Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.5, while Trellix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8. Palo Alto Networks holds a 5.6% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Read 29 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews
  • 3,150 Views
  • 2,426 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 15 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 1,067 Views
  • 928 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System compete in the cybersecurity market. Palo Alto appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, ease of management, and robust cloud options, despite Trellix's competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Palo Alto Networks offers a next-generation firewall with machine learning for threat detection, WildFire for advanced sandboxing, and strong URL filtering. Trellix focuses on real-time threat intelligence, efficient DDoS attack management, and stable performance supported by automated signature updates.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could improve its initial setup complexity, resource consumption, and expand protocol integrations. Users also suggest enhancements in email protection and pricing. Trellix's management interface needs simplification, along with better detection capabilities and improved documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer primarily on-premises deployments, with Palo Alto providing more cloud deployment options. Palo Alto generally has better-rated customer support, though some users express concerns about local support quality. Trellix is praised for good support but criticized for complex console navigation and limited support resources in certain regions.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto is perceived as expensive, particularly in smaller markets, but its advanced features justify the cost for many and offer strong ROI due to comprehensive security functionalities. Trellix, offering competitive pricing and no licensing fees, appeals to budget-conscious buyers and provides value through its effectiveness and cost structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 5.6%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention5.6%
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System2.7%
Other91.7%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Partha Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced protection enables us to confidently secure against evolving threats
Palo Alto Networks can improve Advanced Threat Prevention by catering to the growing adoption of AI and agentic tooling. The Threat Protection modules should have the necessary intelligence to protect against those types of threats, as AI will be there to do a human job; this is an evolving area. From an Advanced Threat Protection perspective, the technology associated with Palo Alto Networks, such as their sandboxing environment, is quite good. However, Palo Alto needs to focus on how to bring that technology to end users and how easy it is to use, especially in a hybrid environment where users work from various locations. While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions.
Read full review
Daniel_Martins - PeerSpot reviewer
Decade of experience empowers seamless problem resolution and support
I haven't seen threat intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis in the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System yet. For Trellix IPS, AI improvements are an area where it can improve. It's a significant feature. Regarding the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System's flexibility for catering to our organization's specific infrastructure requirements, we have only on-premises and virtual appliances, but it's acceptable. The access and platform could potentially integrate with SaaS. Similar to when you put the EPO in mode integration with SaaS, you can connect with a local credential and with an X Console credential. Another possibility would be to connect with an integration login with the X Console. We have this with EPO on-premise, but with IPS, we don't have it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."
"It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked."
"The user interface is a bit more professional than some free products."
"The stability of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is good."
"The most valuable feature is its use of machine learning to detect potentially unknown threats."
"The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds."
"I find the malware protection very handy."
"The application control and vulnerability protection are the most valuable features."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros
"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of signatures in IPS."
"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."
"The solution can scale."
"Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Right now we are focusing on email. If Palo Alto can increase the features related to email filtering and the new malware, it would help us protect our systems."
"The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution."
"The application’s pricing and dashboard need improvement. It could be user-friendly."
"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."
"Sometimes when you want to group a set of ports, and communicate with Palo Alto, you cannot group TCP and UDP ports together. This needs to be adjusted."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons
"The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The solution could improve some aspects of detection."
"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."
"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."
"The solution needs to improve the graphical interface. And they had a limitation in some of the sensor modems as well."
"The pricing could be improved."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."
"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."
"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."
"It's not too expensive."
"From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice
"The tool is competitively priced."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
It is a stable product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) fi...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
I haven't seen threat intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis in the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System yet. For Trellix IPS, AI improvements are an area where it can impr...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 14% of the time
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 13% of the time
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 11% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 5% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 32% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 20% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 13% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 9% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 8% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
August 2025
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
August 2025
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
September 2025
Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.