Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Oracle API Management comparison

Kong and Oracle are both solutions in the API Management category. Kong is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while Oracle is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Kong holds a 7.2% mindshare in APIM, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Kong users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Kong Gateway Enterprise
Read 25 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews
  • 7,416 Views
  • 5,455 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
Oracle API Management
Read 5 Oracle API Management reviews
  • 469 Views
  • 313 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Oracle API Management and Kong Gateway Enterprise are competing in the API management space. Kong Gateway Enterprise seems to have the upper hand due to its focus on scalability and flexibility, making it appealing for businesses that require microservices architecture support.

Features: Oracle API Management offers robust integration with Oracle's ecosystem, advanced security features, and centralized governance. It is especially valuable for companies within the Oracle ecosystem. Kong Gateway Enterprise features a lightweight, scalable platform, extensive plugin support, and real-time traffic visibility. Its modular architecture facilitates ease of customization, which is advantageous for handling microservices efficiently.

Room for Improvement: Oracle API Management can improve by enhancing its support for cloud-native environments, offering more community-driven resources, and providing a more flexible pricing model. Kong Gateway Enterprise could benefit from improving its out-of-the-box security features, refining user interface intuitiveness, and expanding its enterprise-level support options for non-community users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle API Management benefits from tight integration with Oracle services, simplifying deployment for enterprises using Oracle solutions. However, Kong Gateway Enterprise's deployment in cloud-native environments is straightforward, supported by a broad community and detailed documentation, providing a smoother setup. Customer support for Oracle is typically more accessible for existing Oracle clients, while Kong offers extensive community-driven support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle API Management typically incurs higher setup costs that correlate with its comprehensive feature set, yielding substantial ROI for enterprises leveraging Oracle's full suite. Conversely, Kong Gateway Enterprise offers a competitive pricing model that appeals to businesses seeking flexible spending and faster ROI due to its low overhead and operational efficiency. Oracle's cost structure tends to suit large enterprises, whereas Kong presents a more appealing financial model for companies emphasizing agility and cost-effectiveness.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Oracle API Management Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Oracle API Management
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kong Gateway Enterprise
Ranking in API Management
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle API Management
Ranking in API Management
22nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 7.2%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle API Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

ASHOK YADAV - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions but lacks software upgrades
Upgrading Kong Gateway Enterprise should be more sophisticated and innovative. The main issue is with the update process. Our DevOps and admin teams need to update multiple files, which is cumbersome. For instance, in cases where Palantir countries are involved, they have to update many files, which is not ideal. However, for other tasks like configuring the message routing and services and handling all the configurations, the process is acceptable. The software version upgrade process should be improved. Additionally, the DevOps portal should be integrated more natively. There are a few other areas for improvement, such as implementing automatic load balancing. The status of the office team, whether it is up or down, should be checked at the API gateway level to facilitate load balancing.
Read full review
Sagar SampadMall - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure
My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it seamlessly supports a vast number of tools."
"We use the solution for load-balancing, caching, and rate-limiting APIs."
"Kong's most valuable features are its lightweight performance when handling millions of requests and the ability to write custom plugins to enhance security, such as end-to-end encryption, even in the open-source version."
"The route limiting feature is very valuable."
"The most valuable features of Kong Enterprise are the out-of-the-box open source easy functionality."
"It boasts remarkable speed and stability, and these qualities, particularly the gateway's resilience, are standout features for me."
"This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution."
"In our buying companies' perspective, it was easier to use compared to other platforms. The markets were pretty familiar with the solutions."
More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros
"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."
"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."
"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."
"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."
 

Cons

"The technical support team's response time needs to be improved."
"The tool needs improvement in UX."
"Kong Enterprise fails to provide live tracing of the APIs, which is possible nowadays."
"It becomes difficult if you try to scale it up to multiple clusters."
"Kong Enterprise can improve the customization to be able to do the integration properly."
"The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful."
"Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons
"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."
"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."
"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."
"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."
"The licensing is expensive."
"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."
"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."
"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."
"The licensing fees are paid yearly."
"The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."
"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."
More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice
"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Insurance Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?
The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Kong Enterprise?
The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?
More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle API Management?
It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Management?
We opted for a five-year license. It's mid-range, not too high. More affordable than many other options. It's already more affordable than others, especially for small companies it is accommodating...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle API Management?
My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approac...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 13% of the time
Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 11% of the time
Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Kong Konnect vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 10% of the time
Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo
Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise
Compared 10% of the time
More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors
Apigee vs Oracle API Management Logo
Apigee vs Oracle API Management
Compared 49% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management
Compared 19% of the time
IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management Logo
IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management
Compared 18% of the time
WSO2 API Manager vs Oracle API Management Logo
WSO2 API Manager vs Oracle API Management
Compared 15% of the time
More Oracle API Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Kong Gateway Enterprise
June 2025
Kong Gateway Enterprise reportDownload Kong Gateway Enterprise product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle API Management
June 2025
Oracle API Management reportDownload Oracle API Management product report
 

Overview

Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

Kong

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Oracle API Management
June 2025
Free Report: Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Oracle API Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Kong Gateway Enterprise vs. Oracle API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.