

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
In 24 months, after you've deployed the tool and you've got a lot of good validated data, you're probably looking at consolidating and saving your organization ongoing savings that is equatable to how much the tool would cost you on a yearly basis.
The ROI is seen more on the optimization side and the ability to map applications comprehensively rather than direct cost savings.
It saves money, time, and requires fewer people for a project because one person can handle everything, deploying using a single command, with testing and running all managed seamlessly without needing multiple people for various purposes.
By reducing our monthly infrastructure spend by about 30%, we eliminated the idle capacity costs we were previously paying for underutilized EC2 instances.
We handle deployment more than 80 percent faster, so we do not need to have a specialized DevOps engineer as my full-stack skills cover it.
The support includes engagement from Technical Advisable Management, who helps us understand and utilize new product features effectively.
Sometimes the challenges with the first level that you actually speak to, they don't understand the problem.
For support, I'll probably give them a seven.
We tried to reach out for some issues and received quick responses.
Whenever we reach out to them, they quickly reply to us.
When issues arise, I rely on AWS for detailed insights, but the lack of direct access can be limiting.
I've never seen any issues with being able to scale up or scale down the capabilities of the solution at all.
For instance, when I launch an app using Serverless and the load increases, the necessary CPU and RAM scale automatically without requiring any additional configuration from me.
It allows users to run multiple requests at the same time and is able to handle even thousands of requests concurrently.
Serverless automatically handles large requests coming to any Lambda and will automatically scale.
We've had issues where we've had to go back to SAP and ask for help with issues that we've had with core capabilities that were supposed to be there but weren't working.
With five years of experience using Serverless services from AWS, I have encountered no outages or issues.
Serverless is stable and very responsive.
We have seen significantly higher uptime compared to our previous setup because the platform handles all the underlying patching and scaling automatically.
They should implement their ticketing system natively within the application instead of relying on email.
A default framework would provide a base that organizations can quickly adopt and customize, reducing the time and effort spent on adoption.
The challenge with support was probably the response time.
It cannot run long-running processes, which keeps it from being a perfect ten.
Beyond latency, I believe better observability and debugging tools for distributed Serverless architecture are critical.
Probably it would have an integration with something like Terraform or another alternative.
It cost me $91,000 a year for 300 applications.
Our usage and costs depend on the number of applications, and as the number of applications grows, so does the cost.
I recently feel the licensing is a bit expensive.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I find the pricing model quite efficient for us, as we only pay for execution time in a pay-per-use model, eliminating the idle costs we saw with traditional servers.
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing experience, I find the application to be very cost-effective.
It ensures cost optimization by identifying duplicate applications and stopping unnecessary application onboarding.
Being able to do the lineage all the way through so that each one of those you can pull them out into their component parts to determine exactly which areas you need to resolve, fix, plan, or build a strategy around.
When you align it or map it to your business capabilities, this is how you identify duplication of technologies in your business.
Serverless integrates with my existing tech stack and other tools seamlessly; it works flawlessly and is a service of its own, so it does not really affect anything else.
Serverless improves the release speed and deployment speed significantly compared to earlier when we used to deploy using Lambda SAM, reducing deployment time and becoming less error-prone, making it very useful.
If you want to scale up, then Serverless is the best way. It is scalable and more secure, and it is on-demand, so it is easy to reduce or increase the load based on our needs.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| LeanIX | 7.7% |
| Serverless | 0.3% |
| Other | 92.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
LeanIX offers enterprise architecture solutions to drive IT modernization and continuous business transformation. It empowers organizations to visualize, evaluate, and evolve their architecture for maximum impact.
Known globally, LeanIX provides AI-enhanced SaaS solutions for enterprises, enabling the visualization and evolution of enterprise architecture. From optimizing current IT landscapes to designing future ones, LeanIX equips organizations with necessary insights and flexibility. Its solutions include Application Portfolio Management for an overview of IT and business capabilities, Technology Risk and Compliance for addressing technology obsolescence, and Architecture and Road Map Planning for defining target architectures.
What are the key features of LeanIX?LeanIX is widely adopted for application portfolio management and rationalization, primarily by organizations seeking to inventory and assess applications. It facilitates the development of business capability models and aligns technology with business needs, aiding in strategic decisions. Teams use it to optimize IT landscapes, manage cloud governance, and link technology with business capabilities effectively across industries.
Serverless revolutionizes application architecture by eliminating the need for server management, offering a scalable, cost-efficient approach for modern development needs. It enables developers to focus on writing code without the complexities of infrastructure handling.
Originally designed for enhancing agility, Serverless provides on-demand function execution, ensuring seamless scalability and rapid deployment. As a back-end architecture, it allows businesses to execute code in response to events and automatically manage the required resources, optimizing resource usage and minimizing idle capacity. This approach abstracts server provisioning, allowing developers to streamline workflow and focus on creating innovative solutions without dealing with infrastructure concerns.
What are Serverless's key features?Serverless finds application across industries such as e-commerce, where it handles app backends, and finance, for managing real-time data processing tasks. Its flexibility supports a diverse range of enterprise needs, including automated data collection in retail and transaction processing in banking.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.