OpenText Data Protector vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

The compared OpenText and Broadcom solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #22 in BRS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 0.6% mindshare in the category. Broadcom is ranked #3 in DLP , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,381 Views
837 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Read 59 Symantec Data Loss Prevention reviews

3,825 Views
2,519 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Data Protector and Symantec Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: May 2019).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

May 2019

Download the complete report

Helped 850,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (22nd)

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Data Protector and Symantec Data Loss Prevention aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Data Protector is designed for Backup and Recovery and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, down 0.7% compared to last year.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Data Loss Prevention (DLP), holds 6.7% mindshare, down 10.7% since last year.

Backup and Recovery

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

ARAVINDAN K

Information Security Engineer 4 at Amadeus

Strengthened security operations with endpoint-level protection but database flexibility could improve

Symantec Data Loss Prevention has proprietary metadata and is well-suited for endpoint-level security. It stands out for supporting multiple protocols like email and SMTP without needing user profile login for endpoint agents. Once policies are downloaded to the local system, they function independently of a user's login. The solution helps enhance security operations when integrated with ServiceNow and offers robust incident response capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."

"Integration with HP storage is a very strong point for Micro Focus Data Protector. It is the best solution for general operations like backup and restore. Zero downtime backup (ZDB) is one very important feature, which is basically the integration with the storage array. It is a very strong feature. We're using storage with snapshots with this integration."

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."

"The solution is easy to use."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"The exfiltration capabilities are great. You can put all of these rules in the product to detect the patterns and text."

"The synchronize application detection policies have been very good."

"What I like about Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the technical support it provides. It's good."

"The incident response capability has been instrumental in mitigating potential data loss."

"The most valuable feature of Symantec Data Loss Prevention is the ease of modification."

"The tool's really working well, and the agents are good."

"The most valuable aspect of Symantec DLP is its broad coverage. Symantec DLP covers USB, Outlook email clients, and web traffic. If we install the endpoint DLP, we can cover multiple channels, including the clipboard and printer."

"The incident response options and reporting features are particularly strong, with the inclusion of Incident Classification Assessment (ICA) for integrated reporting."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."

"Virtualization."

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"The online backups of Office 365 have room for improvement. This is now available for the Exchange Online part of Office 365, but we're still waiting for SharePoint Online, Teams, etc. We know that it's coming, but it takes time."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"What could be improved in Symantec Data Loss Prevention is its security. It should be more secure."

"There is room for improvement in the remote control capabilities of the DLP solution."

"DLP could be improved by implementing a cloud-based console."

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention could improve by having better system resource management, cloud option, and more features."

"The solution is not user-friendly."

"I would like to see an improved interface, with better documentation and integration with other products."

"Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup needs to be easier and support needs to be improved."

"Updates sometimes overlap, causing technical errors."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP offers reasonable rates compared to other products like Forcepoint or Jargill, making it a good investment for ROI, typically seen within two years."

"DLP could be a bit cheaper."

"There is an annual license required to use this solution."

"The price is a bit high."

"The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."

"The product charges a little on the higher side."

"Pricing is above average."

"The platform is expensive."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

It can prevent copying and encoding of HTTP data to various sites like Google, and Webex.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

I do not have an idea about pricing, as it is handled by another team responsible for procurements.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Data Loss Prevention?

A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle, especially compared to other products like Forcepoint, which offer MSSQL database options that are more convenient.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 65% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 37% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 19% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 9% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

April 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

April 2025

Download Symantec Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Symantec DLP

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

Broadcom

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

May 2019

Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.