"This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us."
"Integrates well with other products."
"The cost is the most important factor in this tool."
"It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The most valuable features are the object repository."
"The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application."
"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."
"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."
"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."
"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is the Tosca Commander. Functionality is another thing I find most valuable in the solution."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"The solution has plenty of features compared to other solutions."
"The automation engine is very strong, and it is very competitive in the market in terms of features. They develop a lot of features."
"UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise."
"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."
"In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable."
"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure."
"With Smart Bear products generally, you can have only one instance of the tool running on a machine."
"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."
"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."
"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."
"The solution is expensive."
"The user management could improve in Tricentis Tosca because it is confusing. It would be better to have it in one place. Having to add it to the cloud and to a specific project can be a mess."
"I would like to see more implementation of AI on the self-healing aspect. That would be like the next step."
"The integration with mobile testing could be useful."
"Tosca's reporting features could be better. Tricentis had a reporting tool called Analytics, but it didn't function properly after they reworked it. After that, they tried a new approach with key-tracing, and that didn't work."
Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 10th in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 26 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 7.4, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Efficient operations, continuous improvements, and robust features". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ, Visual Studio Test Professional, Silk Test and froglogic Squish, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Worksoft Certify, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Selenium HQ. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
