LogMeIn Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared GoTo and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. GoTo is ranked #13 in RMM , and holds a 3.9% mindshare in the category. Microsoft is ranked #5 in SM , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

LogMeIn Central

Read 19 LogMeIn Central reviews

2,522 Views
1,967 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 86 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

18,118 Views
3,624 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

LogMeIn Central

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between LogMeIn Central and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, datto and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM).

To learn more, read our detailed Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogMeIn Central

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (13th)

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (2nd), Server Monitoring (5th), Configuration Management (4th), Patch Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Systems Management solutions, they serve different purposes. LogMeIn Central is designed for Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) and holds a mindshare of 3.9%, up 3.2% compared to last year.
Microsoft Configuration Manager, on the other hand, focuses on Server Monitoring, holds 4.0% mindshare, up 3.6% since last year.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
LogMeIn Central	3.9%
Kaseya VSA	9.7%
NinjaOne	9.4%
Other	77.0%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Server Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager	4.0%
Zabbix	10.0%
Nagios XI	6.3%
Other	79.7%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer1191933

Associate Director of Information Technology at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Scalable, good search features, and good options for multiple displays

I like the options for multiple displays. The unattended access is very useful, but it can also be misused. So, it is something you have to be careful with. The search features are really nice. When you type in a keyword, every single thing, whether it's a group or a machine, with that phrase will come up. There are a lot of features that we just don't utilize and maybe we could, but we're pretty straightforward about it. It is nice to use the file transfer feature from time to time, and it is really nice to be able to just copy from your desktop and paste onto the LogMeIn session.

Read full review

Narendar S

Senior System Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized endpoint control has streamlined deployments and improved security compliance

In my experience, the best features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are software deployments and updates, OSD, hardware and software inventory, compliance and configuration baseline, reporting and monitoring, and integration with Intune hybrid management. These features make endpoint management efficient and scalable. The feature I rely on the most day-to-day is software deployment and patch management. It keeps endpoints updated and secure with minimal manual effort. Inventory and compliance monitoring are also important, but daily deployments are critical. Microsoft Configuration Manager has had a significant positive impact on our organization in several ways: improved efficiency, enhanced security and compliance, standardization, scalability, and visibility reporting. Overall, Microsoft Configuration Manager has helped us save time, reduce risk, improve operational efficiency, and maintain strong control over our endpoints. One of the biggest impacts Microsoft Configuration Manager has had on efficiency is the reduced manual work for software deployment and patching. For example, deploying a new application or security updates to hundreds or thousands of devices previously required several days of manual effort, including running scripts, checking devices individually, and validating installation. With Microsoft Configuration Manager, these tasks are automated and managed, allowing deployments to complete in hours rather than days. We also have automated reporting for deployment success and compliance which saved the IT team significant time that used to be spent gathering and reconciling inventory data from multiple tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Remote access is really the biggest one, because in order to be able to support my clients from wherever I am, that is the biggest feature."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"I like the security aspect, that I can glance down and see quickly who's up to date on patches, and who has virus concerns."

"Remote access, we can remote access our clients, the workstation servers."

"I function through LogMeIn, because it gives me everything I need."

"The ability to manipulate and do things to the computer and file manager, then boot to safe mode, and see what is going on and track alerts. I use it all."

"The biggest improvement is being able to solve problems or do upgrades of software without having to go onsite."

"This solution has allowed granular permission access to machines, very consistent and solid most of the time."

More LogMeIn Central pros

"Using SCCM has sped up PC deployment, made it much more consistent through automation, and provided a self-service application portal that users can go to and install software themselves without admin rights."

"This solution captures all the devices in our infrastructure."

"The support from Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is good, they are friendly."

"Because it's console-based we can create one application or patch in the console, it will download, and from the console base we can deploy to all machines."

"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."

"I would tell potential users that for 15,000 or 30,000 machines, you must go with Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager as it's the best tool."

"Offers good patching."

"The product is very stable compared to older versions."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

Cons

"The price. I complain about it all the time."

"Cost. It's probably worth the value, but the price increases over the last five years are getting harder to justify."

"Our clients are having issues with printing."

"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."

"The price needs improvement. It is ridiculously expensive now, and no features have really changed."

"The only thing I found is that they've gotten very, very expensive over the years."

"It needs backwards compatibility for non-Microsoft-supported operating systems, for example, XP and 2003. In situations where I have no options but to run older operating systems, I would like for it to be backwards compatible."

"It is easy to get locked out, which is something that needs to be improved."

More LogMeIn Central cons

"There's no way to say, "I want this maintenance window to be on the second Tuesday of the month." It's strict. This window is this and that's it. You can't fluctuate."

"On some hardware, we'd like an easier way to get peripherals attached."

"I think SCCM can improve whatever details they shared with the integration partner. There was a lot of junk software and data."

"The solution can be improved with the addition of a mobile device manager."

"Its dashboard can be improved and made a little bit better."

"It has a very sensitive database and it almost always crashes when we use it, especially if you don't take care of it."

"They should improve their anti-malware policies like the SCEP policies. For instance, you can't have different policies for different servers, there is only one policy in all the servers, and everything is covered under that. For example, say you want to scan one group of servers on Saturday, and then you want to scan another group of servers on Sunday, you can't do that. You have to scan all your servers, a regular scan or a full scan, on the same day and at the same time. That's definitely one thing they need to resolve. In the next release, it would actually be nice if they included Apple products. It will also help if you can use Intune again. Their compliance reporting feature could also be better. They can maybe work a bit on that for patching now. It would be better if SCCM came with the functions of Right Click Tools built-in. If SCCM would have all those functions already built-in, we won't have to go and spend $5,000, just as an add-in from another company to get those functions."

"Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I complain about the price all the time. It's gone up from relatively inexpensively to, right now, about $2000 a year for me, based upon the number of machines I have. You say $2000 is not that bad, but the price has jumped up significantly over the past few years. They went three or four years without any price increases, and then they did a dramatic increase, three or four times the annual fee, two years in a row. But last year and this year it has been pretty stable."

"We are an educational institution, so anything to make it cheaper would be better because we don’t grow money on trees."

"Coming from where it was free, it's getting to be expensive."

"Pricing is a little high. They require for LogMeIn Central to go into brackets. If you go over a certain amount of PCs or servers to access, going up to the next bracket is a big jump."

"The price is a little high but it's competitive. The licensing process is fairly easy."

"The price needs improvement. It is ridiculously expensive now, and no features have really changed."

"Having to spend so much money on remote access is what I feel to be a necessary evil."

"We've been trying to nail its cost down ourselves, and it is a disaster in that area because you get different numbers all the time. They say this is what it is, but the numbers don't make a lot of sense to me. I know that the numbers change. So, the more you have, the less they are per seat, but I don't really understand where those breakdowns are. Its billing is confusing. It is definitely the worst part. For 7,500 seats, it might be between 2,250 and 2,700 a month. It is somewhere in there."

More LogMeIn Central pricing and cost advice

"Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works."

"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."

"Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing."

"I rate the price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager an eight out of ten."

"The solution is expensive. Microsoft Configuration Manager would likely be considered high-priced for small businesses because they may not fully utilize all of its features and capabilities."

"There is not a license needed to use the solution."

"We have to pay for a license."

"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCCM?

The setup cost is considered sufficient. It is not significant enough for us to consider a change at the moment.

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 13% of the time

TeamViewer vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 12% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 9% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 7% of the time

N-able N-central vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 5% of the time

More LogMeIn Central Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 3% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 3% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central

October 2026

Download LogMeIn Central product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

October 2026

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

Overview

LogMeIn Central provides remote access, unattended remote assistance, and file transfer features. It supports tasks like system management without user intervention and is favored for its speed, security, and remote control capabilities.

LogMeIn Central is designed for organizations requiring efficient IT management and robust remote support. It enables access to servers, desktops, and laptops, assisting remote employees in maintaining connectivity. Tasks such as system updates, backups, network configurations, and security management are seamlessly executed, ensuring operational efficiency and secure client system administration. Users benefit from managing endpoints and maintaining consistent connectivity across locations. Challenges remain with screen clarity, pricing, and browser updates, while enhancements are desired for file transfer intuitiveness, API robustness, and web functionality. Customer service responsiveness and billing clarity are noted areas for improvement.

What are the main features of LogMeIn Central?

Remote Access: Provides secure control of devices from afar.
Unattended Remote Assistance: Allows intervention without user presence.
File Transfer: Supports transferring files across devices.
Multiple Displays: Facilitates remote management of multiple screens.
Keyword Search: Enhances system management efficiency.
Granular Permissions: Organizes access for efficiency with multiple clients.

What benefits should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines remote IT tasks and support.
Enhanced Security: Protects data and maintains secure connections.
Time Management: Enables system updates during non-working hours.
Versatile Support: Adapts to a diverse range of client systems.

In specific industries such as non-profits and educational institutions, LogMeIn Central plays a crucial role in managing technology infrastructure across campuses or locations. Despite cost concerns, it remains a preferred tool for IT professionals handling numerous endpoints, enhancing productivity while maintaining budgetary constraints.

GoTo

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Au Bon Pain, BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life)

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, datto and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.