"The solution adds an extra layer of security."
"The solution is free to use and you can use it for every service."
"It offers good Microsoft integration capabilities."
"Don't delay implementing this solution, it's the best thing you can do for your identity protection."
"It has been stable, and we haven't had any issues since we started to use it."
"Microsoft Authenticator is as easy as Google Authenticator, but it is not open to all types of applications. Google Authenticator is integrated with other third-party platforms and applications, whereas Microsoft Authenticator is not. It should have more integration with third-party platforms and applications."
"Adding a new account can be tricky."
"The pricing is okay, however, it could always be better in the future."
"Lacks integration between applications and phones."
"It would be an improvement if Authenticator made it easier to recover the app if you reboot your cellphone and lose access."
"I think that the connection with like Microsoft Word, especially for Office 365, is a weak point that could be improved."
"The timing of the token validity, if it could be extended, would be great. I'm not sure if there is even an option to configure these types of settings."
Microsoft Authenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 5 reviews while PingID is ranked 6th in Authentication Systems with 2 reviews. Microsoft Authenticator is rated 8.4, while PingID is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Authenticator writes "Free to use with a good user interface and good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingID writes "Stable, popular with customers, and has a good mobile application". Microsoft Authenticator is most compared with Duo Security, Fortinet FortiToken, RSA SecurID Access, Symantec VIP Access Manager and Yubico YubiKey, whereas PingID is most compared with Azure Active Directory, RSA SecurID Access, SailPoint IdentityIQ, ForgeRock and Symantec Siteminder. See our Microsoft Authenticator vs. PingID report.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
