Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Microsoft and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.4, while Wallarm is ranked #38. Microsoft holds a 8.2% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Application...

Read 48 Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

7,699 Views
4,669 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

353 Views
175 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Application...

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are prominent in application protection solutions. Wallarm leads in customer satisfaction due to its user-friendly interface and support, while Azure is preferred for its comprehensive application delivery platform.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF provides AI-driven attack detection, real-time protection capabilities, active threat detection, and targeted security using AI enhancements. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers an extensive feature set, web application firewall functionality, seamless scalability within the Azure ecosystem, and effective load balancing.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm NG WAF could enhance integration with third-party tools, bolster automated response capabilities, and improve real-time attack visualization. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could streamline initial configuration, enhance cost efficiency, and expand API integration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF is noted for straightforward deployment and proactive customer service, ensuring a quick setup. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway benefits from deep Azure integration for cloud-centric environments but may need more configuration initially.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF has a competitive pricing model, offering a high return on investment due to cost-effectiveness. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, with a higher setup cost, delivers significant ROI through its extensive capabilities and Azure integration, justifying its premium cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Wallarm NG WAF Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Wallarm NG WAF

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Application...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (3rd)

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

38th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is 8.2%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Bonieber Orofeo

IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital

Application gateway optimizes performance and simplifies cloud transitions

There are a lot of things I appreciate about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is beneficial for us as it helps in publishing our website, providing us comfort when it comes to the availability of our applications. The autoscaling feature in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is very obvious, and I have no issues with it; it is well planned and organized. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance. The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway helps us manage our AI-driven applications by enabling faster transactions, improving our work.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are the policies, the data store they are using, and the cloud platform it operates on."

"It has a filter available, although we are not currently using it because it is not part of our requirements. But it is a good option and when it becomes part of our requirements we will definitely use it."

"The solution's most valuable feature is an HTTP solution and SSL certificate. It is also easy to use."

"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."

"The tool helps manage microservices by providing developers with a platform to conduct tests and assessments on the web application. The custom domain option is one of the most valuable features I've found. This feature is incredibly helpful for the end-users of the web application. With the custom domain feature, you can change the lengthy link to a shorter, more memorable one. For example, instead of using a lengthy default link, you can customize it to something like imail.com, which is much easier to remember and share."

"The pricing is quite good."

"I like the tool's stability and performance."

"Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros

"Helps us to monitor situation in regards to attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them."

Cons

"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."

"The support can be improved when you are configuring the system rules. The Disaster Recovery feature can be added in the next release. The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."

"The product could be easier to use and implement."

"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is harder to manage than Imperva. It is not intuitive and stable compared to other products."

"The tool is a pain to deal with when it comes to the area of configuration."

"The solution is easy to use overall, but the dashboard could be updated with a better layout and graphical design so that we can see the data a bit easier. Microsoft could also add more documentation. The documentation Microsoft provides doesn't tell us about resource requirements. We found that the instances we had weren't sufficient to support the firewall, so we had to increase them."

"I want the solution's support to improve. The tool is also expensive."

"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway cons

"The biggest problem for us was the stability and speed using the first version of Wallarm. Now, it is fine."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a need to pay a fixed price per month to use the product. There are no additional payments to be made to Microsoft apart from the charges paid towards the monthly licensing costs attached to the solution."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced compared to other solutions."

"The solution's pricing is not complex. It is not expensive from our point of view."

"Regarding pricing for Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it at seven."

"I rate the price of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway an eight out of ten."

"The solution is paid monthly. The solution is highly expensive."

"The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing and cost advice

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 12% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Competitors

Akamai API Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 25% of the time

Fastly vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 17% of the time

Salt Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 13% of the time

Cequence Security vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Wallarm NG WAF

Compared 12% of the time

More Wallarm NG WAF Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

June 2025

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Wallarm NG WAF is utilized to protect against web application threats, enhance security policies, and ensure consistent application security. It provides real-time attack prevention, detailed threat analytics, and automated incident response, making it suitable for both small and large-scale environments.

Wallarm NG WAF offers comprehensive API protection and adaptive security measures integrated with DevOps workflows. It efficiently detects and blocks attacks using AI-driven detection algorithms and provides thorough coverage against OWASP Top 10 threats. Users benefit from its easy deployment, scalability, and user-friendly configuration. Detailed analytics and robust performance in diverse environments make it a reliable option. However, users suggest improvements in documentation, customer support, update frequency, initial configuration process, and better integration capabilities to enhance the overall experience.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

Real-time attack prevention: Offers immediate protection against web application threats.
AI-driven detection algorithms: Efficiently identifies and blocks malicious activities.
DevOps integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools and workflows.
OWASP Top 10 coverage: Provides comprehensive protection against top security risks.
Detailed analytics: Delivers in-depth threat analysis for better security management.
Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale environments.
Easy deployment: Quick and simple setup process for immediate use.

What benefits should you look for in Wallarm NG WAF reviews?

Enhanced security policies: Strengthens overall application security.
Consistent application security: Ensures uniform protection across all applications.
Automated incident response: Reduces manual intervention during security events.
Comprehensive API protection: Safeguards all API interactions effectively.
Adaptive security measures: Adjusts defenses based on emerging threats.
User-friendly configuration: Simplifies initial setup and ongoing management.
Robust performance: Maintains high security standards in various environments.

Wallarm NG WAF is implemented across different industries, including finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. It addresses their unique security needs by providing adaptive protections, detailed threat analytics, and integration capabilities. The scalability and ease of deployment make it an ideal choice for organizations managing large-scale applications and APIs.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Wallarm NG WAF

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Wallarm NG WAF

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Wallarm NG WAF and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Wallarm NG WAF report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.