Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs Yellowfin comparison

Microsoft and Yellowfin are both solutions in the Reporting category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.4, while Yellowfin is ranked #28. Microsoft holds a 3.4% mindshare in RT, compared to Yellowfin’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Yellowfin users who would recommend it.

Microsoft SQL Server Report...

Read 21 Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services reviews

2,458 Views
682 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Yellowfin

Read 2 Yellowfin reviews

183 Views
50 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft SQL Server Report...

Yellowfin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Yellowfin and Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services are products in the business intelligence and reporting category. Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capability with other Microsoft products and its flexibility, making it a good choice for comprehensive reporting solutions.

Features: Yellowfin offers advanced data visualization, collaboration tools, and dashboards to improve decision-making. Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services includes server-based reporting, SQL Server integration, and detailed report generation. While Yellowfin provides superior data visualization, Microsoft’s integration caters to database-driven reporting needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Yellowfin is cloud-based, ensuring quick and easy deployment with strong customer support. Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services requires on-premises setup, providing enterprises control and integration within existing Microsoft ecosystems, which may involve more complexity. Microsoft’s support excels in assisting large-scale implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Yellowfin offers transparent, cost-effective pricing, delivering strong ROI with low initial costs. Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services involves higher initial setup costs due to its on-premises nature, but the long-term integration benefits can justify the expenses. Yellowfin targets smaller budgets, while Microsoft offers value through enhanced integration and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs. Yellowfin Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft SQL Servering Services vs. Yellowfin

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft SQL Server Report...

Ranking in Reporting

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Yellowfin

Ranking in Reporting

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (44th), Data Visualization (26th), Embedded BI (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Reporting category, the mindshare of Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services is 3.4%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Yellowfin is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Reporting

Featured Reviews

MartinSimons

Senior Consultant at X1F

Ensures database access and monitoring have been manageable, but batch load analysis needs better support

There are occasions during maintenance runs when the Check Point monitoring system reports a lot of blocked sessions. This is typically due to system processes or maintenance processes that temporarily block themselves. Additionally, a tool within the studio for performing SQL analysis does not provide useful information for batch load processes, often advising not to use an index, which is expected with batch loads.

Read full review

Alex Chu

‎IS Executive at SAINS

It is a central source of up-to-date data and information, but needs more charting capabilities

Management information Reporting Statistics Data analysis It reduces sending copies of different report/spreadsheet versions over email, which makes it difficult to access the right report. It is also able to create information dashboards for various users' throughout. All management…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can create quality reports in real time."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It is scalable."

"With SQL Server Reporting Services, I can create reports and printable reports, known as paginated reports."

"I like Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services' automated reporting feature."

"The tool's valuable features are its drill-down feature, graphs, and charts."

"The stability of SSRS has been reliable, with minimal issues encountered during our usage."

"The solution's features are all just wrapped up in one nice easy package. I don't need a lot of toolsets to get everything I need done."

More Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services pros

"It is able to create information dashboards for various users' throughout."

"It reduces time to reproduce reports, provides easy access to organisational data, and has the ability to generate a wide range of reports and analysis."

"It is a central source of up-to-date data and information."

Cons

"I haven't contacted Microsoft technical support because of this tool, but for some other things I have, and I found them quite lacking."

"The complex tuning for report performance is complicated. There is a lack of native support for source code control. We often need to use separate tools like VS Code or other software to manage version control and changes in the database. It would be beneficial if source code management were integrated directly into SSRS, thus eliminating the need to rely on external tools. While CLI-based operations are exemplary, the trend is towards GUI for a better user experience. Integrating both visualization and source code management within SSRS would simplify the process for users."

"The solution's interface is old."

"The product could be improved by reducing the time it takes to build and deploy reports."

"The product should improve its performance."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"It would be really nice to have better integration between the solution and Power BI."

"In this solution, the cost should be reduced for the enterprise edition."

More Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services cons

"It needs more presentation/charting capabilities and integration with GIS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Value-wise, the solution's pricing is good for the price that we pay."

"The product pricing is reasonable in terms of suitable features for business."

"The solution is expensive."

"The tool's licensing costs are expensive."

"The solution is cheaper than its alternatives."

"The pricing is high."

"The price is pretty good."

"The solution is free to use for developers."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Reporting solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services?

I mainly use the solution for the ease of reporting and for executive dashboards.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services?

I don't recall the current pricing as it changes frequently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services?

They could improve the scalability and stability of SQL Server Reporting Services. I haven't used it recently, so I can't provide detailed suggestions on improvements.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tableau vs Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

Compared 17% of the time

TIBCO Jaspersoft vs Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Cognos vs Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

Compared 14% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Crystal Reports vs Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services

Compared 9% of the time

More Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Competitors

Tableau vs Yellowfin

Compared 40% of the time

Apache Superset vs Yellowfin

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Yellowfin

Compared 26% of the time

More Yellowfin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft SQL Servering Services

June 2025

Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services report

Download Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

June 2025

Download Yellowfin product report

Also Known As

SQL Server Reporting Services, Microsoft SSRS, SSRS, MS SQL Server Reporting Services

No data available

Overview

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

Microsoft

Yellowfin offers a business intelligence (BI) platform that allows users to interact with big data in a variety of ways. Yellowfin works to provide big data access to companies of all sizes, from small business to billion-dollar enterprises. It is designed for providing data quickly and allowing users to filter for specific results, maximizing gain from big data. Yellowfin has a variety of dashboards so the user can filter, drill to detail, and have data analysis in the same browser. The data can also be easily shared with others via email, wiki embed, and reports. There is a mobile app as well, which works automatically with the desktop dashboards to allow users to access their data on the go, and alerts can be set up to notify a user via email or push to a mobile device if the data is indicating a critical event taking place. Yellowfin also can map data to locations, providing not only the what of data, but also the where. Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust provides its community in England with mental health and community care services. Using Yellowfin's mobile business intelligence capabilities to deliver reporting and analytics to approximately 6000 clinicians, Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust was able to greatly improve the quality of its patient care. Yellowfin allowed the Trust to access and share independent data from mobile devices as well as create a Balanced Scoreboard to quickly gather and report information on the company's performance to its executives, management, and directors.

Yellowfin

Sample Customers

CMS Wire, The New York Times

NCS, Universitat Konstanz, AT&T, PG&E, SingTel, InternetStores

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft SQL Servering Services vs. Yellowfin

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs. Yellowfin

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs. Yellowfin and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services vs. Yellowfin report.

See our list of best Reporting vendors.

We monitor all Reporting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.