Link11 vs Wallarm NG WAF comparison

Link11 and Wallarm are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Link11 is ranked #64, while Wallarm is ranked #38. Link11 holds a 0.1% mindshare in WAF, compared to Wallarm’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Link11 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Wallarm users who would recommend it.

Link11

Read 10 Link11 reviews

65 Views
19 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wallarm NG WAF

Read 5 Wallarm NG WAF reviews

355 Views
169 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Link11

Wallarm NG WAF

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 6, 2025

Wallarm NG WAF and Link11 compete in web application security. Wallarm NG WAF often has an advantage due to its ease of use and integration capabilities, whereas Link11 stands out with its comprehensive security features, which are considered worth the higher cost by some tech buyers.

Features: Wallarm NG WAF offers AI-driven API security, automatic threat detection, and adaptive security rules. Link11 provides robust DDoS protection, real-time threat analysis, and an extensive vulnerability scanning system.

Room for Improvement: Wallarm NG WAF could enhance its user interface for more intuitive navigation, reduce its false positive rate, and expand its customer support options. Link11 could improve its integration flexibility to cater to diverse environments, simplify its configuration processes, and offer more budget-friendly pricing tiers for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wallarm NG WAF is praised for seamless cloud integration and efficient setup, with responsive support. Link11 also offers straightforward deployment, complimented by its extensive and personalized customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Wallarm NG WAF is noted for its competitive pricing that promises good ROI for cost-effective security solutions. Link11, while requiring a more substantial initial investment, is known for delivering superior long-term security ROI due to its robust feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Link11

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

64th

Ranking in API Security

31st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (21st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (25th)

Wallarm NG WAF

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

38th

Ranking in API Security

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Link11 is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wallarm NG WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks

There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town. AWS WAF, the Web Application Firewall from AWS, has a vast database of bad IP addresses due to its long-standing presence in this business. Reblaze, being a new entrant, is still building its database of bad IP addresses and malicious systems. So, Reblaze needs to work on that aspect. But other than that, I don't think scaling Reblaze has been an issue. There were some initial glitches, but they were all sorted out. So currently, I would say that the bot management and the database are areas they should focus on for further improvement.

Read full review

it_user796242

Information Security Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Helps us to monitor attacks to our sites and prevents a lot of them

Set up Wallarm as a reverse proxy. Do not replace your web server. Use Wallarm first in monitoring mode, then learn from Wallarm which type of request is false positive and which type of request is not. This process takes a couple of weeks for very highly-loaded web applications (few millions of unique visitors in one month). Then you can turn Wallarm into blocking mode and everything will be fine. Do not forget to build a monitoring system, the wave, and API for it. Before we started using Wallarm, I already knew Ivan (CEO) and Stepan (COO) from a couple of years before. Ivan had his own security company and Stepan was working on a Russian security magazine called Xakep. They told us that they wanted to create a new WAF and already had a working version of it. They asked me to test it. We did tests, and it was really good. After few month after testing, we signed an agreement. Our choice was made not because we knew these guys for a long time, but because the product was really cool and we were glad to start using it as one of the first on the market!

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I find most valuable is the user-friendly dashboard. It is easy to understand how everything works and it allows you to make decisions quickly and efficiently."

"The best thing about Reblaze, for us, is that it has been a game changer because previously, we were using Google's Web Application Firewall, but it wasn't up to the mark."

"We like the website protection. It's really good. The dashboard is really simple to use."

"Provides mobile app security."

"Reblaze knows how to manage security. For me as, someone who knows little about security, it's good that I have a firm that optimizes everything according to their standards. It's their responsibility and they are fully hands-on."

"I very much like the elastic search and reports, allowing us to have a 360-degree view of the customer's activities and enabling us to track down any suspicious bots."

"The most valuable features were the real-time monitoring and the management. With this kind of product, you need a very good management system to allow you to see false positives in real-time; to see what's happening in real-time... The clarity stood out. It was very visible and very easy to navigate; very easy to find the data we were looking for."

"It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease."

Cons

"Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have. But besides that, up until now, I am really pleased with their service and I've also recommended them to some of my clients."

"Some of the settings on the dashboard are confusing."

"They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."

"We have multiple products behind different instances of Reblaze. We have one instance for staging and then we have a production instance for multiple products. One of the things that we have requested is a unified view panel, so that we can see each of the instances in a unified view. That way, we won't have to go bouncing from instance to instance."

"The WAF features are not as granular as we would expect from a WAF system. There should be more granularity and in-depth rules, out-of-the-box."

"It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level requirements."

"The next release should have next-generation automation."

"I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a monthly basis we pay $750."

"There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."

"I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."

"We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."

"Pricing must be cheaper than the competition and the licensing must be good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

15%

Insurance Company

14%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Reblaze?

It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Reblaze?

We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration. It is worth mentioning that these figures might not be current....

See all answers

What needs improvement with Reblaze?

There is a potential improvement regarding simplifying the complexity of rule creation. It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level re...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Link11

Compared 46% of the time

AWS WAF vs Link11

Compared 12% of the time

Akamai App and API Protector vs Link11

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Link11

Compared 8% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Link11

Compared 7% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

June 2025

Download Link11 product report

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download Wallarm NG WAF product report

Also Known As

Reblaze

Wallarm NG-WAF

Overview

Link11, headquartered in Germany, offers cloud-based IT security services designed to prevent business disruptions, enhancing cyber resilience for IT networks and critical applications globally. Their services benefit industries across Europe, North America, and Asia with comprehensive protection.

Link11 provides a range of security and performance solutions, including Network Security, Web Application & API Protection, and Application Performance solutions. Their offerings encompass Network DDoS protection and an all-in-one WAAP solution, featuring Web Application Firewall, Web DDoS Protection, Bot Management, API Protection, and Secure CDN & DNS. A high-performance global network, monitored 24/7 by the Link11 Security Operations Center, ensures robust defense mechanisms.

What are the key features of Link11?

User-friendly dashboard simplifies monitoring and management.
Real-time monitoring provides instant visibility into potential threats.
Advanced DDoS protection safeguards against various attack vectors.
API integration enhances mobile app security.
Comprehensive bot management includes ATO and botnet blocking.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Seamless security management supported by dedicated customer support channels.
Efficient rule creation and prioritization streamline security workflows.
Continuous improvements in filtering against SQL and script injections enhance security.
Effective activity monitoring provides alerts on suspicious activities.

Link11 is suited for industries wanting to protect web applications against Layer 7 DDoS attacks, cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and phishing attempts. Deployed on cloud models, Link11 integrates as a fundamental security layer, offering effective bot management and securing websites with multiple technologies.

Link11

Wallarm NG WAF is utilized to protect against web application threats, enhance security policies, and ensure consistent application security. It provides real-time attack prevention, detailed threat analytics, and automated incident response, making it suitable for both small and large-scale environments.

Wallarm NG WAF offers comprehensive API protection and adaptive security measures integrated with DevOps workflows. It efficiently detects and blocks attacks using AI-driven detection algorithms and provides thorough coverage against OWASP Top 10 threats. Users benefit from its easy deployment, scalability, and user-friendly configuration. Detailed analytics and robust performance in diverse environments make it a reliable option. However, users suggest improvements in documentation, customer support, update frequency, initial configuration process, and better integration capabilities to enhance the overall experience.

What are the key features of Wallarm NG WAF?

Real-time attack prevention: Offers immediate protection against web application threats.
AI-driven detection algorithms: Efficiently identifies and blocks malicious activities.
DevOps integration: Seamlessly integrates with DevOps tools and workflows.
OWASP Top 10 coverage: Provides comprehensive protection against top security risks.
Detailed analytics: Delivers in-depth threat analysis for better security management.
Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale environments.
Easy deployment: Quick and simple setup process for immediate use.

What benefits should you look for in Wallarm NG WAF reviews?

Enhanced security policies: Strengthens overall application security.
Consistent application security: Ensures uniform protection across all applications.
Automated incident response: Reduces manual intervention during security events.
Comprehensive API protection: Safeguards all API interactions effectively.
Adaptive security measures: Adjusts defenses based on emerging threats.
User-friendly configuration: Simplifies initial setup and ongoing management.
Robust performance: Maintains high security standards in various environments.

Wallarm NG WAF is implemented across different industries, including finance, healthcare, and e-commerce. It addresses their unique security needs by providing adaptive protections, detailed threat analytics, and integration capabilities. The scalability and ease of deployment make it an ideal choice for organizations managing large-scale applications and APIs.

Wallarm

Sample Customers

CBC, Hermes, Gartner

Panasonic. Miro. Rappi. Wargaming. Gannett. Omio. Acronis. Workforce Software. Tipalti. SEMRush.

Buyer's Guide

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors and best API Security vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.