Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, Perforce and others in Performance Testing Tools.
I have seen an ROI from this tool, as it provides enormous value.
The technical support experience is a bit limited due to this indirect relationship.
The customer service and technical support for OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is reasonable, not impressive, but provides adequate assistance.
Sometimes, the documentation is not readable, being too long or too detailed and not connected to my problem.
I rate the scalability of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) as ten when using a scale from one to ten, with one being low.
However, it remains quite stable.
It could be much better, especially with modern AI capabilities.
Additionally, in Visual Studio Code, we have an agent mode for GitHub Copilot, which is very helpful in testing or development phases, while Visual Studio's GitHub Copilot is a bit tricky and sometimes does not provide my desired output.
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface.
Sometimes, the library version is not compatible with other libraries, causing errors in my application.
When discussing price, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) is very expensive, which I would represent by a rating of ten.
It is neither cheap nor expensive.
The price is expensive.
The scalable testing environment is very beneficial for my performance testing processes.
The best features of this solution are easy scripting and broad platform support.
Visual Studio Test Professional is highly valuable because it provides extensive extensions and plugins that assist in measuring code quality.
We have a retrospective in our auto projects that we are using frequently to get lessons learned, what went well, and what is going wrong.
It supports cross-platform functionality.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) | 6.2% |
| Apache JMeter | 12.8% |
| OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) | 12.1% |
| Other | 68.9% |
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Visual Studio Test Professional | 1.2% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 14.2% |
| BrowserStack | 8.1% |
| Other | 76.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) provides robust performance testing capabilities with scalable and user-friendly tools. It supports multiple protocols for diverse applications, ensuring reliable and comprehensive performance metrics for organizations.
Designed for extensive performance testing, OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering offers advanced integration features and global testing capabilities. Users value its ease of scheduling, detailed analysis, and efficient resource management. It simulates real-world scenarios to deliver valuable metrics across industries. Its intuitive interface, while needing smoother navigation, aligns with its flexibility and versatility. Enhanced reporting and cloud-based integration, especially with AWS, are potential growth areas alongside improved third-party tool integration and technical support.
What are the key features of OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering?OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering is implemented in banking, healthcare, and retail industries, assisting in load, stress, and performance testing. Organizations utilize its capabilities for validating web, API, cloud, ERP, and Citrix applications, ensuring reliability with comprehensive metrics for large-scale user handling.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
