Microsoft Azure API Management vs Oracle API Management comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure API Management and Oracle API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management Report (Updated: November 2022).
653,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is reliable and very stable.""Easy to integrate API management platform. It is a stable and scalable solution.""The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges.""We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS.""I like API Management's sandbox feature. It's an environment where you can test out the API before putting it into production and connecting it to a live environment.""I like the stability and the ease of use.""Microsoft Azure API Management is better because it has a DevOps integration by default.""Azure API is scalable."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Pros →

"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great.""The initial setup isn't overly difficult."

More Oracle API Management Pros →

"The external policies are impossible to look at and configure.""One of the most important improvements for us would be if it supported the HTTP/3 version and new protocol over a quick connection.""Microsoft Azure API Management could improve the documentation. The documentation feels like marketing information and not sufficient technical information. Your easiest option is to purchase services from a Microsoft partner and this is their marketing.""It can be quite complex, somewhat lacking in flexibility.""Specific to API development, I think Microsoft is still far behind AWS. AWS has grown by leaps and bounds, and Microsoft is a close second. But in terms of features and other stuff they provide, Microsoft's compatibility with publicly available APIs is a little limited. So, that is a little bit of a constraint. But what they provide is good, it's just that they need to build more on their API suite. I think Google is doing a really good job at that.""It should be easier to integrate.""The hybrid part could be improved because API Management is entirely cloud-based, but some of our resources are on-prem, so formatting is an issue. Our goal is dual implementation.""I could that the UI could be improved."

More Microsoft Azure API Management Cons →

"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features.""From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."

More Oracle API Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Based on the resources that we are leveraging, the price we are paying to use this solution is slightly higher than other competitors. In a few cases, it has its own advantage in some resources."
  • "Since this is a cloud-based solution you have to abide by those financial limits, this creates some different challenges compared to other solutions."
  • "The licensing fees are expensive."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable compared to others."
  • "Since everyone is isocentric here, it is reasonable for me."
  • "We pay for a yearly license."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on an annual basis."
  • "Azure's pricing is very competitive compared to platforms like Apigee and MuleSoft."
  • More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    653,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: Apigee offers both cloud-based and on-prem options while Microsoft Azure API Management currently only offers a cloud-based solution. Both solutions are easy to use. Apigee allows for the… more »
    Top Answer:If you use Azure products, API Management is a great solution. It solves many of the problems of externalizing web services. For example, when you need versioning, establish a developer portal and… more »
    Top Answer:The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges.
    Top Answer:The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great.
    Top Answer:Although it is working great for us at the moment, we don't enjoy its user-interface. The UI is based on old approach and needs an overhaul to modernize the UI and user interaction. Developer… more »
    Top Answer:We are using this solution in the enterprise for publishing APIs to external client systems and internal systems to receive and process requests. We are using this solution for monitoring and securing… more »
    out of 42 in API Management
    Average Words per Review
    out of 42 in API Management
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Azure API Management, MS Azure API Management
    Learn More
    Microsoft Azure API Management ensures an organization's API program reaches its fullest potential. With API management, organizations can publish web services as APIs reliably, securely and at scale. Use API Management to drive API consumption among internal teams, partners, and developers while benefiting from business and operational insights available in the admin portal.

    Oracle API Management enable you to streamline business and IT objectives by managing the lifecycle of your APIs, outsource application enhancement by empowering developers through API adoption, and add a mobile front to your applications and capture new revenue opportunities with seamless API enablement.

    Learn more about Microsoft Azure API Management
    Learn more about Oracle API Management
    Sample Customers
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH, Opensistemas
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Insurance Company7%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
    653,522 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 2nd in API Management with 31 reviews while Oracle API Management is ranked 23rd in API Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8, while Oracle API Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Easy to set up with good access control but support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle API Management writes "Easy to use with good scalability and performance". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Apigee, Amazon API Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas Oracle API Management is most compared with Apigee, IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager, Kong Enterprise and 3scale API Management. See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. Oracle API Management report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.