Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the API Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9, while Oracle is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 16.5% mindshare in APIM, compared to Oracle’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure API Management

Read 82 Microsoft Azure API Management reviews

18,017 Views
18,017 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle API Management

Read 5 Oracle API Management reviews

487 Views
472 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure API Management

Oracle API Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure API Management and Oracle API Management are competitive solutions in API management. Oracle API Management has an edge in feature set and capability, while Microsoft Azure API Management is more cost-effective and enjoys higher customer satisfaction.

Features: Microsoft Azure API Management includes a developer portal, advanced security protocols, and integration with Azure Active Directory. Oracle API Management offers automated API discovery, integrated SOA governance, and comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure API Management could improve in deep integration with non-Microsoft products, complex API policy management, and greater support for hybrid environments. Oracle API Management may need simpler configuration processes, enhanced user management features, and more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure API Management is favored for its easy deployment and strong support from Microsoft's network. Oracle API Management, although more complex to deploy, provides extensive documentation and dedicated support, making it reliable for large-scale implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure API Management offers attractive usage-based pricing and lower setup costs, making it ideal for small to medium deployments. Oracle API Management, though more expensive initially, provides substantial value for larger projects due to its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure API Management

Ranking in API Management

1st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle API Management

Ranking in API Management

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure API Management is 16.5%, down from 19.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle API Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure API Management	16.5%
Oracle API Management	0.5%
Other	83.0%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Praveen_Srivastava

Solution Architect at Cognizant

Streamlined operations with gateway and authentication features

Azure API Management has helped streamline our operations by acting as a gateway for upstream and downstream applications. It provides authentication and authorization, ensuring that both verified and suspicious users are managed efficiently. The use of analytics within API Management is also valuable for tracking user behavior and ensuring security.

Read full review

Sagar SampadMall

IT-Operation Head at Granules India Ltd

Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure

My main feedback is about the account management. I feel they should connect with clients more frequently, beyond just selling the product. They should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products. My main suggestion is focused solely on the account management approach, specifically fostering closer and more proactive client relationships. So, the pricing could also be bit improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a valuable tool for API lifecycle management"

"The solution is reliable and very stable."

"Without a doubt, it has a very robust, strong marketplace where we can directly integrate with existing APIs and begin working on those."

"Initial setup was quite easy."

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure API Management are the easy configuration and deployment with automation."

"I like the support they provide for the APIs more than the solution itself. First of all, documentation-wise, both Microsoft Azure and even Google Cloud are up there. But in comparison, the real-time consulting and support for APIs make Microsoft stand out a little. I also like the performance. Standard public cloud provider-built APIs are more resilient and flexible in terms of what feature you want to use and what feature you don't want to use, and they're more customizable. They are more resilient in terms of performance in that particular environment because that is the design aspect of the offering. When public clouds build APIs and deploy them after testing them on their framework for a certain amount of time, I feel there is a massive difference in the product's performance. On the interface, everything is strong."

"Azure APIM's best features are its straightforward access management (it's a single point of access for all monitoring and logging and for policy implementation) and its integration with the Azure Cloud infrastructure."

"The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pros

"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."

"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."

"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."

"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."

Cons

"It should be easier to integrate."

"Security could be improved."

"Microsoft Azure API Management's most valuable features are the microservices we used to use. They were API callers to receive communication with the network and building system, to complete the request. The response would be through the processing system."

"The external policies are impossible to look at and configure."

"The developer console for external users could be improved, especially in the testing site."

"The implementation has room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."

"If I compare this solution to others I have used in other phases of my life, having APIM being an Azure resource, it is easy to configure and deploy. However, this conversely reduced the flexibility. The difficulty is how do we configure it in a manner that a larger enterprise would probably want it to be. This creates a bit more complexity, working around the constraints of the resource itself. If comparing it to other solutions, it is more of a legacy design with an older approach. The various level components are still around resembling an on-premise type of design similar to other solutions, such as Apigee or Mulesoft. They are still predominantly carrying some legacy design. Which might be suited for organizations where they have a more complex network layout. APIM is easy to deploy, but on the other side of that, it is constrained to how Azure has designed it to be."

"The user interface needs improvement."

More Microsoft Azure API Management cons

"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."

"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."

"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."

"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure is a pay-as-you-go model. You build out your virtual environment and pay a monthly price depending on CPU cores, storage, etc."

"The price is comparable."

"Compared to other solutions the cost is a seven out of ten."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources."

"The developer and standard pricing tiers of Azure API Management are very competitive compared to other products."

"It costs around 30,000 Kronas a month, which translates to about $3,000 dollars monthly."

"Azure's pricing is very competitive compared to platforms like Apigee and MuleSoft."

More Microsoft Azure API Management pricing and cost advice

"Oracle is not a cheap solution and it is not affordable for all of our clients in Portugal."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Apigee differ from Azure API Management?

Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the ability...

See all answers

Which is better - Azure API Management or Amazon API Gateway?

If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure API Management?

Microsoft Azure API Management is a good, comprehensive solution for enterprise implementation.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle API Management?

It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle API Management?

We opted for a five-year license. It's mid-range, not too high. More affordable than many other options. It's already more affordable than others, especially for small companies it is accommodating...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle API Management?

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 50% of the time

Apigee vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 15% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 5% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Microsoft Azure API Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure API Management Competitors

Apigee vs Oracle API Management

Compared 35% of the time

IBM API Connect vs Oracle API Management

Compared 17% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Oracle API Management

Compared 17% of the time

DigitMarket API Manager vs Oracle API Management

Compared 13% of the time

More Oracle API Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management

August 2025

Download Microsoft Azure API Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle API Management

August 2025

Download Oracle API Management product report

Also Known As

Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure API Management is essential for managing APIs, facilitating integration, and ensuring secure internal and external communication.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Azure API Management for seamless integration and effective API management. It supports microservices, legacy modernization, and platform orchestration in sectors like healthcare, telecom, and finance. Features such as developer portals and centralized libraries simplify usage. While it showcases strengths in hybrid cloud support and scalability, improvements are suggested in versioning and multi-tenancy.

What key features does it offer?

Integration with Microsoft services ensures robust access control and user-friendly deployment.
Developer portal and documentation improve usability and learning.
Hybrid cloud support offers seamless on-premise connectivity.
Scalability and security features are well-regarded.
Centralized API library simplifies management.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Facilitates API lifecycle management enhancing user experience.
Simplifies authentication and subscription models.
Enhances data exchange and real-time monitoring.
Streamlines API mapping and orchestration across platforms.
Promotes flexibility and transparency in system integration.

Microsoft Azure API Management aids modernization across healthcare, telecom, and financial services by enabling legacy system updates and facilitating smooth platform orchestration.

Microsoft

Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

Oracle

Sample Customers

adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management

September 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.