We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"API management."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The tool's visual features are attractive."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"Technical support needs to be improved, especially when you need help with more technical aspects of the solution."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 39 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Provides Integration Service Environment (ISE) for content-based routing, data transformation, and enrichment, enhancing integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration, Azure Data Factory and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.