gets into the personal details of the user, organizations might be hesitant; even we are also hesitant to use the AI capabilities. If Mimecast could provide more information about how they store the data and whether the agents are local agents or cloud-hosted agents, that would be of great help for the organizations to consider its AI capabilities while adhering to the compliance needs of a particular organization.
    Read full review
    ITAdmini18be - PeerSpot reviewer
    ITAdmini18be
    IT Administrator at a government with 51-200 employees
    Point-in-time restore capabilities are built into the storage appliance
    Our first impression when we were introduced to the product was very good. I still think it's very good. They are truly different. The whole product is based on point-in-time restore capabilities built into their storage appliance, and no one else I know does that. I'd rate it a 10 out of 10 because it does everything that we have asked it to do.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "Code42 has excellent customer support."
    "Everyone has a backup now."
    "The best part of CrashPlan is that it just works; it's a solid, well-written product with great support that gives users a sense of security about the data that keeps the business working."
    "Client data recovery is possible without IT interaction for the savvy and medium savvy users, which lessens the load on our IT department."
    "Code42 Crashplan has saved us large amounts of time and money."
    "Set-and-forget (but email reports are available) backup process."
    "In that testing scenario, Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection shines with how policy enforcement and data protection is implemented."
    "Moving to a single endpoint solution greatly reduced our management time and weekly reports keep us on top of any changes or problems."
    More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros
    "After all the evaluations of other alternatives, we chose Reduxio."
    "The Reduxio TimeOS has been an amazing solution with far reaching implications."
    "The pre-processing dedupe engine they have instead of post-processing."
    "Reduxio requires zero upfront setup for backups. I get backups every single second for as long as I want with zero impact to performance."
    "Because of its ability to recover data instantly, we made the decision to make Reduxio our primary storage."
    "Improves the response of the VMs by having the most used portions on the flashcache."
    "With only a few clicks, I can provision or modify storage."
    "The unit has been running at 100% without an issue."
    More Reduxio [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "It is complex but Code42 provides a dedicated service engineer to help."
    "I think one we can improve is the compression."
    "I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."
    "My only real criticism with Code42, is that in the last year they have not focused sufficiently on the development of CrashPlan."
    "Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's customer support was good overall, but sometimes we did not receive timely responses, needing to wait two to three days for updates."
    "Sometimes we do encounter vague answers for some of the queries we have, but apart from that, the customer support response has always been very good."
    "A con to mention is that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, at times, may not capture everything."
    "​Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."
    More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons
    "The only critique that we have is it needs the ability to have local users added. You have to log in as one built-in admin account. You can't create your own."
    "We had a single failure of the device but believe that it was tied to the server losing contact with our NTP server due to DNS issues. As Reduxio is very time-dependent, losing sync made the entire array unstable."
    "We had a brief hiccup, a brief outage, during one upgrade process, but it wasn't too extreme."
    "I am waiting for the vSphere Plug-In with individual VM level control."
    "I would love to see deeper integration with VMware vSphere/vCenter."
    "I would love to see deeper integration with VMware vSphere/vCenter. Right now, I can edit existing Reduxio datastore sizes in the vSphere web client. Provisioning new datastores that way would be nice."
    "Scalability. Reduxio has only one product, they don’t have an option, for now, to expand the storage product."
    "Needs to be made easier to use with slightly older versions of VMware."
    More Reduxio [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
    "The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
    "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
    "It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
    "It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
    "The licensing is very simple with Reduxio. It is actually one of the attractions, unlike some of the other products. The other product we're using, in some of its incarnations, has extremely complex pricing, with every spindle having an associated license and fees. With Reduxio it's very simple. For the box - the hardware comes in essentially one configuration for the chassis, the unit (and you can buy multiple units and daisy-chain them) - there is no "a-la-carte," so many drives of this kind or that kind, etc. It has a basic hardware configuration. Then, through the software license, they allocate or assign you the right to use the full capacity, or half of it, or a quarter of it. Of course, if you're not using the full capacity but need to, it is a simple phone call to upgrade. It's as simple as it gets."
    "The pricing and licensing were favorable.​"
    "I think that you are able to buy a minimum capacity, then grow your capacity within the box as you expand your data needs."
    "They are very competitive in pricing, so I would definitely recommend Reduxio."
    "Only one device is sold. Negotiate the initial storage, but you can start small and move up with ease. Negotiate."
    "ROI is how much (time, money, resources) you will save in case of a ransomware attack because you had this box."
    "They have very competitive pricing and were able to work within our budget constraints as a public school."
    "I think the pricing is good value, because you're not just buying a storage array, you're buying a backup solution and a DR solution and a "time machine" solution, all bundled in one storage array. When we had NetApp storage we had to then go out and buy a copy of Veeam which is a backup solution. With the Reduxio, you still need to do backups but you don't need that software product."
    More Reduxio [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    15%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
    Outsourcing Company
    11%
    Construction Company
    9%
    Financial Services Firm
    20%
    Construction Company
    19%
    Outsourcing Company
    14%
    Manufacturing Company
    9%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business33
    Midsize Enterprise30
    Large Enterprise44
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business10
    Midsize Enterprise7
    Large Enterprise4
     

    Questions from the Community

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
    I am unsure about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's pricing, setup costs, and licensing details. However, I know that licensing details are user-specific according to the licen...
    See all answers
    What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
    My advice for those looking at Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to compare your use case comprehensively. Do not just rely on reviews, as they offer communal insight; evaluat...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?
    A con to mention is that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, at times, may not capture everything. For instance, the time that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 9% of the time
    NetVault Plus vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    NetVault Plus vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 7% of the time
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 5% of the time
    Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 5% of the time
    Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 4% of the time
    More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors
    IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 18% of the time
    Dell PowerMax vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    Dell PowerMax vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 18% of the time
    Dell SC Series vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    Dell SC Series vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    SolidFire vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    SolidFire vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 2% of the time
    More Reduxio [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    October 2026
    Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reportDownload Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Reduxio [EOL]
    October 2026
    Reduxio [EOL] reportDownload Reduxio [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Mimecast Incydr protects organizations against insider risk and data exfiltration, whether accidental, negligent, or malicious. It monitors endpoint, cloud, browser, and email activity to see when files move to places you don't trust, without requiring policies, proxies, or content classification to work. Administrators get a single dashboard for data flow visibility, adaptive controls ranging from education to blocking, and integrations with HR, endpoint detection, and identity systems to automate response as risk changes.

    What key features should users explore?

    • Shadow AI Visibility: Sees uploads, pastes, and prompts into GenAI tools like ChatGPT and Claude across endpoint and browser, with no policies required.
    • Adaptive Controls: Applies the right level of protection per user and scenario, from in-the-moment education (Instructor) to real-time blocking of paste, uploads, or removable media.
    • Departing Employee Monitoring: Automatically watchlists offboarding employees through HCM integrations (Workday, BambooHR, and others) the moment HR confirms departure.
    • Risk Prioritization (PRISM): Prioritizes incidents using hundreds of risk indicators based on data sensitivity, user behavior, and destination.
    • Block by Source/Destination: Blocks sensitive data (source code, financial systems, HR data) from reaching unsanctioned destinations, without writing regex-based policies.

    What benefits can impact ROI?

    • Faster Investigation: Reduces time to investigate high-risk incidents by 50%, verified by Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) research.
    • Low Administrative Overhead: Half of customers spend less than 4 hours a week on administration, without dedicated headcount.
    • Proven Return: 172% ROI and under 6-month payback, independently verified by Forrester TEI.
    • Automated Offboarding Security: HCM integrations remove manual handoffs between HR and security during the highest-risk period of employment.
    • Reduced Tool Sprawl: Combines DLP, CASB, and UEBA-style visibility in a single lightweight endpoint agent.

    Industries and use cases

    Mimecast Incydr is used across industries to address insider risk, departing employee data theft, and shadow AI exposure. Enterprises use it to monitor data movement across endpoint, cloud, and browser channels, automate watchlisting during employee offboarding, and gain visibility into how employees and AI tools interact with sensitive data, supporting both security operations and compliance requirements in regulated industries.

    Mimecast

    Reduxio's HX550 flash hybrid storage arrays, based on Reduxio's TimeOS storage operating system allow you to recover application data to any second in the past, eliminates most of the complexity associated with managing storage, and provides exceptional performance and efficiency, far exceeding anything available today.

    Reduxio
     

    Sample Customers

    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    Array Networks, Barnstable Police Department, Catbird, Dingley Press, El Dorado County Office of Education, One Workplace
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Mimecast and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.