We performed a comparison between Auth0 and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."
"It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features."
"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."
"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."
"The most valuable feature of the product is scalability."
"The most valuable feature is interface application integration, but we haven't fully used it yet. We'll need it in the future for a few potential clients."
"The most important thing for me is compliance. Everything that they have developed in Auth0 is already certified by many regulators such as ISO. So, we do not need to take care of that. We have the shared responsibility model to share assets with other products we are using in the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is the authentication platform."
"The best feature is the single sign-on provision for the various type of users."
"Active Directory itself is the best feature it has. It also gives us a single pane of glass for managing user access."
"Personally, I'm a great fan of Azure Active Directory due to the security and compliance features that are there in the classic or default Azure Active Directory."
"Azure AD has features that have helped improve our security posture."
"It's something we have to deal with every day. It is present. If you're in a domain environment, you'll need it to log in. If you work in a Microsoft-centric environment, you can't avoid it."
"We can centralize and manage everything much more effectively with this tool."
"Technical support has been great."
"When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience."
"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."
"The price modelling is a bit confusing on the site and can be costly."
"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."
"The tool's price should be improved."
"The Management API could be improved so it's easier to get user information."
"The product support for multi-tenancy could be improved."
"I hope, in the roadmap, Microsoft eventually offers the same features as Okta. It will take some more time to mature."
"If any service is down, it can affect a whole region. We would need to wait on a ticket and get word from Microsoft to understand the issues. If it takes longer to resolve the issue on Microsoft's side, all we can do is wait for them to fix it."
"The support could be better. Lately, they sort of dropped off a bit in terms of quality."
"I haven't had any issues with the product."
"I would like to see improvements made when it comes to viewing audit logs, sign-in logs, and resource tags."
"I would like it to be easier to integrate third-party applications."
"The solution can improve the educational portion because it is an administration cost."
"Though the installation was seamless, it took longer than expected to be completed."
Auth0 is ranked 2nd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 7 reviews while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 101 reviews. Auth0 is rated 8.4, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Auth0 writes "Very easy to set up new SAML and SSO integrations with support for all IDPs including Okta and Azure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Provides a secure environment to easily manage users and assign roles and permissions". Auth0 is most compared with Frontegg, Amazon Cognito, Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity and ForgeRock, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, PingFederate, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Okta Workforce Identity. See our Auth0 vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.