We performed a comparison between IBM API Connect and Oracle API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon and others in API Management."The solution is very scalable because it's on the cloud."
"This solution is ready to scale and already supports our agile CICD."
"The solution offers a pretty good SLA."
"It gives a holistic environment for us to set up the APIs and that's the main value that it adds. It gives end to end for us."
"I have found IBM API Connect to be highly secure, efficient, easy to deploy, and has a great GUI. It can operate and integrate well with other vendors, such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft."
"API Connect's most valuable feature is its ability to act as a gateway. It's very easy to configure security and everything else in it. You don't have to kill yourself implementing custom configurations."
"This is a very easy to use solution."
"The most valuable features are stability and security."
"The initial setup isn't overly difficult."
"The most valuable features for us are security and centralization."
"It is very secure, easy to manage, and easy to configure. It is a web-based API. Moreover, we get direct support from Oracle guys."
"The security, the authentication, and the publishing qualities are great."
"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."
"Our main pain points are in these two areas: creating a better developer portal and improving stability in terms of synchronization and monetization."
"Debugging could be improved."
"IBM API Connect could improve the security of the application and the integration."
"The installation process could use improvement. I hope that in the next release, the installation process is easier."
"The solution would be better if it had cloud functionalities."
"It should be cheaper."
"Possible improvement is mainly around having more of the cloud oriented architecture bringing stability in adding new capabilities around security."
"Before gaining experience with the product, I found that it was not simple to use and things took longer to do than I had anticipated."
"From an administration and developer point of view, the user interface and user experience are not great."
"We'd like it if they could reduce the cost without sacrificing on features."
"Oracle should actively seek feedback and tailor the approach to client needs. It shouldn't always be about pushing additional products."
IBM API Connect is ranked 5th in API Management with 73 reviews while Oracle API Management is ranked 19th in API Management with 5 reviews. IBM API Connect is rated 7.8, while Oracle API Management is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM API Connect writes "Good speed and performance, but it's based on a bit dated architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle API Management writes "Provides robust security for financial transactions and protects the ERP database from direct exposure". IBM API Connect is most compared with IBM DataPower Gateway, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas Oracle API Management is most compared with Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and WSO2 API Manager.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.