We compared Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID both offer valuable features such as efficient device management and seamless authentication processes. Intune focuses on security measures and integration with enterprise systems, while Entra ID emphasizes user-friendly interfaces and platform integration. Users praise Intune for its prompt customer service and cost-effectiveness, while Entra ID users appreciate its affordability and efficiency. However, Intune users suggest improvements in user interface and performance, while Entra ID users seek enhancements in UI design and customization options.
Features: Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID have different valuable features. Intune offers data wipe and device reset, integration with enterprise systems, and control over user access. Entra ID focuses on user-friendly interface, efficient authentication, and seamless integration with platforms.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Microsoft Intune is praised for its reasonable pricing and cost-effectiveness. Users find the licensing options to be flexible and accommodating. On the other hand, users have expressed a positive sentiment towards Microsoft Entra ID's pricing, setup cost, and licensing. They appreciate the affordability, competitive pricing, and user-friendly setup process. The licensing options are also seen as flexible and suitable for various needs and budgets., The ROI from Microsoft Intune demonstrated effective cost management, increased productivity, secure device management, streamlined workflows, seamless integration, time savings, enhanced user experience, and improved security measures. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID offers significant cost savings, improved efficiency, streamlined business processes, and increased productivity.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Intune could improve its user interface, speed, customization options, and troubleshooting features. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID needs enhancements in its user interface, optimization for different devices, usability, sign-up process, customization options, and security features.
Deployment and customer support: The users' reviews for Microsoft Intune indicate that the duration to establish the tech solution can vary, with some users reporting separate phases of deployment and setup, while others consider both terms to refer to the same period. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID user reviews also show variability in the duration required, with some users reporting distinct deployment and setup phases, and others considering them as one., The customer service provided by Microsoft Intune is highly praised for its prompt assistance and knowledgeable support staff. Customers value feeling supported throughout their interactions. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID's customer service is highlighted for its exceptional efficiency, reliability, and helpfulness. The support team is praised for their friendliness, professionalism, and effective communication, ensuring seamless problem resolution.
The summary above is based on 193 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Intune and Microsoft Entra ID users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature is Conditional Access, and we use it extensively."
"The scalability of the product is decent."
"The solution scales well."
"The portal version of the Azure active directory is pretty robust."
"The way the laptops are joined is valuable. We can take advantage of that in terms of being able to log in and do things. It is easier to change passwords or set things up."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID is its security options, where we can provide highly effective security for user accounts during authentication."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to deploy and make changes to every workstation that I need to. We use it to control policy and I can apply the right policies to all our 1,500 workstations, notebooks, et cetera."
"I like Azure AD's conditional access policies. Microsoft Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, improving the overall user experience."
"The aspects I find most valuable are the managing the data and applications. I can also restrict the users to install any applications. I can also wipe the data if the phone was missplaced or stolen. These are the basics for me."
"Remote Wipe and Autopilot is one of the best features."
"Intune can wipe devices. For example, if a disgruntled employee wants to leak the data on their company phone, Intune can terminate their access and wipe the entire device with a click."
"With on-premises Active Directory, the main challenge was that we had no control when a user was working from home. We didn't know what exactly a user was doing and whether the AV was up to date or not. Intune provides better control of their machines."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"Based on my experience, I find Intune very flexible for managing Windows devices. We can use scripting, and we can make use of the self-service portal or the company portal to publish some of the applications for Windows."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"It would be good to have more clarity around licensing."
"The ease of use regarding finding audit information for users could also be improved."
"Microsoft needs to make improvements in this regard and extend its services to other operating systems as well, especially when considering their widespread usage."
"Generally, everything works pretty well, but sometimes, Azure Active Directory has outages on the Microsoft side of things. These outages really have a very big impact on the users, applications, and everything else because they are closely tied to the Azure AD ecosystem. So, whenever there is an outage, it is really difficult because all things start failing. This happens very rarely, but when it happens, there is a big impact."
"We would like to have more granularity in the Azure conditional access in order to be able to manage more groups for devices and for applications."
"The product needs to be more user-friendly."
"The solution could be improved when it comes to monitoring and logging as these are the most critical areas in case something was to go wrong."
"Allowing for more customization would be very useful. There is a limited metadata capability. When you look at a user, there are only six pieces of information you can see, but organizations are way more complex, so having that metadata available and being able to use that for dynamic user groups and other policies would be very helpful."
"Onboarding of endpoint devices is not straightforward. The onboarding process was a little heavier than I thought it would be. That's the key improvement area. Obviously, the more control you have over the devices, the better it is."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"Areas for improvement in Intune include expanding support beyond Samsung devices to accommodate other Android manufacturers like Redmi and Motorola."
"Microsoft Intune could enhance its patch management for various devices, ensuring regular updates and tracking of device privileges."
"They should improve its compatibility with other operating systems such as iOS and Linux. It supports Linux but they still need to work on the iOS part."
"I expect Microsoft Intune to have more features in the cloud because there are two major functionalities that we need to be added. This is software metering and license management. These functionalities, for now, must be on-premise. For this purpose, we have set up a SQL Server and I hope that in near future this option will be in the cloud in Microsoft Intune."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"Could benefit from user having more control over devices."
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 4th in Microsoft Security Suite with 190 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Microsoft Security Suite with 163 reviews. Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Yubico YubiKey, Cisco Duo and Auth0, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and IBM MaaS360. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Microsoft Intune report.
See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.
We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
In recent years Microsoft has really upped its game with Defender and Intune. As core cyber-security for an SME, keeping just to Microsoft is now a real option. The challenge is understanding the gaps / cyber security service weaknesses (if they exist) in comparison with other vendors such as ESET, Malwarebytes, Trend Micro, etc.
Azure AD Services, Defender for Endpoint, and Intune are all Microsoft products, but it is important to understand how each product works as they may not be compatible and there may be some limitations.
Devices managed through Intune may not have all of the Defender for Endpoint features. Some advanced features such as automated investigation and remediation may only be available for devices that are enrolled in Defender for Endpoint standalone.
In addition, Azure AD and Intune have different requirements for device enrollment and management. Intune requires devices to be enrolled and managed through an MDM solution, while Azure AD provides basic device management capabilities but may not support all of the features available in Intune.
Lastly, there may be limitations to how user identities and access are managed between Azure AD and Intune. Some features that are available in Azure AD, such as conditional access policies, may not suit Intune, and additional configuration may be required to ensure that user identities and access are properly managed across both services.
If anyone out there has other experiences, please let me know!
It depends on your company's infrastructure. Check with your cyber team whether you can sync your endpoints to Cloud using Azure AD as Azure Registered/ Azure Hybrid AD join/ Azure AD join, etc.
1. So, if the ask is only to enroll them in Intune to leverage defender/BitLocker services - go directly to Azure AD's join approach.
2. If you still want to manage patch management/mcm BitLocker but Defender via cloud, the approach should be Azure Hybrid AD join.
3. You can still use autopilot using both of these approaches.
I believe it is a good first step, and I would say even a requirement, but in no way is it a comprehensive security solution, even for endpoints.
There are many things that need to be addressed for security. In addition to this, there is XDR, MDR, more comprehensive AV for endpoints & Servers that stop attacks, Threat Hunting, Mitigation, PEN Testing, Security Training for end users, Multi-Factor Authentication (Microsoft's MFA is good but only for Microsoft products), Patch Management for Endpoints, Servers and Cloud Workloads, Network Access Control, Firewalls for On-Premise and Cloud server workloads, Network Segmentation, Password Management, Data Backups (3-2-1-1 Rule) with Immutable Backups, Power Backups, Physical Security, Monitoring, NOC/SOC services, and working towards a Zero Trust architecture...
But there are no single-point solutions that will make you secure, so don't get complacent. And you can outspend your profits if you do everything. Just remember it's best to have a layered approach that works together and looks at everything from a security perspective and how it integrates with your overall security plans and objectives to help identify holes and possible mitigations.
Healthcare must do Risk Assessments by law, but I recommend that all companies of all sizes do at least annual risk assessments since there is so such thing as being too small or inconspicuous to be hit with malware or have a cyber security attack since much of the delivery is automated and not just by the script-kiddies of years gone by... Nation States are actively engaging in cyber warfare daily, along with terrorists, and opportunists looking to make big money from you...