Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.3, while Trellix is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.2. Palo Alto Networks holds a 5.7% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Read 29 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews
  • 2,983 Views
  • 2,297 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 16 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 1,066 Views
  • 938 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System compete in the cybersecurity market. Palo Alto appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, ease of management, and robust cloud options, despite Trellix's competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Features: Palo Alto Networks offers a next-generation firewall with machine learning for threat detection, WildFire for advanced sandboxing, and strong URL filtering. Trellix focuses on real-time threat intelligence, efficient DDoS attack management, and stable performance supported by automated signature updates.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could improve its initial setup complexity, resource consumption, and expand protocol integrations. Users also suggest enhancements in email protection and pricing. Trellix's management interface needs simplification, along with better detection capabilities and improved documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer primarily on-premises deployments, with Palo Alto providing more cloud deployment options. Palo Alto generally has better-rated customer support, though some users express concerns about local support quality. Trellix is praised for good support but criticized for complex console navigation and limited support resources in certain regions.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto is perceived as expensive, particularly in smaller markets, but its advanced features justify the cost for many and offer strong ROI due to comprehensive security functionalities. Trellix, offering competitive pricing and no licensing fees, appeals to budget-conscious buyers and provides value through its effectiveness and cost structure.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: November 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
November 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is 5.7%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention5.7%
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System2.6%
Other91.7%
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Partha Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Advanced protection enables us to confidently secure against evolving threats
Palo Alto Networks can improve Advanced Threat Prevention by catering to the growing adoption of AI and agentic tooling. The Threat Protection modules should have the necessary intelligence to protect against those types of threats, as AI will be there to do a human job; this is an evolving area. From an Advanced Threat Protection perspective, the technology associated with Palo Alto Networks, such as their sandboxing environment, is quite good. However, Palo Alto needs to focus on how to bring that technology to end users and how easy it is to use, especially in a hybrid environment where users work from various locations. While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions.
Read full review
Daniel_Martins - PeerSpot reviewer
Decade of experience empowers seamless problem resolution and support
I haven't seen threat intelligence and machine learning for predictive threat analysis in the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System yet. For Trellix IPS, AI improvements are an area where it can improve. It's a significant feature. Regarding the Trellix Intrusion Prevention System's flexibility for catering to our organization's specific infrastructure requirements, we have only on-premises and virtual appliances, but it's acceptable. The access and platform could potentially integrate with SaaS. Similar to when you put the EPO in mode integration with SaaS, you can connect with a local credential and with an X Console credential. Another possibility would be to connect with an integration login with the X Console. We have this with EPO on-premise, but with IPS, we don't have it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With the IP address flag, I was able to see that I was being hacked. The moment there was an interaction between somebody on my network and that IP, the solution was able to flag it, and we were able to protect ourselves."
"The most valuable features are the simplicity, transparency, and overall ease of management."
"The initial setup was straightforward. It's quite easy. Deployment took one to two weeks."
"It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the market leader as far as security gateways and endpoint protection. Additionally, the threat database that is used is one of the best."
"It is a stable product."
"I rate Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention as nine out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is its use of machine learning to detect potentially unknown threats."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."
"The product is worth the investment."
"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."
"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."
"The most valuable features in Trellix for me are the automated signature updates. It is a great and convenient feature."
"The solution can scale."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is a good product for dealing with DDoS attacks and for the inspection of network traffic."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."
"The documentation needs to be improved. I need better information about how to configure it and what the best practices are."
"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved."
"There is a potential drawback with the lack of support for the ICAP protocol."
"It's not so easy to set up a test environment, because it's not so easy to get the test license. The vendor only gives you 90 days for a test license; it's a tough license to get."
"Generally, to deploy it will take some downtime, about a day."
"While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions."
"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons
"The Network Security Managers could be more stable, agile, and work faster. When it comes to instability, there is room for improvement."
"The management component could be simplified."
"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."
"Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching."
"The technical support must be improved."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The pricing could be improved."
"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower."
"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."
"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels."
"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."
"It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price."
"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."
"There is an initial, expensive investment but the return is good."
"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice
"The tool is competitively priced."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?
Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
It is a stable product.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) fi...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching. Patching involves updates on the OS side to address vulnerabilities, which is a different functionality. Trellix Intrusion Pre...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 12% of the time
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 10% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Check Point IPS vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 9% of the time
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Logo
Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
Compared 5% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 28% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 18% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 17% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 9% of the time
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Check Point IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 7% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention
October 2025
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
October 2025
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys widespread adoption across diverse organizations. With its robust security capabilities, it's an ideal choice for entities of all sizes, particularly those in high-risk sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies, seeking to safeguard their networks from a broad spectrum of advanced threats.

Palo Alto Networks

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
November 2025
Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.