We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Automate and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The templates on offer are very good."
"The most advantageous aspect of the solution is its cloud capabilities."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Power Automate are user-friendliness and low coding functionality."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Power Automate are the ease of use and the templates that are provided. I no longer need to make the document from scratch. I can search for what template I want and then it only requires me to modify it a bit for my needs. Additionally, it's helped improve my productivity and efficiency, and at the same time, it's quicker."
"The most valuable feature is that it is pretty low-code, so you don't need much coding expertise to use it."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"I believe document reading has been beneficial when dealing with Microsoft."
"WinAutomation is very handy to use, and it has the power to interact with multiple systems, such as SAP, Oracle, or .NET systems."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"The licensing model is difficult to understand and is something that should be improved."
"We need a more powerful desktop option."
"It would be great if you could integrate outside of Microsoft environments."
"They can provide a deeper level of feedback about running processes. When I compare it to Blue Prism, the control room has slightly less information about the running processes and possible errors. I'm not a pro, so I am not entirely sure if this is a core feature of the product or if it is because of the way our partners have developed it or set it up."
"Microsoft Power Automate could improve by adding more features to the free version it would be good because there are many features that you have to pay for. There are some functions that IT personnel, like myself, have a difficult time using and could be made more user-friendly."
"I was working on it for around three days and then took a break of about two days. When I went back to it, all of the Excel, and all the Excel functions, just disappeared. Completely vanished. When I looked up the help, it said that sometimes that happens when you're not connected to the internet."
"When compared to other workflow automation tools out there, it's just not as mature."
"Compared to other RPA solutions, there is a little bit of a feature gap."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
Microsoft Power Automate is ranked 2nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 123 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Microsoft Power Automate is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Automate writes "Provides valuable integration with other Microsoft tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Microsoft Power Automate is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Fortra's Automate, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), SAS Data Management and ABBYY Vantage. See our Microsoft Power Automate vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
