NGINX App Protect and Microsoft Defender for Cloud compete in the realm of security solutions. Based on the overall feature set and user feedback, Microsoft Defender for Cloud has the upper hand for its comprehensive compliance and integration capabilities.
Features: NGINX App Protect is highlighted for its security functionalities, such as security headers, proxy capabilities, load balancing, and WAF features that enhance security threat management. Its ability to integrate with diverse technologies allows for customization of security setups. Microsoft Defender for Cloud focuses on compliance and risk assessment, offering strong multi-cloud integration. Users appreciate its regulatory compliance features, security improvement recommendations, and proactive threat detection.
Room for Improvement: NGINX App Protect faces issues with complex configurations, throughput limitations, and a non-intuitive UI. Suggestions include improving automation and expanding network support. Microsoft Defender for Cloud is critiqued for inconsistencies in threat detection, a need for detailed compliance mapping, and challenging interface changes. Users also seek simplified policy management and better integration with non-Microsoft cloud platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NGINX App Protect is mainly deployed on-premises, and while its technical support is considered good, it sometimes lacks expertise and responsiveness. Microsoft Defender for Cloud performs well in cloud-based setups and hybrid environments. Its technical support is noted to be more suited for cloud-native issues, despite occasionally facing similar challenges to NGINX in meeting support needs.
Pricing and ROI: NGINX App Protect is seen as expensive, with licensing as a main concern. However, it is considered cost-effective in certain architectural decisions. Microsoft Defender for Cloud is also perceived as costly, with a complex cost structure varying by region and service type. Despite high costs, both solutions exhibit good ROI, though Defender faces challenges with perceptions of its comprehensive coverage costs.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
The biggest return on investment is the rapid improvement of security posture.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
They were quick and efficient when we had issues.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
Defender won't replace our endpoint XDR, but it will likely adapt and support any growth in the Microsoft Cloud space.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
It is a quality solution, and I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
There was more information from F5 regarding hardware requirements and specifications to deploy the service.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
The most valuable feature is the ability to operate in a DevOps environment and to be configured through API and pipeline by the developers themselves.
Detecting bots and blocking IPs have proven effective for securing applications.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:
NGINX App Protect offers:
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.