No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Marqo Agentic Search & Product Discovery vs Qdrant comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 13, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Marqo Agentic Search & Prod...
Ranking in Vector Databases
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Search as a Service (16th)
Qdrant
Ranking in Vector Databases
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (5th), AI Data Analysis (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Marqo Agentic Search & Product Discovery is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qdrant is 6.3%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qdrant6.3%
Marqo Agentic Search & Product Discovery1.4%
Other92.3%
Vector Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Use Marqo Agentic Search & Product Discovery?
Leave a review
Pawel Cislo - PeerSpot reviewer
MLOps Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Adaptive assistant has delivered faster grounded answers and has reduced token costs significantly
The main limitations I notice come down to developer experience and native features rather than performance. Building hybrid retrieval and fusion pipelines still requires considerable manual orchestration and code. Having more built-in multi-query fusion strategies natively inside Qdrant would be a significant time-saver. Additionally, managing dynamic metadata schemas and tracking index build progress during bulk ingest could be more transparent in the web UI. To make things easier for developers, Qdrant could provide more native tools for managing payload schema evolution over time. As metadata needs change in production RAG systems, updating existing payloads across large collections currently requires custom migration scripts. Built-in schema versioning and simpler automated index testing during CI/CD would make running Qdrant in rapidly evolving production environments even smoother. I rate Qdrant 9 out of 10 because its speed, sub-15 millisecond retrieval, and single-stage payload filtering make it top-tier for production RAG pipelines. I deduct one point mainly for developer experience. Setting up multi-query fusion still requires extra boilerplate code, payload metadata schema updates require custom migration scripts, and real-time visibility into HNSW graph indexing progress during bulk ingest could be improved in the web UI.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qdrant?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Qdrant is that it is quite straightforward.
What needs improvement with Qdrant?
Qdrant is available through a containerized Docker, but a normal deployment in Qdrant is not there, and that can actually be worked out. That was one aspect I thought about, because I need to have ...
What is your primary use case for Qdrant?
We have a full-fledged RAG system using Qdrant Vector Database, and that is how it has benefited us. For example, we have implemented a techno-commercial evaluator using that, and it is in producti...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. BMW 5. Cisco 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. Disney 9. Google 10.HP 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Heinz 15. L'Oreal 16. McDonalds 17. Merck 18.Microsoft 19.Nike 20.Oracle 21.PG 22. PepsiCo 23.Procter and Gamble 24.Samsung 25. Shell  26.Sony 27. Toyota 28.Visa 29.Walmart 30.WeWork
1. Airbnb 2. Amazon 3. Apple 4. BMW 5.Cisco 6. CocaCola 7. Dell 8. Disney 9. Google 10. HP 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Heinz 15. L'Oreal 16. McDonalds 17. Merck 18. Microsoft 19. Nike20. Oracle 21. PG 22. PepsiCo 23. Procter and Gamble 24. Samsung 25. Shell 26. Sony 27. Toyota 28. Visa 29. Walmart 30. WeWork
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Qdrant, Supabase and others in Vector Databases. Updated: August 2026.
912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.