"The product is customizable so we can tune it according to our requirements."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"All of the features are valuable, depending on where you implement them. I've done implementations in 60 countries, across 86 different companies and groups, and each company has a different reason for why they want to use it. Every single feature that I've implemented has been successful, and for some companies, where they didn't use the functionality, they have moved to external products or they've integrated into other applications."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of the market."
"The most important feature of Microsoft Dynamics NAV is that it lets us centralize all our information so that we don't need to rely on any other software outside of Microsoft."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics NAV is its simplicity of accounting and receiving reports. The solution is similar to Microsoft Excel, and that similarity is good. All the functions of Microsoft Dynamics are user-friendly."
"It is easy to use, and it works very well for small-scale companies."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Its integration is most valuable."
"The solution has a lot of good integrated modules."
"If you are well versed in SAP, the initial setup is pretty simple."
"The most valuable features are that it's very customizable and it's flexible."
"SAP is a very process controlled application. It does not allow users to manage the data. Once the initial process is set, it works smoothly."
"The most valuable features of SAP ERP are the general operations. It has a good way to manage a business and do financial reporting. Overall we are happy with the robustness of the solution."
"The solution provides good production planning."
"The best thing that SAP ERP has is the extensive coverage of processes for every field and business unit such as procurement, inventory, financials, asset management, plant maintenance, and production. We can cover up to 99.9% processes of our organization, which is the best thing about this solution. It also has a very good capability to integrate with other applications. The security and authorization level of SAP ERP is very high. No other solution can match this level."
"In the next release, I would like to see a quality check module - Navision doesn't have one, and the industry very much requires it."
"I would like a more modular and user-friendly interface."
"We need to customize more often than we would like."
"I think Microsoft should improve on the process of how the user decides on a business workflow. For example, there may be some kind of drag-and-drop interface that lets us decide for ourselves how to develop the business workflows that fit our purpose."
"There is a lot of improvement needed in the top model, such as better integration with logistics, quality management, and data modeling for all revenue types."
"I wouldn't say that Microsoft Dynamics is very scalable."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"SAP is more expensive than some of its competitors."
"Reporting is why most companies need to acquire business intelligence add-on solutions, and when it comes to SAP ERP, they could improve the reporting graphical representation of the data."
"I'm only working on the front end with ERP's user interface, which isn't very easy for end-users. It's an old-school interface, so it's often challenging to find what you need."
"I think that implementation could be simplified."
"The integration with others application could be easier. There are many different features that this solution offers which could be easier to implement."
"The problem for us, we are one company that has seven home markets. Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. When we need to configure, modify rules, change policies, or taxes rules, when we move currencies around based on our other financial results, it can get very complicated. When we try to join everything together we have some problems. However, the process good, all of our material and procurement processes are going well. The problem is trying to consolidate the financial reports and this is where I have problems."
"The flexibility in using the software could improve. I am from a product background and I've been testing a lot of applications, for example, Informatics. The UI, features, and cloud version could improve."
"It was not designed to service all industries."
Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 7th in ERP with 19 reviews while SAP ERP is ranked 1st in ERP with 46 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 8.0, while SAP ERP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very easy to scale and the new pricing model is a lot cheaper". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP ERP writes "This is the best solution of this kind but has weakness in budget planning for certain user groups". Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP Business One, SAP S4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite, IFS Applications and Infor M3, whereas SAP ERP is most compared with Anaplan, SAP Business One, Infor M3, Oracle E-Business Suite and Microsoft Dynamics AX. See our Microsoft Dynamics NAV vs. SAP ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.